2023 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters, Part B — Palau
2023 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters, Part B — Palau
PDF2023 SPP/APR Submission, Part B — Palau
MS WORD (.docx)View PDF
2023 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters, Part B — Palau
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600
www.ed.gov
The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by
fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION
O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES
J une 23 , 20 2 3
Honorable Dale Jenkins
Secretary of Education
Republic of Palau
P.O. Box 189
Koror , PW 96940
Dear Secretary Jenkins :
I am writing to advise you of the U. S. Department of Education ’ s (Department) 202 3
determination under Section 616 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The
Department has determined that Palau needs assistance in implementing the requirements of Part
B of the IDEA. This determination is based on the totality of Palau ’s data and information,
including th e Federal fiscal year (FFY) 20 2 1 State Performance Plan/Annual Performance
Report (SPP/APR), other Entity - reported data, and other publicly available information.
The Office of Special Educat ion Programs (OSEP) is continuing to use both results and
compliance data in making determinations for outlying areas, freely associated States , and the
Bureau of Indian Education (the Entities) in 202 3 , as it did for determinations in 20 2 2 . 1
Palau ’s
202 3 determination is based on the dat a reflected in the Entity’s “ 202 3 Part B Results - Driven
Accountability Matrix” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for each Entity and
consists of:
(1) a Compliance Matrix that in cludes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other
comp liance factors;
(2) a Results Matrix that includes scoring on Results Elements ;
(3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score ;
(4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Compliance Score and the Results Score ; and
(5) the E ntity’s Determination.
The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “ How the Department Made
Determinations under Section 616(d) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 2023:
Freely Associated States, Outlying Areas, and the Bureau of Indian Education - Part B ”
(HTDMD).
1
For the 2023 determinations, OSEP is using results data on the participation and performance of children with
disabilities on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) for the 50 States, the District of Columbia,
and Puerto Rico. Starting in 2 023, OSEP is using the NAEP data in making Puerto Rico’s determination (as indicated
in the 2022 determination letters to States and Entities). OSEP did not use NAEP data in making the BIE’s 2023
determination because the NAEP data available for the BIE were not comparable to the NAEP data available for the 50
States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico; specifically, the most recently administered NAEP for the BIE is
2019, whereas the most recently administered NAEP for the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico is
2022.
Page 2— Chief State School Officer
The specifics of the determination procedures and criteria are set forth in the HTDMD document
and reflected in the RDA Matrix for Palau . In making Part B determinations in 202 3, OSEP used
results data related to:
(1) the participation o f children with disabilities (CWD) on Regular statewide assessments;
(2) the percentage of CWD who graduated with a regular high school diploma; and
(3) the percentage of CWD who drop ped out.
Prior to issuing the 2023 determinations, the Department asked stakeh olders for input regarding
how the Department might prioritize equity and improve results for infants, toddlers , children
and youth with disabilities . OSEP received input through a variety of sources. For its 2023
determinations, OSEP has factored only programmatic (not Department -wide) s pecific
conditions when scoring the Longstanding Noncompliance element of the Compliance Matrix.
Also, while Indicator 4B (significant discrepancy, by race or ethnicity , in rates of suspension and
expulsion for children with disabilities ) continued to be a factor in each Entity’s 2023
Compliance Matrix, no Entity’s 2023 determination was negatively impacted due solely to its
Indicator 4B data .
For 2024 and beyond, the D epartment is considering the weight of existing as well as potential
additional factors in making its determinations as part of its continuing effort to prioritize equity
and improve results for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities . Pot ential
additional factors include how the Department considers assessment data, such as whether to
continue including data on the participation and proficiency of CWD on the NAEP and/or
whether to include data on the proficiency of CWD on Statewide assessm ents. Other potential
factors include whether and how to consider child find under Indicators C -5 and C -6 and/or other
longstanding noncompliance (such as unresolved findings issued by OSEP during and prior to
FFY 2020) .
Starting with the 2022 -23 data sub mitted to EDFacts, States or Entities will submit the majority
of the IDEA Section 618 data collections (i.e., Part B Child Count and Educational
Environments, Part B Personnel, Part B Exiting, Part B Discipline, and Part B Assessment) via
the new EDPass s ystem. The Part B Dispute Resolution and the Part B Maintenance of Effort
Reduction and Coordinated Early intervening Services data will continue to be submitted via
EMAPS.
