POLICY LETTER: September 29, 2014 to Sam Sutton and David Rubel
Home » Policy Documents » POLICY LETTER: September 29, 2014 to Sam Sutton and David Rubel
MS Word
MS WORDPDF
PDFView File
MS Word
esktop/DOE_Logo_small.gif" * MERGEFORMAT United States Department of EducationOffice of Special Education And Rehabilitative ServicesSeptember 29, 2014Sam SuttonPresidentTeach NYS150 Broadway, Suite 901New York, NY 10038David RubelConsultantTeach NYS and Sephardic Community Federation215 17th StreetBrooklyn, NY 11215Dear Mr. Sutton and Mr. Rubel,Thank you for contacting the Office of Non-Public Education (ONPE) in the U.S. Department of Education (Department) asking whether special education and related services for children with disabilities enrolled by their parents in private schools could be delivered using inclusion models that you describe in your letter. ONPE has referred your inquiry to the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), the office in the Department responsible for administering the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), for a response. OSEP recognizes and supports the importance of inclusive educational practices, as you do. Indeed, research has demonstrated that students with disabilities do better when they are given the opportunity to be educated and interact in extracurricular and nonacademic settings with their nondisabled peers. Therefore, as a general matter, we believe that in meetinv400 MARYLAND AVE., SW, WASHINGTON, DC 20202The Department of Education's mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.Assuming that a parentally-placed private school child is an eligible child with a disability, as defined in 34 CFR 300.8, and that such child has been designated to receive services under the equitable services provisions of the IDEA, a services plan must be developed for the child. The services plan must include the specific special education and related services to be provided to the child in light of the services that the LEA has determined, through the consultation process, it will make available to its parentally-placed private school children with disabilities. Further, a services plan, must, to the extent appropriate, reflect the IEP content requirements in 34 CFR 300.320. Under 34 CFR 300.320(a)(4)-(5), the IEP must address the extent to which a child with a disability will participate and be educated with children with and without disabilities in the general education curriculum and in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities. As you know, under 34 CFR 300.134, the LEA where the private schooMelody Musgrove, Ed.D.DirectorOffice of Special Education Programs This clarification was provided in a response to a public comment in the Analysis of Comments and Changes to the Department's March 12, 1999 final Part B regulations. See Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and the Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities, Final Rule, 64 Fed. Reg. 12406, 12605 (Mar. 12, 1999).Page PAGE 2 Mr. Sam Sutton and Mr. David Rubelesktop/DOE_Logo_small.gif" * MERGEFORMAT United States Department of EducationOffice of Special Education And Rehabilitative ServicesSeptember 29, 2014Sam SuttonPresidentTeach NYS150 Broadway, Suite 901New York, NY 10038David RubelConsultantTeach NYS and Sephardic Community Federation215 17th StreetBrooklyn, NY 11215Dear Mr. Sutton and Mr. Rubel,Thank you for contacting the Office of Non-Public Education (ONPE) in the U.S. Department of Education (Department) asking whether special education and related services for children with disabilities enrolled by their parents in private schools could be delivered using inclusion models that you describe in your letter. ONPE has referred your inquiry to the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), the office in the Department responsible for administering the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), for a response. OSEP recognizes and supports the importance of inclusive educational practices, as you do. Indeed, research has demonstrated that students with disabilities do better when they are given the opportunity to be educated and interact in extracurricular and nonacademic settings with their nondisabled peers. Therefore, as a general matter, we believe that in meetinv400 MARYLAND AVE., SW, WASHINGTON, DC 20202The Department of Education's mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.Assuming that a parentally-placed private school child is an eligible child with a disability, as defined in 34 CFR 300.8, and that such child has been designated to receive services under the equitable services provisions of the IDEA, a services plan must be developed for the child. The services plan must include the specific special education and related services to be provided to the child in light of the services that the LEA has determined, through the consultation process, it will make available to its parentally-placed private school children with disabilities. Further, a services plan, must, to the extent appropriate, reflect the IEP content requirements in 34 CFR 300.320. Under 34 