2013 Annual Reports to Congress on the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

Home » 2013 Annual Reports to Congress on the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

IDEA Parts B and C

This is the 35th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2013. Section 664(d) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), as reauthorized in 2004, requires that the Department of Education report annually on the progress made toward the provision of a free appropriate public education to all children with disabilities and the provision of early intervention services to infants and toddlers with disabilities.

The 35th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2013 describes our nation’s progress in:

  1. providing a free appropriate public education (FAPE) for all children with disabilities,
  2. ensuring that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected,
  3. assisting states and localities in providing for the education of all children with disabilities, and
  4. assessing the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities.

The report focuses on the children and students with disabilities being served under IDEA, Part C or B, nationally and at the state level.

Download 2013 Annual Report

35th Annual Report to Congress

Since enactment of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Public Law (P.L.) 94-142, the secretary of the U.S. Department of Education (secretary) [and predecessor, the commissioner of education at the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare] has been required to transmit to Congress an annual report to inform Congress and the public of the progress being made in implementing the act. The annual reports to Congress reflect a history of persistent commitment and effort to expand educational opportunities for children with disabilities.

In December 2004, Congress reauthorized the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (P.L. 108-446), which was signed into law the same month. The provisions of IDEA became effective on July 1, 2005, with the exception of some of the elements pertaining to the definition of a “highly qualified teacher”[1] that took effect upon the signing of the act. With reauthorization of IDEA, the nation reaffirmed its commitment to improving educational results for children and youths with disabilities.

The 35th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2013[2] describes our nation’s progress in:

  1. providing a free appropriate public education (FAPE) for all children with disabilities,
  2. ensuring that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected,
  3. assisting states and localities in providing for the education of all children with disabilities, and
  4. assessing the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities.

The report focuses on the children and students with disabilities being served under IDEA, Part C or B, nationally and at the state level. In particular, Part C of IDEA provides funds to states to assist them in developing and implementing statewide, comprehensive, coordinated, multidisciplinary interagency systems to make early intervention services available to all children from birth through age 2 with disabilities and their families, whereas Part B of IDEA provides funds to states to assist them in providing FAPE to children ages 3 through 21 with disabilities who are in need of special education and related services. Throughout this report, infants and toddlers served under IDEA, Part C, children served under IDEA, Part B, and students served under IDEA, Part B, refer to individuals with disabilities who receive services under IDEA, Part C or Part B. “Special education services,” which is referenced throughout this report, is a term that is synonymous with services provided under IDEA, Part B. Similarly, “early intervention services” is a term used synonymously with services provided under IDEA, Part C.

This 35th Annual Report to Congress, 2013 follows the 34th Annual Report to Congress, 2012 in sequence and format, and it continues to focus on IDEA results and accountability. Similar to the 34th Annual Report, 2012, the 35th Annual Report, 2013 contains six major sections that address the five annual report requirements contained in section 664(d) of IDEA. The sections are:

  1. a summary and analysis of IDEA section 618 data at the national level;
  2. a summary and analysis of IDEA section 618 data at the state level;[3]
  3. a summary and analysis of the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department’s) findings and determinations regarding the extent to which states are meeting the requirements of IDEA, Parts B and C;
  4. a summary of special education research conducted under Part E of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002;
  5. a summary of national special education studies and evaluations conducted under sections 664(a) and (c) of IDEA; and
  6. a summary of the extent and progress of the assessment of national activities, which focus on determining the effectiveness of IDEA and improving its implementation.

The content of this report differs from that of the 34th Annual Report, 2012 in that it does not include an exhibit in Section II that presents data about exits from Part B for states that used and states that did not use exit exams for students served under IDEA, Part B. The source of information that had been used to classify the states regarding the use of exit exams did not include information about the time period addressed in this report, and no alternative source was identified.

A summary of the six sections and three appendices that make up the 35th Annual Report, 2013 follows.

Preface Footnotes

[1] When referring to a “highly qualified teacher,” the term “highly qualified” has the meaning given the term in section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). For a highly qualified special education teacher, the term “highly qualified” has the same meaning given the term in ESEA, except that such term also includes the requirements described in section 602(10)(B) of IDEA, and the option for teachers to meet the requirements of section 9101 of ESEA, as amended, by meeting the requirements of section 602(10)(C) or (D) of IDEA [see 20 U.S.C. section 1401(10)].

