2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Hawaii
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
PDF2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Hawaii
MS WORDView PDF
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600
www.ed.gov
The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by
fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION
O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES
June 23, 20 20
Honorable Bruce Anderson PhD
Director of Health
Hawaii Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu , Hawaii 96813
Dear Director Anderson :
I am writing to advise you of the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) 2020
determination under sections 616 and 642 of the Individu als with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA). The Department has determined that Hawaii needs assistance in meeting the
requirements of Part C of the IDEA . This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data
and information, including the Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 State Performance Plan/Annual
Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State - reported data, and other publicly available
information.
Your State’s 2020 determination is based on the data reflected in the State’s “ 2020 Part C
Results - Driven Accountability Matrix” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for
each State and consists of:
(1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicato rs and other
compliance factors;
(2) Results Components and Appendices that include scoring on Results Elements;
(3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score;
(4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Compliance Score and the Results Score; and
(5) the State’s Determination .
The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made
Determinations under Sections 616(d) and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
in 2020 : Part C” (HTDMD).
The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP ) is continuing to use both results data and
compliance data in making the Department’s determinations in 2020 , as it did for the Part C
determinations in 2015, 201 6 , 201 7, 2018, and 2019 . (The specifics of the determination
procedures and criteria are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your
State.) For 2020 , the Department’s IDEA Part C determinations continue to include consideration
Page 2 — Lead Agency Director
of each State’s Child Outcomes data, which measure how children who receive Part C services
are imp roving functioning in three outcome areas that are critical to school readiness:
• p ositive social - emotional skills;
• acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication);
and
• use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs .
Specifically, the Department considered the data quality and the child performance levels in each
State’s Child Outcomes FFY 2018 data .
You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your State’s SPP/APR and other relevant data
by accessing the EMAPS S PP/APR reporting tool using your State - specific log - on information at
https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find, in
Indicators 1 through 10, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is
required to take. The actions that the State is required to take are in two places:
(1) actions related to the correction of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP
Response ” section of the indicator; and
(2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Actions” section of
the indicator.
It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include
language in the “OSEP Re sponse” and/or “Required Actions” sections.
You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments to the Progress
Page:
(1) the State’s RDA Matrix;
(2) the HTDMD document;
(3) a spreadsheet entitled “ 2020 Data Rubric Part C,” which shows how OSEP calculated the
State’s “Timely and Accurate State - Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and
(4) a document entitled “Dispute Resolution 201 8 - 1 9 ,” which includes the IDEA section
618 data that OSEP used to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and
“Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix.
As noted above, the State’s 2020 determination is Needs Assistance. A State’s 2020 RDA
Determination is Needs Assistance if the RDA Percentage is at least 60% but less than 80%. A
State would also be Needs Assistance if its RDA Determination percentage is 80% or above, but
the Department has imposed Special or Specific Conditions on the State’s last three IDEA Part C
grant awards (for FFYs 201 7 , 201 8 , and 2019 ), and those Specific Conditions are in effect at the
time of the 20 20 determination.
The State’s determination for 2019 was also Needs Assistance. In accordance with section
616(e) (1) of the IDEA and 34 C.F.R. § 303.704(a), if a State is determined to need assistance for
two consecutive years, the Secretary must take one or more of the following actions:
Page 3 — Lead Agency Director
(1) advise the State of available sources of technical assistance that may help the State
address the areas in which the State needs assistance and require the State to work with
appropriate entities; and/or
(2) identify the State as a high - risk grantee and impose Special Conditions on the State’s
IDEA Part C grant award.
Pursuant to these requirements, the Secretary is advising the State of available sources of
technical assistance, including OSEP - funded technical assistance centers and resources at the
following website: https://osep.grads360.org/#program/highlighted - resources , and requiring the
State to work with appropriate en tities. In addition, the State should consider accessing technical
assistance from other Department - funded centers such as the Comprehensive Centers with
resources at the following link: https://compcenternetwork.org/states . The Secretary directs the
State to determine the results elements and/or compliance indicators, and improvement
strategies, on which it will focus its use of available technical assistance, in order to impr ove its
performance. We strongly encourage the State to access technical assistance related to those
results elements and compliance indicators for which the State received a score of zero. Your
State must report with its FFY 2019 SPP/APR submission, due F ebruary 1 , 2 021 , on:
(1) the technical assistance sources from which the State received assistance; and
(2) the actions the State took as a result of that technical assistance.
