POLICY LETTER: October 23, 2013 to Luke E. Kelly
Home » Policy Documents » POLICY LETTER: October 23, 2013 to Luke E. Kelly
MS Word
MS WORDPDF
PDFView File
MS Word
Desktop\DOE_Logo_small.gif" * MERGEFORMAT States Department of EducationOffice of Special Education And Rehabilitative ServicesOctober 23, 2013Luke E. Kelly, Ph.D., CAPEDirector of Adapted Physical EducationCurry School of Education, University of Virginia202 Emmet Street SouthP.O. Box 400407Charlottesville, VA 22904-4407Dear Dr. Kelly:This is in response to your May 5, 2013 letter to Michael K. Yudin, Acting Assistant Secretary, Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, United States Department of Education, requesting clarification of provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and its implementing regulations at 34 CFR Part 300. We understand your letter to be asking whether physical education is required for high school students with disabilities ages 16-21, if it is in their individualized education programs (IEPs), even though physical education is not provided to their non-disabled peers in those grades. Your letter also notes that the IEPs for some of these students with disabilities, particularly those ages 18-21, are implemented in community-based transition programs.Your fundamental question (i.e., whether a student with disability, for whom physical education is included on his or her IEP, is entitled to physical education even if physical education is not available to his or her same-age typically developing peers) was recently addressed in the Office of Special Education Programs' (OSEP) response to Garth Tymeson dated July 31, 2013 (Letter to Tymeson) located at HYPERLINK "http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/index.html" http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdUnder 34 CFR 300.108 HYPERLINK "http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cregs%2C300%2CB%2C300%252E107%2Ca%2C" (c), [i]f specially designed physical education is prescribed in a child's IEP, the public agency responsible for the education of that child must provide the services directly or make arrangements for those services to be provided through other public or private programs. Thus, under Part B, if physical education is specially designed to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability and is set out in that child's IEP, those services must be provided whether or not they are provided to other children in the agency. Analysis of Comments and Changes of the final Part B regulations, 71 Fed. Reg. 46540, 46583 (August 14, 2006). Letter to Tymeson specifically addresses pre-school aged children with disabilities. However, we believe that the same analysis applies to students with disabilities ages 16-21.Your letter states that the placement for some students with IEPs ages 18-21 is a community-based transition program. The Department's longstanding position is that placement refers to the provision of special education and related services rather than a specific place, such as a specific classroom or specific school. 71 Fed. Reg. 46540, 46687 (August 14, 2006). Neither the statute nor 34 CFR 300.108 distinguish between the potential locations, i.e., a high school setting or a community-based transition program, where a student with physical education on his or her IEP should receive it. We believe that the placement decision is best left to the team that determines the educational placement, under 34 CFR 300.327, of the student with a disability. Based on sectioDesktop\DOE_Logo_small.gif" * MERGEFORMAT States Department of EducationOffice of Special Education And Rehabilitative ServicesOctober 23, 2013Luke E. Kelly, Ph.D., CAPEDirector of Adapted Physical EducationCurry School of Education, University of Virginia202 Emmet Street SouthP.O. Box 400407Charlottesville, VA 22904-4407Dear Dr. Kelly:This is in response to your May 5, 2013 letter to Michael K. Yudin, Acting Assistant Secretary, Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, United States Department of Education, requesting clarification of provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and its implementing regulations at 34 CFR Part 300. We understand your letter to be asking whether physical education is required for high school students with disabilities ages 16-21, if it is in their individualized education programs (IEPs), even though physical education is not provided to their non-disabled peers in those grades. Your letter also notes that the IEPs for some of these students with disabilities, particularly those ages 18-21, are implemented in community-based transition programs.Your fundamental question (i.e., whether a student with disability, for whom physical education is included on his or her IEP, is entitled to physical education even if physical education is not available to his or her same-age typically developing peers) was recently addressed in the Office of Special Education Programs' (OSEP) response to Garth Tymeson dated July 31, 2013 (Letter to Tymeson) located at HYPERLINK "http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/index.html" http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdUnder 34 CFR 300.108 HYPERLINK "http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cregs%2C300%2CB%2C300%252E107%2Ca%2C" (c), [i]f specially designed physical education is prescribed in a child's IEP, the public agency responsible for the education of that child must provide the services directly or make arrangements for those services to be provided through other public or private programs. Thus, under Part B, if physical education is specially designed to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability and is set out in that child's IEP, those services must be provided whether or not they are provided to other children in the agency. Analysis of Comments and Changes of the final Part B regulations, 71 Fed. Reg. 46540, 46583 (August 14, 2006). Letter to Tymeson specifically addresses pre-school aged children with disabilities. However, we believe that the same analysis applies to students with disabilities ages 16-21.Your letter states that the placement for some students with IEPs ages 18-21 is a community-based transition program. The Department's longstanding position is that placement refers to the provision of special education and related services rather than a specific place, such as a specific classroom or specific school. 