[2] The year in the title reflects the U.S. Department of Education’s target year for submitting the report to Congress. The most current findings are based on data collected from July 2010 through December 2011. These data have been available to the public prior to their presentation in this report.

[3] 618 data consist of (1) the number of infants and toddlers served under IDEA, Part C; the settings in which they receive program services; information on the transition at age 3 out of Part C; and dispute resolutions and (2) the number of children and students served under IDEA, Part B; the environments in which they receive education; their participation in and performance on state assessments; information on their exiting special education services; the personnel employed to provide educational services to them; disciplinary actions that affect them; and dispute resolution information.

Section I contains national data pertinent to Parts C and B of IDEA. It contains four subsections. The four subsections focus on infants and toddlers served under IDEA, Part C; children ages 3 through 5 served under IDEA, Part B; students ages 6 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B; and children and students ages 3 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B. The exhibits provide information about the characteristics of children and students receiving services under Parts C and B, their disabilities, the settings in which they receive services, their participation in and performance on state assessments, their exits from Part C and Part B programs, their disciplinary removals, and their legal disputes. Also addressed are the characteristics of the personnel employed to provide special education and related services for the children and students. The data presented in the exhibits and discussed in the bulleted text represent the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the outlying areas (i.e., American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands). In addition, the report presents data for special education and related services provided under IDEA, Part B, for Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) schools operated or funded by the U.S. Department of the Interior.

Section II contains state-level data regarding Part C and Part B of IDEA. Similar to Section I, this section is organized into four subsections. The first subsection presents information about infants and toddlers served under IDEA, Part C, while the second and third subsections present information about children ages 3 through 5 and students ages 6 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B, respectively. The fourth subsection provides information about children and students ages 3 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B. The four subsections address questions about the characteristics of children and students receiving services under Parts C and B, their disabilities, the settings in which they receive services, their participation in state assessments, their exits from Part C and Part B programs, their disciplinary removals, and their legal disputes. Also addressed are the characteristics of the personnel employed to provide special education and related services for the children and students. The data presented in exhibits and discussed in the bulleted text represent the 50 states, the District of Columbia, BIE schools, and Puerto Rico.

Sections 616(d) and 642 of IDEA require the secretary to make an annual determination as to the extent to which each state’s Part B and Part C programs are meeting the requirements of the statute. To fulfill this requirement, the secretary considers each state’s State Performance Plan (SPP) and Annual Performance Report (APR). Based on the information provided by the state in the SPP and APR, information obtained through monitoring reviews, and any other public information made available, the secretary determines if the state meets the requirements and purposes of IDEA, needs assistance in implementing the requirements, needs intervention in implementing the requirements, or needs substantial intervention in implementing the requirements. In June 2012, the Department issued the determination letters on implementation of IDEA for federal fiscal year (FFY) 2010 to 60 state education agencies for Part B and to 56 state lead agencies for Part C. Section III presents the results of the determinations.

When Congress reauthorized IDEA in December 2004, it amended the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-279) by adding a new Part E to that act. The new Part E established the National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) as part of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). NCSER began operation on July 1, 2005. As specified in section 175(b) of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, NCSER’s mission is to

  • Sponsor research to expand knowledge and understanding of the needs of infants, toddlers, and children with disabilities in order to improve the developmental, educational, and transitional results of such individuals;
  • Sponsor research to improve services provided under, and support the implementation of, IDEA (20 U.S.C. section 1400 et seq.); and
  • Evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of IDEA in coordination with the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Section IV of this report describes the research projects funded by grants made during FFY 2012 (October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2012) by NCSER under Part E of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002.

In the December 2004 reauthorization of IDEA, Congress required the secretary to delegate to the director of IES responsibility to carry out studies and evaluations under sections 664(a), (b), and (c) of IDEA. As specified in section 664(a) of IDEA, IES, either directly or through grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements awarded to eligible entities on a competitive basis, assesses the progress in the implementation of IDEA, including the effectiveness of state and local efforts to provide:

  1. FAPE to children with disabilities and
  2. early intervention services to infants and toddlers with disabilities and infants and toddlers who would be at risk of having substantial developmental delays if early intervention services were not provided to them.

As specified in section 664(c) of IDEA, IES is required to carry out a national study or studies that will inform efforts to ensure accountability for students who are held to alternate achievement standards. This section describes the studies and evaluations authorized by sections 664(a) and (c) of IDEA and supported by IES during FFY 2012 (October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2012).