As required by IDEA section 616(e)(7) and 34 C . F . R . § 303.706, your State must notify the
public that the Secretary of Education has taken the above enforcement action, including, at a
minimum, by posting a public notice on its website and distributing the notice to the media and
to early intervention service ( EIS ) programs.
States were required to submit Phase III Year Four of the SSIP by April 1 , 20 20 . OSEP
appreciates the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve results for infants and
toddlers with disabilities and their families. We hav e carefully reviewed and responded to your
submission and will provide additional feedback in the upcoming weeks. Additionally, OSEP
will continue to work with your State as it implements the fifth year of Phase III of the SSIP,
which is due on April 1, 20 21 .
As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State lead
agency’s website, on the performance of each EIS program located in the State on the targets in
the SPP/APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days a fter the State’s submission of its
FFY 2018 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must:
(1) review EIS program performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR;
(2) determine if each EIS program “meets the requirements” of Part C, or “needs assistance,”
“needs inte rvention,” or “needs substantial intervention” in implementing Part C of the
IDEA ;
(3) take appropriate enforcement action; and
(4) inform each EIS program of its determination.
Page 4 — Lead Agency Director
Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the State lead
agency’s website. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that:
(1) includes the State’s determination letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments , and all State
attachments that a re a ccessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973 ; and
(2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities
and their families and looks forward to working with your State over the next year as we
continue our important work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and their
families. Please contact your OSEP State Lead if you have any questions, would like to discuss
this further, or want to requ est technical assistance.
Sincerely,
Laurie VanderPloeg
Director
Office of Special Education Programs
cc: State Part C Coordinator
View File
2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Hawaii
State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data63.03%67.14%67.14%57.69%73.23%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11619873.23%100%72.22%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring.A total of 270 records were selected for on-site monito5401FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LFFY 2016303FFY 2015110FFY 2014101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe three PDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsPercent = [(# of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or commFFY20132014201520162017Target>=90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%Data90.64%89.74%90.06%90.80%95.68%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=90.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 iSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,6Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=53.14%53.14%53.14%53.14%54.00%A153.14%Data53.14%48.92%55.52%56.42%54.30%A22013Target>=79.32%79.32%79.32%79.32%79.50%A279.32%Data79.32%73.39%75.19%73.26%71.40%B12013Target>=70.81%70.81%70.81%70.81%71.00%B170.81%Data70.81%65.94%69.25%69.66%65.16%B22013Target>=65.19%65.19%65.19%6565.50%B265.19%Data65.19%58.72%59.61%55.64%53.59%C12013Target>=67.99%67.99%67.99%67.99%68.50%C167.99%Data67.99%63.68%68.31%71.08%68.47%C22013Target>=80.63%80.63%80.63%80.63%81.50%C280.63%Data80.63%77.12%76.23%77.02%75.1TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=80.00%80.00%Target B1>=71.50%71.50%Target B2>=66.00%66.00%Target C1>=69.00%69.00%Target C2>=82.00%82.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,169Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it988.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers18916.17%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers63153.98%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s70.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortagesa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it25421.73%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers39233.53%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers20017.11%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortages/turnovers which may result in noa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it998.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers31326.78%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56147.99%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - Required Sampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m92.00%92.00%92.00%92.00%A91.0%Data86.94%88.44%90.50%87.38%91.13%B2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%B93.00%Data87.74%88.44%90.14%87.19%92.61%C2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%C93.00%Data83.87%85.13%85.96%82.38%87.50%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=92.00%89.00%Target B>=94.00%89.00%Target C>=94.00%85.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1.1,629Number of respondent families participating in Part C 584A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Staff shortages and staff turnover impacts the program in implementing all aspects of early intervention. When there aYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State has revised the baseline for this indicat20100.96%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%Data0.99%0.91%0.85%0.97%0.97%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.03%0.97%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 117,224FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage14617,2240.97%1.035 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP acFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%Data3.07%2.74%3.11%3.08%3.19%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.63%3.19%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 352,317FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,61952,3173.19%3.6 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a FFY 2019 target for this indicator, and OSEP aHistorical DataBaseline200598.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data90.27%90.27%93.71%91.98%84.99%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0262,15084.99%100%82.70%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6510FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindFFY 2016110FFY 2014110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsB. Notified (consistent with any opt-out policy adopted by the State) the SEA and the LEA where the toddler resides at200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.97%99.10%93.62%93.37%94.