71 Fed. Reg. 46540, 46687 (August 14, 2006). Neither the statute nor 34 CFR 300.108 distinguish between the potential locations, i.e., a high school setting or a community-based transition program, where a student with physical education on his or her IEP should receive it. We believe that the placement decision is best left to the team that determines the educational placement, under 34 CFR 300.327, of the student with a disability. Based on sectio
View PDF
PDF
U
NITED STATES D EPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
October 23, 2013
Luke E. Kelly, Ph.D., CAPE
Director of Adapted Physical Education
Curry School of Education, University of Virginia
202 Emmet Street South
P.O. Box 400407
Charlottesville, VA 22904- 4407
Dear Dr. Kelly:
This is in response to your May 5, 2013 letter to Michael K. Yudin, Acting Assistant Secretary,
Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, United States Department of Education,
requesting clarification of provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Edu cation Act (IDEA)
and its implementing regulations at 34 CFR Part 300. We understand your letter to be asking
whether physical education is required for high school students with disabilities ages 16- 21, if it
is in their individualized education programs (IEPs), even though physical education is not
provided to their non- disabled peers in those grades. Your letter also notes that the IEPs for
some of these students with disabilities, particularly those ages 18- 21, are implemented in
community -based trans ition programs.
Your fundamental question ( i.e., whether a student with disability, for whom physical education
is included on his or her IEP, is entitled to physical education even if physical education is not
available to his or her same -age typically developing peers) was recently addressed in the Office
of Special Education Programs’ (OSEP) response to Garth Tymeson dated July 31, 2013 ( Letter
to Tymeson ) located at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/index.html
.
Letter to Tymeson states –
The Part B regulations, at 34 CFR §300.108, address the requirements of school
districts to provide physical education s ervices to students with disabilities.
Section 300.108(a) requires schools to provide physical education to all children
receiving a free appropriate public education, unless the school does not provide
physical education to children without disabilities in the same grades. That
exception, however, only relieves schools of the 34 CFR §300.108(a) requirement
to provide general physical education to all students with disabilities regardless of
the unique needs of any given student and regardless of any student’s IEP.
Section 300.108(a) does not relieve schools of the duty to provide physical
education to those students who have unique needs requiring physical education
and have IEPs setting out physical education as part of that student’s special
education and related services.
Under 34 CFR §300.108(c), “ [i]f specially designed physical education is
prescribed in a child’s IEP, the public agency responsible for the education of that
child must provide the services directly or make arrangements for those services
Page 2 – Luke E. Kelly, Ph.D. CAPE
to be provided through other public or private programs.” Thus, under Part B, “if
physical education is specially designed to meet the unique needs of a child with a
disability and is set out in that child’s IEP, those services must be provided
whether or not they are provided to other children in the agency.” Analysis of
Comments and Changes of the final Part B regulations, 71 Fed. Reg. 46540,
46583 (Aug ust 14, 2006).
Letter to Tymeson specifically addresses pre -school aged children with disabilities. However, we
believe that the same analysis applies to students with disabilities ages 16 -21.
Your letter states that the placement for some students with IEPs ages 18- 21 is a community-
based transition program. The Department’s longstanding position is that placement refers to the
provision of special education and related services rather than a specific place, such as a specific
classroom or specific s chool. 71 Fed. Reg. 46540, 46687 (August 14, 2006). Neither the statute
nor 34 CFR §300.108 distinguish between the potential locations, i.e. , a high school setting or a
community -based transition program, where a student with physical education on his or her IEP
should receive it. We believe that the placement decision is best left to the team that determines
the educational placement, under 34 CFR §300.327, of the student with a disability.
Based on section 607(e) of the IDEA, we are informing you that our response is provided as
informal guidance and is not legally binding, but represents an interpretation by the U.S.
Department of Education of the IDEA in the context of the specific facts presented.
If you have questions, please do not hesitat e to contact Rebecca Walawender at 202-245- 7399 or
by email at Rebecca.Walawender@ed.gov
.
Sincerely,
Melody Musgrove, Ed.D
Director
Office of Special Education Programs
TOPIC: APE
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-43527 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on April 19, 2017