POLICY LETTER: September 12, 2002 to Louisiana Assistant Legislative Auditor David K. Greer
Home » Policy Documents » POLICY LETTER: September 12, 2002 to Louisiana Assistant Legislative Auditor David K. Greer
September 12, 2002 to Louisiana Assistant Legislative Auditor David K. Greer (MS Word)
MS WORDSeptember 12, 2002 to Louisiana Assistant Legislative Auditor David K. Greer (PDF)
MS WORDView File
September 12, 2002 to Louisiana Assistant Legislative Auditor David K. Greer (MS Word)
Mr. David K. GreerAssistant Legislative AuditorOffice of Legislative AuditorState of LouisianaP.O. Box 94397Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9397Dear Mr. Greer:This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 2002 to Assistant Secretary Robert Pasternack, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS). You requested a legal opinion on whether a particular provision of State law would prohibit Louisiana's independent administrative law judge panel from conducting due process hearings under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and whether the IDEA itself would prohibit the State's administrative law judge panel from holding those hearings.Generally, neither the courts nor OSERS have interpreted the conducted by' language in 20 USC 1415(f)(1) and (g) to literally mean that only individuals under contract to the State educational agency (SEA) or local educational agency (LEA) can preside at IDEA due process hearings. In a State with a one-tier system, it would not be inconsistent with IDEA, if the State Educational Agency (SEA) used an administrative law system to administer the due process system under IDEA as long as the requirements of IDEA are met, including the requirements of 34 CFR 300.508 through 300.511. In a State with a two-tier system, it would not be inconsistent with IDEA if the SEA used an administrative law system to administer the impartial appeal process under IDEA so long as the requirements of IDEA, including the regulatory provisions mentioned above, are met.As a general matter, the Office of Special Education Programs does not interpret State law, or opine about its application, unless State law appears to conflict with Federal requirements. You may wish to direct this aspect of your inquiry to appropriate State legal officials. I hope this information is helpful to you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. JoLeta Reynolds at (202) 205-5507.Sincerely,Stephanie S. LeeDirectorOffice of Special Education Programs
View File
September 12, 2002 to Louisiana Assistant Legislative Auditor David K. Greer (PDF)
Mr. David K. GreerAssistant Legislative AuditorOffice of Legislative AuditorState of LouisianaP.O. Box 94397Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9397Dear Mr. Greer:This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 2002 to Assistant Secretary Robert Pasternack, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS). You requested a legal opinion on whether a particular provision of State law would prohibit Louisiana's independent administrative law judge panel from conducting due process hearings under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and whether the IDEA itself would prohibit the State's administrative law judge panel from holding those hearings.Generally, neither the courts nor OSERS have interpreted the conducted by' language in 20 USC 1415(f)(1) and (g) to literally mean that only individuals under contract to the State educational agency (SEA) or local educational agency (LEA) can preside at IDEA due process hearings. In a State with a one-tier system, it would not be inconsistent with IDEA, if the State Educational Agency (SEA) used an administrative law system to administer the due process system under IDEA as long as the requirements of IDEA are met, including the requirements of 34 CFR 300.508 through 300.511. In a State with a two-tier system, it would not be inconsistent with IDEA if the SEA used an administrative law system to administer the impartial appeal process under IDEA so long as the requirements of IDEA, including the regulatory provisions mentioned above, are met.As a general matter, the Office of Special Education Programs does not interpret State law, or opine about its application, unless State law appears to conflict with Federal requirements. You may wish to direct this aspect of your inquiry to appropriate State legal officials. I hope this information is helpful to you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. JoLeta Reynolds at (202) 205-5507.Sincerely,Stephanie S. LeeDirectorOffice of Special Education Programs
TOPIC ADDRESSED: Due Process Hearings |
SECTION OF IDEA: Part B—Assistance for Education of All Children With Disabilities; Section 615—Procedural Safeguards
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-47066 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on April 27, 2017