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedWhen the Part C LA reviews the8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data91.40%88.81%90.80%92.37%89.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is131030FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaThe programs were notified in writing of any noncompliance. The programs were required to develop a Corrective Action FFY 2015101FFY 2015Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data88.43%90.34%90.41%93.29%95.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we761FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputAPR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1. FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC CertificationInstructionsChoose the apprrobat.Document.DC ent.DC EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data63.03%67.14%67.14%57.69%73.23%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11619873.23%100%72.22%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring.A total of 270 records were selected for on-site monito5401FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LFFY 2016303FFY 2015110FFY 2014101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe three PDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsPercent = [(# of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or commFFY20132014201520162017Target>=90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%Data90.64%89.74%90.06%90.80%95.68%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=90.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 iSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,6Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=53.14%53.14%53.14%53.14%54.00%A153.14%Data53.14%48.92%55.52%56.42%54.30%A22013Target>=79.32%79.32%79.32%79.32%79.50%A279.32%Data79.32%73.39%75.19%73.26%71.40%B12013Target>=70.81%70.81%70.81%70.81%71.00%B170.81%Data70.81%65.94%69.25%69.66%65.16%B22013Target>=65.19%65.19%65.19%6565.50%B265.19%Data65.19%58.72%59.61%55.64%53.59%C12013Target>=67.99%67.99%67.99%67.99%68.50%C167.99%Data67.99%63.68%68.31%71.08%68.47%C22013Target>=80.63%80.63%80.63%80.63%81.50%C280.63%Data80.63%77.12%76.23%77.02%75.1TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=80.00%80.00%Target B1>=71.50%71.50%Target B2>=66.00%66.00%Target C1>=69.00%69.00%Target C2>=82.00%82.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,169Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it988.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers18916.17%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers63153.98%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s70.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortagesa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it25421.73%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers39233.53%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers20017.11%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortages/turnovers which may result in noa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it998.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers31326.78%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56147.99%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - Required Sampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m92.00%92.00%92.00%92.00%A91.0%Data86.94%88.44%90.50%87.38%91.13%B2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%B93.00%Data87.74%88.44%90.14%87.19%92.61%C2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%C93.00%Data83.87%85.13%85.96%82.38%87.50%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=92.00%89.00%Target B>=94.00%89.00%Target C>=94.00%85.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1.1,629Number of respondent families participating in Part C 584A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Staff shortages and staff turnover impacts the program in implementing all aspects of early intervention. When there aYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State has revised the baseline for this indicat20100.96%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%Data0.99%0.91%0.85%0.97%0.97%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.03%0.97%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 117,224FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage14617,2240.97%1.035 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP acFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%Data3.07%2.74%3.11%3.08%3.19%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.63%3.19%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 352,317FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,61952,3173.19%3.6 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a FFY 2019 target for this indicator, and OSEP aHistorical DataBaseline200598.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data90.27%90.27%93.71%91.98%84.99%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0262,15084.99%100%82.70%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6510FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindFFY 2016110FFY 2014110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsB. Notified (consistent with any opt-out policy adopted by the State) the SEA and the LEA where the toddler resides at200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.97%99.10%93.62%93.37%94.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedWhen the Part C LA reviews the8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data91.40%88.81%90.80%92.37%89.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is131030FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaThe programs were notified in writing of any noncompliance. The programs were required to develop a Corrective Action FFY 2015101FFY 2015Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data88.43%90.34%90.41%93.29%95.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we761FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputAPR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1. FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC CertificationInstructionsChoose the apprrobat.Document.DC ent.DC EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data63.03%67.14%67.14%57.69%73.23%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11619873.23%100%72.22%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring.A total of 270 records were selected for on-site monito5401FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LFFY 2016303FFY 2015110FFY 2014101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe three PDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsPercent = [(# of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or commFFY20132014201520162017Target>=90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%Data90.64%89.74%90.06%90.80%95.68%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=90.