POLICY LETTER: July 31, 2009 to Chief State School Officers
Home » Policy Documents » POLICY LETTER: July 31, 2009 to Chief State School Officers
July 31, 2009 to Chief State School Officers (MS Word)
MS WORDJuly 31, 2009 to Chief State School Officers (PDF)
PDFView File
July 31, 2009 to Chief State School Officers (MS Word)
July 31, 2009Dear Chief State School Officers:On May 19, the Education and Labor Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives held a hearing to examine the abusive and potentially deadly misapplication of seclusion and restraint techniques in schools. Related to this hearing was the testimony issued on the same day by the Government Accountability Office on Seclusions and Restraints: Selected Cases of Death and Abuse at Public and Private Schools and Treatment Centers. The testimony is available on the Internet at the following Web address: HYPERLINK "http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09719t.pdf" http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09719t.pdf.I was deeply troubled by the testimony, as I am sure you would have been. As education leaders, our first responsibility should be to make sure that schools foster learning in a safe environment for all of our children and teachers. Therefore, I am encouraging each State to review its current policies and guidelines regarding the use of restraints and seclusion in schools to ensure every student is safe and protected, and if appropriate, develop or revise its policies and guidelines.My home State of Illinois has what I believe to be one good approach, including both a strong focus upon Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS) as well as State regulations that limit the use of seclusion and restraint under most circumstances (see HYPERLINK "http://www.isbe.state.il.us/rules/archive/pdfs/oneark.pdf" http://www.isbe.state.il.us/rules/archive/pdfs/oneark.pdf). The State's requirements, which I found to be extremely helpful as chief executive officer of the Chicago Public Schools, were described in testimony at the hearing. Illinois prohibits the use of seclusion or restraint for the purpose of punishment or exclusion, and allows trained staff to restrain students only in narrow circumstances. The State allows the use of isolated time out or physical restraint only in situations when it is absolutely necessary to preserve the safety of self or others; includes rules that must be followed when these techniques are used; and requires documentation of each incident to be provided to parents within 24 hours. Several other States have also adopted effective seclusion and/or restraint policies, but there are many jurisdictions that have not, leaving students and teachers vulnerable. Approximately 8,000 schools across the country are already implementing PBIS, a systems approach to establishing the social culture needed for schools to achieve social and academic gains while minimizing problem behavior for all children. PBIS provides a framework for decision making that guides the implementation of evidence-based academic and behavioral practices throughout the entire school, frequently resulting in significant reductions in office disciplinary referrals, suspensions, and expulsions. While the successful implementation of PBIS typically results in improved social and academic outcomes, it will noArne Duncan
TOPIC ADDRESSED: Seclusion and Restraints |
SECTION OF IDEA: This letter does not interpret IDEA but may be of interest to readers
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-50112 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on April 28, 2017