Under section 664(b) of IDEA (as amended in 2004), the secretary is responsible for carrying out a “national assessment” of activities carried out with federal funds under IDEA. As delegated by the secretary, IES is carrying out this national assessment to:

  1. determine the effectiveness of IDEA in achieving the law’s purpose;
  2. provide timely information to the president, Congress, the states, local education agencies, and the public on how to implement IDEA more effectively; and
  3. to provide the president and Congress with information that will be useful in developing legislation to achieve the purposes of IDEA more effectively.

The national assessment is designed to address specific research questions that focus on:

  1. the implementation and impact of programs assisted under IDEA in addressing developmental and academic outcomes for children with disabilities,
  2. identification for early intervention and special education,
  3. early intervention and special education services, and
  4. early intervention and special education personnel.

Studies funded in FFY 2012 that contribute to the national assessment are described in Section VI.

Appendix A presents the numbers and percentages of the resident population represented by the infants and toddlers birth through age 2 served under IDEA, Part C; children ages 3 through 5 served under IDEA, Part B; students ages 6 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B; and students ages 14 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B, in 2011 in each state, the District of Columbia, BIE schools, Puerto Rico, and the four outlying areas. It also presents the number of children served in each state by race/ethnicity.

Appendix B presents information on states that reported children ages 3 through 5 and students ages 6 through 9 served under IDEA, Part B, under the category of developmental delay.[4] It also provides data on the percentages of resident populations represented by the children ages 3 through 5 and students ages 6 through 9 served under IDEA, Part B, who were reported under the category of developmental delay and information on states with different practices in reporting children and students with developmental delay.

Appendix B Footnote

[4] This descriptor and other section 618 data descriptors in this report are italicized within exhibits, text, and notes to clarify that the reference is to a grouping of data.

Appendix C presents information on the states that reported children and students ages 3 through 21 with other health impairments and multiple disabilities in different disability categories for IDEA, Part B, child count and educational environments data collections in 2011, and for the exiting and discipline data collections in 2010–11.

[1] (Found in Preface) When referring to a “highly qualified teacher,” the term “highly qualified” has the meaning given the term in section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). For a highly qualified special education teacher, the term “highly qualified” has the same meaning given the term in ESEA, except that such term also includes the requirements described in section 602(10)(B) of IDEA, and the option for teachers to meet the requirements of section 9101 of ESEA, as amended, by meeting the requirements of section 602(10)(C) or (D) of IDEA [see 20 U.S.C. section 1401(10)].

[2] (Found in Preface) The year in the title reflects the U.S. Department of Education’s target year for submitting the report to Congress. The most current findings are based on data collected from July 2010 through December 2011. These data have been available to the public prior to their presentation in this report.

[3] (Found in Preface) 618 data consist of (1) the number of infants and toddlers served under IDEA, Part C; the settings in which they receive program services; information on the transition at age 3 out of Part C; and dispute resolutions and (2) the number of children and students served under IDEA, Part B; the environments in which they receive education; their participation in and performance on state assessments; information on their exiting special education services; the personnel employed to provide educational services to them; disciplinary actions that affect them; and dispute resolution information.

[4] (Found in Appendix B) This descriptor and other section 618 data descriptors in this report are italicized within exhibits, text, and notes to clarify that the reference is to a grouping of data.

Data Descriptions and Data Files

Links to the descriptions of the categories and subcategories of IDEA, Part B and Part C data used in the 35th Annual Report and the actual data used to populate the tables and figures in Sections I and II and the appendixes of the report are provided below.

Part B of IDEA provides funds to states to assist them in providing FAPE to children ages three through 21 with disabilities who are in need of special education and related services.

Go to the Part B Data Descriptions and Data Files.

Part C of IDEA provides funds to states to assist them in developing and implementing statewide, comprehensive, coordinated, multidisciplinary interagency systems to make early intervention services available to all children from birth through age two with disabilities and their families.

Go to the Part C Data Descriptions and Data Files.

Census annual population estimates were used to determine percentages of the general population served by IDEA, Parts B and C, and to develop comparisons and conduct data analyses.

Go to the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Data Files.

Suspension, Severe Discrepancy, Screening
post-template-default single single-post postid-63989 single-format-standard wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Share:
LinkedIn

Last modified on February 5, 2024