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 iSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,6Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=53.14%53.14%53.14%53.14%54.00%A153.14%Data53.14%48.92%55.52%56.42%54.30%A22013Target>=79.32%79.32%79.32%79.32%79.50%A279.32%Data79.32%73.39%75.19%73.26%71.40%B12013Target>=70.81%70.81%70.81%70.81%71.00%B170.81%Data70.81%65.94%69.25%69.66%65.16%B22013Target>=65.19%65.19%65.19%6565.50%B265.19%Data65.19%58.72%59.61%55.64%53.59%C12013Target>=67.99%67.99%67.99%67.99%68.50%C167.99%Data67.99%63.68%68.31%71.08%68.47%C22013Target>=80.63%80.63%80.63%80.63%81.50%C280.63%Data80.63%77.12%76.23%77.02%75.1TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=80.00%80.00%Target B1>=71.50%71.50%Target B2>=66.00%66.00%Target C1>=69.00%69.00%Target C2>=82.00%82.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,169Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it988.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers18916.17%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers63153.98%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s70.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortagesa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it25421.73%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers39233.53%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers20017.11%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortages/turnovers which may result in noa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it998.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers31326.78%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56147.99%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - Required Sampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m92.00%92.00%92.00%92.00%A91.0%Data86.94%88.44%90.50%87.38%91.13%B2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%B93.00%Data87.74%88.44%90.14%87.19%92.61%C2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%C93.00%Data83.87%85.13%85.96%82.38%87.50%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=92.00%89.00%Target B>=94.00%89.00%Target C>=94.00%85.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1.1,629Number of respondent families participating in Part C 584A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Staff shortages and staff turnover impacts the program in implementing all aspects of early intervention. When there aYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State has revised the baseline for this indicat20100.96%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%Data0.99%0.91%0.85%0.97%0.97%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.03%0.97%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 117,224FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage14617,2240.97%1.035 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP acFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%Data3.07%2.74%3.11%3.08%3.19%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.63%3.19%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 352,317FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,61952,3173.19%3.6 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a FFY 2019 target for this indicator, and OSEP aHistorical DataBaseline200598.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data90.27%90.27%93.71%91.98%84.99%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0262,15084.99%100%82.70%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6510FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindFFY 2016110FFY 2014110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsB. Notified (consistent with any opt-out policy adopted by the State) the SEA and the LEA where the toddler resides at200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.97%99.10%93.62%93.37%94.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedWhen the Part C LA reviews the8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data91.40%88.81%90.80%92.37%89.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is131030FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaThe programs were notified in writing of any noncompliance. The programs were required to develop a Corrective Action FFY 2015101FFY 2015Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data88.43%90.34%90.41%93.29%95.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we761FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputAPR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1. FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC CertificationInstructionsChoose the apprrobat.Document.DC ent.DC EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data63.03%67.14%67.14%57.69%73.23%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11619873.23%100%72.22%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring.A total of 270 records were selected for on-site monito5401FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LFFY 2016303FFY 2015110FFY 2014101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe three PDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsPercent = [(# of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or commFFY20132014201520162017Target>=90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%Data90.64%89.74%90.06%90.80%95.68%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=90.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 iSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,6Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=53.14%53.14%53.14%53.14%54.00%A153.14%Data53.14%48.92%55.52%56.42%54.30%A22013Target>=79.32%79.32%79.32%79.32%79.50%A279.32%Data79.32%73.39%75.19%73.26%71.40%B12013Target>=70.81%70.81%70.81%70.81%71.00%B170.81%Data70.81%65.94%69.25%69.66%65.16%B22013Target>=65.19%65.19%65.19%6565.50%B265.19%Data65.19%58.72%59.61%55.64%53.59%C12013Target>=67.99%67.99%67.99%67.99%68.50%C167.99%Data67.99%63.68%68.31%71.08%68.47%C22013Target>=80.63%80.63%80.63%80.63%81.50%C280.63%Data80.63%77.12%76.23%77.02%75.1TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=80.00%80.00%Target B1>=71.50%71.50%Target B2>=66.00%66.00%Target C1>=69.00%69.00%Target C2>=82.00%82.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,169Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it988.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers18916.17%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers63153.98%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s70.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortagesa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it25421.73%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers39233.53%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers20017.11%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortages/turnovers which may result in noa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it998.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers31326.78%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56147.99%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - Required Sampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m92.00%92.00%92.00%92.00%A91.0%Data86.94%88.44%90.50%87.38%91.13%B2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%B93.00%Data87.74%88.44%90.14%87.19%92.61%C2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%C93.00%Data83.87%85.13%85.96%82.38%87.50%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=92.00%89.00%Target B>=94.00%89.00%Target C>=94.00%85.