The 2022 -23 IDEA Section 618 Part B data will continue to prepopulate the Part B SP P/APR
Indicators 3, 5, and 6 as they have in the past. However, p lease note that there will be changes to
the data submission and data quality processes associated with the 2022 -23 IDEA Section 618
Part B data under EDFacts Modernization. Under EDFacts Mod ernization, States or Entities are
expected to submit high -quality IDEA Section 618 Part B data that can be published and used by
the Department as of the due date for the applicable IDEA Section 618 data submission . Starting
with the 2022 -23 IDEA Section 618 Part B data, States or Entities will be expected to conduct
data quality reviews prior to the applicable due date. OSEP will expect States or Entities to take
one of the following two actions for all business rules that are triggered in the EDPass or
EMAPS system prior to the applicable due date: 1) revise the uploaded data to address the edit;
or 2) provide a data note addressing why the data submission triggered the business rule. Please
note that States or Entities will be unable to submit the IDEA S ection 618 Part B data to the
Department without taking one of these two actions. There will not be a resubmission period for
Page 3— Chief State School Officer
the IDEA Section 618 Part B data. The 2022 -23 IDEA Section 618 Part B data submitted as of
the applicable due date will be used fo r the FFY 2022 SPP/APR and the 2024 IDEA Part B
Results Matrix.
You may access the results of OSEP’s re view of Palau ’s SPP/APR and other relevant data by
accessing the EMAPS SPP/APR reporting t ool using your Entity -specific log -on information at
https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access Palau ’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find , in
applicable Indicators 1 through 1 7, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the
Entity is required to take. The actions that the Entity is required to take are in the “Required
Actions” section of the indicator.
It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include
language in the “OSEP Response ” and/or “Required Actions ” sections .
You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments:
(1) Palau ’s RDA Matrix;
(2) the HTDMD document;
(3) a spreadsheet entitled “ 202 3 Data Rubric Part B,” which shows how OSEP calculated
Palau ’s “Timely and Accurate State -Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and
(4) a document e ntitled “Dispute Resolution 20 21-20 22,” which includes the IDEA Section
618 data that OSEP used to calculate Palau ’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and
“Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix .
As noted above, Palau ’s 202 3 determination is Needs Assistance . A State’s or Entity’s 202 3 RDA
Det ermination is Needs Assistance if the RDA Percentage is at least 6 0% but less than 80%. A
State ’s or Entity ’s determination would also be Needs Assistance if its RDA Determination
percentage is 80% or above but the Department has imposed Specific Conditions on the State’s
or Entity’s last three IDEA Pa rt B grant awards (for FFYs 20 20 , 20 21, and 20 22), and those
Speci fic Conditions are i n effect at the time of the 202 2 determination.
Palau ’s determination for 20 22 was also N ee ds A ssistance. In accordance with Section 616(e)(1)
of the IDEA and 34 C.F.R. § 300.604(a), if a State or Entity is determined to need assistance for
two consecutive years, the Secretary must take one or more of the following actions:
(1) advise the State or Entity of available sources of technical assistance that may help the
State or E ntity address the areas in which it needs assistance and require the State or
Entity to work with appropriate entities;
(2) direct the use of State or Entity -level funds on the area or areas in which the State or
Entity needs assistance; or
(3) identify the Stat e or Entity as a high -risk grantee and impose Spec ific Conditions on the
State’s or Entity’s IDEA Part B grant award.
Pursuant to these requirements, the Secretary is advising Palau of available sources of technical
assistance, including OSEP -funded technical assistance centers and resources at the following
web site s: Monitorin g and State Improvement Planning (MSIP) | OSEP Ideas That Work ,
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Topic Areas , and requiring Palau to work
with appropriate entit ies. In addition, Palau should consider accessing technical assistance from
other Department -funded centers such as the Comprehensive Centers with resources at the
Page 4— Chief State School Officer
following link: https://compcenternetwork.org/states . The Secretary directs Palau to determine
the results elements and/or compliance indicators, and improvement strategies, on which it will
focus its use of available technical assistance, in order to improve its performance. We strongly
encourage Palau to access technical assistance related to those results elements and compliance
indicators for which Palau received a score of zero. Palau must report with its FFY 20 22
SPP/APR submission, due February 1, 20 24, on:
(1) the technical assistance sources from which Palau received assistance; and
(2) the actions Palau took as a result of that technical assistance.
As required by IDEA Section 616(e)(7) and 34 C .F.R. § 300.606, Palau must notify the public
that the Secretary of Education has taken the above enforcement actions, including, at a
minimum, by posting a pu blic notice on its website and distributing the notice to the media and
through public agencies.
As a reminder, Palau must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on its agency’s
web site. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing an Entity Profile that:
(1) includes the En tity ’s determination letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments, and all Entity
attachments that are accessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973; and
(2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website.
OSEP appreciates Palau ’s efforts to improve results for children and youth with disabilities and
looks forward to working with Palau over the next year as we con tinue our important work of
improving the lives of children with disabilities and their families. Please contact your OSEP
State Lead i f you have any questions, would like to discuss this further, or want to request
technical assistance.
Sincerely,
/s/
Val erie Williams
Director
Office of Special Education Programs
cc: Palau Director of Special Education
(Grant Year 2021–2022 — Issued June 23, 2023)
How the department made determinations (Entities)
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-88948 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on August 17, 2023