CFR 300.320(a)(4)-(5), the IEP must address the extent to which a child with a disability will participate and be educated with children with and without disabilities in the general education curriculum and in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities. As you know, under 34 CFR 300.134, the LEA where the private schooMelody Musgrove, Ed.D.DirectorOffice of Special Education Programs This clarification was provided in a response to a public comment in the Analysis of Comments and Changes to the Department's March 12, 1999 final Part B regulations. See Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and the Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities, Final Rule, 64 Fed. Reg. 12406, 12605 (Mar. 12, 1999).Page PAGE 2 Mr. Sam Sutton and Mr. David Rubel
View PDF
PDF
U
NITED STATES D EPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
September 29, 2014
Sam Sutton
President
Teach NYS
150 Broadway, Suite 901
New York, NY 10038
David Rubel
Consultant
Teach NYS and Sephardic Community Federation
215 17
th Street
Brooklyn, NY 11215
Dear Mr. Sutton and Mr. Rubel,
Thank you for contacting the Office of Non- Public Education (ONPE) in the U.S. Department of
Educ ation (Department) asking whether special education and related services for children with
disabilities enrolled by their parents in private schools could be delivered using inclusion models
that you describe in your letter. ONPE has referred your inquiry to the Office of Special
Education Programs (OSEP), the office in the Department responsible for administering the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), for a response.
OSEP recognizes and supports the importance of inclusive educational practices, as you do.
Indeed, research has demonstrated that students with disabilities do better when they are given
the opportunity to be educated and interact in extracurricular and nonacademic settings with their
nondisabled peers. Therefore, as a ge neral matter, we believe that in meeting IDEA’s equitable
services requirements, it is important for local educational agencies (LEAs) where private,
including religious, elementary and secondary schools are located, to ensure that services
provided to par entally-placed private school children with disabilities include opportunities for
their meaningful participation in the general curriculum and promote student growth. That said,
we cannot endorse any particular instructional model, such as the collaborat ive teaching models
you outlined in your letter, because determinations regarding particular instructional models are
matters that rest with State and local officials. Further, with regard to equitable services, under
IDEA, the consultation process is the vehicle for determining the types and amounts of services,
including the manner in which those services are provided. This process and the other IDEA
requirements that govern the provision of equitable services to parentally -placed private school
childre n with disabilities are described below.
www.ed.gov
400 MARYLAND AVE., SW, WASHINGTON, DC 20202
The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by
foster ing educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Page 2 – Mr. Sam Sutton and Mr. David Rubel
Assuming that a parentally -placed private school child is an eligible child with a disability, as
defined in 34 CFR §300.8, and that such child has been designated to receive services under the
equitabl e services provisions of the IDEA, a services plan must be developed for the child. The
services plan must include the specific special education and related services to be provided to
the child in light of the services that the LEA has determined, throug h the consultation process, it
will make available to its parentally -placed private school children with disabilities. Further, a
services plan, must, to the extent appropriate, reflect the IEP content requirements in 34 CFR
§300.320. Under 34 CFR §300.320(a)(4) -(5), the IEP must address the extent to which a child
with a disability will participate and be educated with children with and without disabilities in
the general education curriculum and in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities.
As you know, under 34 CFR §300.134, the LEA where the private school is located, or if
appropriate, the State educational agency (SEA), must consult with private school
representatives and representatives of parents of parentally -placed private school childr en with
disabilities during the design and development of special education and related services. The
consultation process is very important because discussions between public school and private
school representatives and parents must address, among othe r matters: how parentally-placed
private school children with disabilities identified through the child find process can
meaningfully participate in special education and related services; how, where, and by whom
special education and related services wil l be provided; and the types of services to be provided,
including direct services and alternate service delivery mechanisms. 34 CFR §300.134(d)(1).