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1.1,629Number of respondent families participating in Part C 584A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Staff shortages and staff turnover impacts the program in implementing all aspects of early intervention. When there aYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State has revised the baseline for this indicat20100.96%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%Data0.99%0.91%0.85%0.97%0.97%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.03%0.97%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 117,224FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage14617,2240.97%1.035 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP acFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%Data3.07%2.74%3.11%3.08%3.19%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.63%3.19%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 352,317FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,61952,3173.19%3.6 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a FFY 2019 target for this indicator, and OSEP aHistorical DataBaseline200598.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data90.27%90.27%93.71%91.98%84.99%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0262,15084.99%100%82.70%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6510FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindFFY 2016110FFY 2014110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsB. Notified (consistent with any opt-out policy adopted by the State) the SEA and the LEA where the toddler resides at200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.97%99.10%93.62%93.37%94.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedWhen the Part C LA reviews the8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data91.40%88.81%90.80%92.37%89.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is131030FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaThe programs were notified in writing of any noncompliance. The programs were required to develop a Corrective Action FFY 2015101FFY 2015Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data88.43%90.34%90.41%93.29%95.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we761FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputAPR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1. FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC CertificationInstructionsChoose the apprrobat.Document.DC ent.DC EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data63.03%67.14%67.14%57.69%73.23%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11619873.23%100%72.22%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring.A total of 270 records were selected for on-site monito5401FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LFFY 2016303FFY 2015110FFY 2014101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe three PDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsPercent = [(# of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or commFFY20132014201520162017Target>=90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%Data90.64%89.74%90.06%90.80%95.68%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=90.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 iSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,6Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=53.14%53.14%53.14%53.14%54.00%A153.14%Data53.14%48.92%55.52%56.42%54.30%A22013Target>=79.32%79.32%79.32%79.32%79.50%A279.32%Data79.32%73.39%75.19%73.26%71.40%B12013Target>=70.81%70.81%70.81%70.81%71.00%B170.81%Data70.81%65.94%69.25%69.66%65.16%B22013Target>=65.19%65.19%65.19%6565.50%B265.19%Data65.19%58.72%59.61%55.64%53.59%C12013Target>=67.99%67.99%67.99%67.99%68.50%C167.99%Data67.99%63.68%68.31%71.08%68.47%C22013Target>=80.63%80.63%80.63%80.63%81.50%C280.63%Data80.63%77.12%76.23%77.02%75.1TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=80.00%80.00%Target B1>=71.50%71.50%Target B2>=66.00%66.00%Target C1>=69.00%69.00%Target C2>=82.00%82.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,169Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it988.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers18916.17%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers63153.98%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s70.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortagesa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it25421.73%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers39233.53%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers20017.11%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortages/turnovers which may result in noa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it998.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers31326.78%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56147.99%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - Required Sampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m92.00%92.00%92.00%92.00%A91.0%Data86.94%88.44%90.50%87.38%91.13%B2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%B93.00%Data87.74%88.44%90.14%87.19%92.61%C2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%C93.00%Data83.87%85.13%85.96%82.38%87.50%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=92.00%89.00%Target B>=94.00%89.00%Target C>=94.00%85.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1.1,629Number of respondent families participating in Part C 584A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Staff shortages and staff turnover impacts the program in implementing all aspects of early intervention. When there aYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State has revised the baseline for this indicat20100.96%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%Data0.99%0.91%0.85%0.97%0.97%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.03%0.97%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 117,224FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage14617,2240.97%1.035 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP acFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%Data3.07%2.74%3.11%3.08%3.19%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.63%3.19%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 352,317FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,61952,3173.19%3.6 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a FFY 2019 target for this indicator, and OSEP aHistorical DataBaseline200598.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data90.27%90.27%93.71%91.98%84.99%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0262,15084.99%100%82.70%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6510FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindFFY 2016110FFY 2014110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsB. Notified (consistent with any opt-out policy adopted by the State) the SEA and the LEA where the toddler resides at200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.97%99.10%93.62%93.37%94.