POLICY LETTER: May 26, 2004 to Education Law Center Staff Attorney Shari A. Mamas
Home » Policy Documents » POLICY LETTER: May 26, 2004 to Education Law Center Staff Attorney Shari A. Mamas
May 26, 2004 to Education Law Center Staff Attorney Shari A. Mamas (MS Word)
MS WORDMay 26, 2004 to Education Law Center Staff Attorney Shari A. Mamas (PDF)
PDFView File
May 26, 2004 to Education Law Center Staff Attorney Shari A. Mamas (MS Word)
Dated May 26, 2004Ms. Shari A. MamasStaff AttorneyEducation Law Center1901 Law and Finance Building429 Fourth AvenuePittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219Dear Ms. Mamas:This is in response to your letter to the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) and the Family Policy Compliance Office (FPCO) regarding the rights of parents of a child with a disability and their representatives to observe their child in a special or regular education classroom. It is our understanding that the FPCO addressed your questions regarding the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in a December 8, 2003 letter to you. Regarding your question to OSEP, you ask that OSEP provide an opinion on whether the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees parents and their representatives a reasonable opportunity to observe their children's classrooms and proposed placement options. In your letter you state that it is the Education Law Center's position that a school district's refusal to allow parents and their professional representatives to observe their children in a special education classroom violates the parents' rights under the IDEA to be full and equal participants in the development of an appropriate individualized education program (IEP) for their children. One of the key purposes of the IDEA Amendments of 1997 is to strengthen and expand the role of parents in the identification, evaluation, and educational placement of their child. The IDEA specifically provides that the parents of a child with disabilities: have an opportunity to participate in meetings with respect to the identification, evaluation, and educational placement of their child, and the provision of a free appropriate public education to their child (300.501(b), 300.344(a)(1), and 300.517)); be part of any group that determines what additional data are needed as part of an evaluation of their child (300.533(a)(1)), and determine their child's eligibility (300.534(a)(1)) and educational placement (300.501(c)); have their concerns and the information that they provide regarding their child considered in developing and reviewing their child's IEP (300.343(c)(iii) and 300.346(a)(1)(i) and (b)); and be regularly informed, as specified in their child's IEP, at least as often as parents are informed of their nondisabled children's progress, of their child's progress toward the annual goals in the IEP and the extent to which that progress is sufficient to enable the child to achieve the goals by the end of the year (300.347(a)(7)). While the IDEA expects parents of children with disabilities to have an expanded role in the evaluation and educational placement of their children and be participants, along with school personnel, in developing, reviewing, and revising the IEPs for their children, neither the statute nor the regulations implementing the IDEA provide a general entitlement for parents of children with disabilities, or their professional representatives, to observe their children in any current classroom or proposed educational placement. The determination of who has access to classrooms may be addressed by State and/or local policy. However, we encourage school district personnel and parents to work together in ways that meet the needs of both the parents and the school, including providing opportunities for parents to observe their children's classrooms and proposed placement options. In addition, there may be circumstances in which access may need to be provided. For example, if parents invoke their right to an independent educational evaluation of their child, and the evaluation requires observing the child in the educational placement, the evaluator may need to be provided access to the placement.Regarding your question about the applicability of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) to your question, it is our understanding that the provision that you cite (20 U.S.C. 6318(a)(2)) applies only to Title I schools. If you wish to follow-up on your NCLB question, please feel free to contact Lorraine Wise at (202) 260-1406. We hope this information is helpful. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact Dale King at (202) 260-1156.Sincerely,/s/ Stephanie Smith LeeDirectorOffice of Special Education Programscc:LeRoy S. RookerDirector, Family Policy and Compliance OfficeLorraine WiseOffice of Elementary and Secondary EducationDr. Frances WarkomskiDirector, Pennsylvania Bureau of Special EducationPage PAGE 2 Ms. Shari A. Mamas
View PDF
May 26, 2004 to Education Law Center Staff Attorney Shari A. Mamas (PDF)
Ms
. Shari A
. Mamas
Staff Attorney
Education Law Center
1901 Law and Finance Building
429 Fourth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219
Dear Ms . Mamas
:
This is in response to your letter to the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) and
the Family Policy Compliance Office (FPCO) regarding the rights of parents of a child
with a disability and their representatives to observe their child in a special or regular
education classroom
. It is our understanding that the FPCO addressed your questions
regarding the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in a December 8,
2003 letter to you
.