The LEA where the private school is located must make the final decisions with respect to the
services pr ovided to eligible parentally -placed private school children with disabilities. 34 CFR
§300.137(b)(2). In addition, the special education and related services provided must be secular,
neutral, and nonideological. 34 CFR §300.138(c)(2).
In addition, equitable services for parentally -placed private school children with disabilities may
be provided on the premises of private, including religious, schools, to the extent consistent with
law. 34 CFR §300.139(a). The Department generally believes that, unless there is a compelling
rationale for these services to be provided off -site, LEAs should provide services on- site, at the
child’s private school, so as not to unduly disrupt the child’s educational experience. See
Question F -1,
Questions and Answers on Serving Children with Disabilities Placed By Their
Parents in Private Schools (April 2011).
It is our understanding that you would like to present the six collaborative teaching models
described in your letter to public school officials for possible use in connection with the
provision of equitable services to parentally -placed private school children with disabilities
under IDEA. You believe the first three models presented in your letter may be consistent with
the IDEA regulations, and the latter three were designed for children with disabilities, but also
m ay indirectly benefit the general needs of students enrolled in the private school. We assume
you are suggesting that you believe that these models would confer what we refer to as an
“incidental benefit” on the private school children not receiving equit able services under the
IDEA. See generally 34 CFR §300.208 (permissive use of IDEA funds). It is important to note
that in providing or arranging for the provision of equitable services, an LEA may not use IDEA
Part B funds to finance the existing level of instruction in a private school or to otherwise benefit
the private school. Rather, the LEA must use IDEA Part B funds to meet the special education
and related services needs of parentally -placed private school children with disabilities, and not
to meet the needs of the private school or the general needs of the students enrolled in the private
school. 34 CFR §300.141. Therefore, LEAs should use reasonable measures in assessing
whether Federal funds are being used to benefit private schools. See 64 Fed. Reg. 12406, 12605
Page 3 – Mr. Sam Sutton and Mr. David Rubel
(Mar. 12, 1999).
1 The Department has previously advised that 34 CFR §300.141 would not
prohibit other children in the private school from deriving a benefit that is incidental to the
provision of the Federally -funded special educa tion and related services to those parentally -
placed private school children with disabilities designated to receive services under IDEA. For
example, if consultation services are provided to a private school teacher as a means of providing
special educat ion and related services to a particular parentally -placed private school student
with a disability and that teacher uses the acquired skills in providing education to other children,
whatever benefit those other children receive is incidental to the provi sion of special education
and related services and is not prohibited by 34 CFR §300.141. 64 Fed. Reg. 12605.
As noted previously, we cannot endorse any particular instructional model, and therefore express
no view as to whether any of the collaborative teaching models described in your letter could be
implemented in a manner that would confer only an incidental benefit on the other children in the
private school. Rather, we believe a careful analysis of the particular facts and circumstances
would need to be undertaken in making such a determination, and therefore suggest that you
explore this matter with State and local officials through the consultation process described
above.
Based on section 607(e) of the IDEA, we are informing you that our response is provided as
informal guidance and is not legally binding, but represents an interpretation by the U.S.
Department of Education of the IDEA in the context of the specific facts presented.
We hope this information is helpful to you as you continue to work with the local public school
districts and the State of New York to support the effective implementation of equitable services
under IDEA for eligible children with disabilities enrolled by their parents in private schools.
Should you have additi onal questions or require further clarification, please contact Dwight
Thomas, Office of Special Education Programs at 202- 245-6238,or Pamela Allen, Office of
Non -Public Education at 202- 205-9012, directly.
Sincerely,
/s/ Melody Musgrove
Melody Musgrove, Ed.D.
Director
Office of Special Education Programs
1 This clarification was provided in a response to a public comment in the Analysis of Comments and Changes to the
Department’s March 12, 1999 final Part B regulations. See Assistance to States for the Education of Children with
Disabilities and the Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities, Final Rule, 64 Fed. Reg.
12406, 12605 (Mar. 12, 1999).
TOPIC: Parentally-placed Private School Students
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-43505 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on April 19, 2017