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedWhen the Part C LA reviews the8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data91.40%88.81%90.80%92.37%89.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is131030FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaThe programs were notified in writing of any noncompliance. The programs were required to develop a Corrective Action FFY 2015101FFY 2015Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data88.43%90.34%90.41%93.29%95.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we761FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputAPR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1. FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC CertificationInstructionsChoose the apprrobat.Document.DC ent.DC EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data63.03%67.14%67.14%57.69%73.23%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11619873.23%100%72.22%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring.A total of 270 records were selected for on-site monito5401FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LFFY 2016303FFY 2015110FFY 2014101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe three PDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsPercent = [(# of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or commFFY20132014201520162017Target>=90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%90.00%Data90.64%89.74%90.06%90.80%95.68%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=90.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 iSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,6Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=53.14%53.14%53.14%53.14%54.00%A153.14%Data53.14%48.92%55.52%56.42%54.30%A22013Target>=79.32%79.32%79.32%79.32%79.50%A279.32%Data79.32%73.39%75.19%73.26%71.40%B12013Target>=70.81%70.81%70.81%70.81%71.00%B170.81%Data70.81%65.94%69.25%69.66%65.16%B22013Target>=65.19%65.19%65.19%6565.50%B265.19%Data65.19%58.72%59.61%55.64%53.59%C12013Target>=67.99%67.99%67.99%67.99%68.50%C167.99%Data67.99%63.68%68.31%71.08%68.47%C22013Target>=80.63%80.63%80.63%80.63%81.50%C280.63%Data80.63%77.12%76.23%77.02%75.1TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=80.00%80.00%Target B1>=71.50%71.50%Target B2>=66.00%66.00%Target C1>=69.00%69.00%Target C2>=82.00%82.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,169Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it988.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers18916.17%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers63153.98%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s70.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortagesa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it25421.73%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers39233.53%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers20017.11%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Slippage may be due to staff shortages/turnovers which may result in noa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it998.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers31326.78%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56147.99%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - Required Sampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m92.00%92.00%92.00%92.00%A91.0%Data86.94%88.44%90.50%87.38%91.13%B2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%B93.00%Data87.74%88.44%90.14%87.19%92.61%C2006Target>=94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%C93.00%Data83.87%85.13%85.96%82.38%87.50%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=92.00%89.00%Target B>=94.00%89.00%Target C>=94.00%85.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1.1,629Number of respondent families participating in Part C 584A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Staff shortages and staff turnover impacts the program in implementing all aspects of early intervention. When there aYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State has revised the baseline for this indicat20100.96%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%1.03%Data0.99%0.91%0.85%0.97%0.97%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.03%0.97%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 117,224FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage14617,2240.97%1.035 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP acFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%2.82%Data3.07%2.74%3.11%3.08%3.19%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.63%3.19%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input APR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 incPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 352,317FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,61952,3173.19%3.6 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a FFY 2019 target for this indicator, and OSEP aHistorical DataBaseline200598.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data90.27%90.27%93.71%91.98%84.99%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0262,15084.99%100%82.70%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6510FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindFFY 2016110FFY 2014110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsB. Notified (consistent with any opt-out policy adopted by the State) the SEA and the LEA where the toddler resides at200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.97%99.10%93.62%93.37%94.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitData collected for the full reporting period (7/1/18 6/30/19).Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infa6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedWhen the Part C LA reviews the8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data91.40%88.81%90.80%92.37%89.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is131030FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaThe programs were notified in writing of any noncompliance. The programs were required to develop a Corrective Action FFY 2015101FFY 2015Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe one Program with on-going noncompliance was required to complete the LAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data88.43%90.34%90.41%93.29%95.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we761FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputAPR ProcessThe process to develop Hawaii's APR for FFY 2018 included:1. FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC CertificationInstructionsChoose the apprrobat.Document.DC ent.DC EMBED Acrobat.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13
(Grant Year 2018–2019 — Issued June 23, 2020)
How the department made determinations
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-80770 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on September 15, 2020