Regarding your question to OSEP, you ask that OSEP provide an opinion on whether the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees parents and their
representatives a reasonable opportunity to observe their children's classrooms and
proposed placement options
. In your letter you state that it is the Education Law Center's
position that "a school district's refusal to allow parents and their professional
representatives to observe their children in a special education classroom violates the
parents' rights under the IDEA to be full and equal participants in the development of an
appropriate individualized education program (IEP) for their children
."
One of the key purposes of the IDEA Amendments of 1997 is to strengthen and expand
the role of parents in the identification, evaluation, and educational placement of their
child
. The IDEA specifically provides that the parents of a child with disabilities
:
(1) have an opportunity to participate in meetings with respect to the identification,
evaluation, and educational placement of their child, and the provision of a free
appropriate public education to their child (§§300 .501(b), 300
.344(a)(1), and
300
.517))
;
(2) be part of any group that determines what additional data are needed as part of an
evaluation of their child (§300
.533(a)(1)), and determine their child's eligibility
(§300
.534(a)(1)) and educational placement (§300
.501(c))
;
(3) have their concerns and the information that they provide regarding their child
considered in developing and reviewing their child's IEP (§§300
.343(c)(iii) and
300
.346(a)(1)(i) and
(b))
;
and
(4) be regularly informed, as specified in their child's IEP, at least as often as parents
are informed of their nondisabled children's progress, of their child's progress
400 MARYLAND AVE
.,
S.W
.,
WASHINGTON, D
.C
. 20202
w
ww
.ed
.gov
Our mission is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the Nation
.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
MAY
2 6 2004
Page 2
- Ms
. Shari A
. Mamas
toward the annual goals in the IEP and the extent to which that progress is
sufficient to enable the child to achieve the goals by the end of the year
(§300
.347(a)(7))
.
While the IDEA expects parents of children with disabilities to have an expanded role in
the evaluation and educational placement of their children and be participants, along with
school personnel, in developing, reviewing, and revising the IEPs for their children,
neither the statute nor the regulations implementing the IDEA provide a general
entitlement for parents of children with disabilities, or their professional representatives,
to observe their children in any current classroom or proposed educational placement
.
The determination of who has access to classrooms may be addressed by State and/or
local policy
. However, we encourage school district personnel and parents to work
together in ways that meet the needs of both the parents and the school, including
providing opportunities for parents to observe their children's classrooms and proposed
placement options
. In addition, there may be circumstances in which access may need to
be provided
. For example, if parents invoke their right to an independent educational
evaluation of their child, and the evaluation requires observing the child in the
educational placement, the evaluator may need to be provided access to the placement
.
Regarding your question about the applicability of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
to your question, it is our understanding that the provision that you cite (20 U
.S
.C
.
§6318(a)(2)) applies only to Title I schools
. If you wish to follow-up on your NCLB
question, please feel free to contact Lorraine Wise at (202) 260-1406
.
We hope this information is helpful
. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel
free to contact Dale King at (202) 260-1156
.
Sincerely,
,W
*Y
4,
ov
-
Stephanie Smith
Le~~ly (/l
G4
d
~~
e
Director
Office of Special Education Programs
cc
: LeRoy S
. Rooker
Director, Family Policy and Compliance Office
Lorraine Wise
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
Dr
. Frances Warkomski
Director, Pennsylvania Bureau of Special Education
TOPIC ADDRESSED: Educational Placements |
SECTION OF IDEA: Part B—Assistance for Education of All Children With Disabilities; Section 614—Evaluations, Eligibility Determinations, Individualized Education Programs, and Educational Placements
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-46849 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on April 27, 2017