POLICY LETTER: June 22, 2005 to New Mexico Public Education Department Director of Special Education Denise Koscielniak
Home » Policy Documents » POLICY LETTER: June 22, 2005 to New Mexico Public Education Department Director of Special Education Denise Koscielniak
June 22, 2005 to New Mexico Public Education Department Director of Special Education Denise Koscielniak (MS Word)
MS WORDJune 22, 2005 to New Mexico Public Education Department Director of Special Education Denise Koscielniak (PDF)
PDFView File
June 22, 2005 to New Mexico Public Education Department Director of Special Education Denise Koscielniak (MS Word)
Dated June 22, 2005Ms. Denise KoscielniakNew Mexico Public Education Department300 Don GasparSanta Fe, New Mexico 87501-2786Dear Ms. Koscielniak:This letter is in response to a request to the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) for clarification regarding New Mexico Public Education Department's (NMPED) kindergarten screening program, known as the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Literacy Skills (DIBELS) and Federal requirements related to the participation of children with disabilities in State and district-wide assessments. In October 2004, a representative from your Office e-mailed the following questions regarding this issue to a member of my staff:Is the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) considered a State-wide, State-mandated assessment under 34 CFR 300.138 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which would require states to develop an Alternate Assessment and guidelines for participation?If the DIBELS does fall under the category of a State-mandated assessment, how would we identify or develop an Alternate Assessment to a screening instrument such as the DIBELS?As explained more fully below, OSEP has determined that the application of the DIBELS to students in all-day kindergarten programs in New Mexico constitutes a general State assessment program, as described in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (IDEA 97) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act Amendments of 2004 (IDEA). Therefore, the State is required to include all kindergarten children with disabilities in the screening program, using appropriate accommodations and alternate assessments where necessary. Any guidelines developed and implemented by the State related to alternate assessments of children with disabilities in all-day kindergarten programs in New Mexico must be consistent with the IDEA requirements described below.Participation IssuesIt is our understanding from conversations with members of your staff and information posted on your website that teachers in all-day kindergarten programs and Reading First schools are required to administer the DIBELS as a progress monitoring tool for children in those programs. In New Mexico, all-day kindergarten programs are mandated on a statewide basis in all school districts in the State. The DIBELS was designed to be an early literacy-screening instrument that measures skills such as phonological awareness, the alphabetic principle, and fluency with connected text. NMPED uses the DIBELS to measure and report performance against the State's Language Arts Content Standards, Benchmarks, and Performance Standards in reading and early literacy. Because it is apparent that the DIBELS is part of New Mexico's accountability system for children in kindergarten, and that the progress of children with and without disabilities is measured using the DIBELS, OSEP believes that the DIBELS is a statewide assessment program under applicable provisions of the amended IDEA and the current provisions of IDEA 97.The current regulations for Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Part B), which implement the IDEA Amendments of 1997, require that children with disabilities are included in general State and district-wide assessment programs, with appropriate accommodations and modifications in administration, if necessary. 34 CFR 300.138(a). Under those regulations, States have developed guidelines for the participation of children in alternate assessments for those children who could not participate in State and district-wide assessment programs. 34 CFR 300.138(b). Further, each child's individualized education program (IEP) must include [a] statement of any individual modifications in the administration of State or district-wide assessments of student achievement that are needed in order for the child to participate in the assessment. If the IEP team determines that the student will not participate in a particular assessment or part of an assessment, the IEP must contain a statement of why the assessment is not appropriate for the child and how the child will be assessed. The Part B regulations also include reporting requirements at 34 CFR 300.139. 34 CFR 300.347(a)(5). The provisions in the amended IDEA relating to assessments, which become effective on July 1, 2005, provide additional clarification regarding the participation of children with disabilities in State and district-wide assessment programs, and state in the provision regarding participation in assessments at section 612(a)(16)(A) that [a]ll children with disabilities are included in all general State and district-wide assessment programs, including assessments described under section 1111 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, with appropriate accommodations and alternate assessments where necessary and as indicated in their respective individualized education programs. [emphasis added].With respect to accommodations, section 612(a)(16)(B) of the amended IDEA provides that the State, or in the case of a district-wide assessment, the local educational agency, has developed guidelines for the provision of appropriate accommodations. With respect to alternate assessments, section 612(a)(16)(C)(i) provides further that the State, or in the case of a district-wide assessment, the local educational agency, has developed and implemented guidelines for the participation of children with disabilities in alternate assessments for those children who cannot participate in regular assessments with accommodations as indicated in their respective individualized education programs. Under section 612(a)(16(C)(ii), these guidelines must provide for alternate assessments that [a]re aligned with the State's challenging academic content standards and challenging student academic achievement standards. IEP Requirements relating to AssessmentsUnder the individualized education program (IEP) provisions in the amended IDEA, which become effective on July 1, 2005, there are new requirements for IEP teams to follow with respect to State and district-wide assessments. Under section 614(d)(1)(A)(vi)(aa), IEPs must include a statement of any individual appropriate accommodations that are necessary to measure academic achievement and functional performance of a child on State and districtwide assessments, consistent with section 612(a)(16)(A). Section 612(d)(1)(A)(vi)(bb)(AA)-(BB) provides that if the IEP team determines that a child must take an alternate assessment for a particular State or districtwide assessment of student achievement, the IEP must contain a statement of why the child cannot participate in the assessment and why the particular alternate assessment selected is appropriate for the child. Alternate Assessments It is our understanding that, although all children in all-day kindergarten programs in New Mexico are required to participate in the DIBELS, the State does not have a statewide alternate assessment to the DIBELS for children with disabilities for whom the IEP team has determined the DIBELS is not appropriate. Through phone conferences with NMPED staff, OSEP learned that, although the expectation is that all children in kindergarten participate, the State is not sure how many or what forms of alternate screening instruments are being used for children with disabilities who do not participate in the DIBELS. It is OSEP's understanding, through phone conferences and a review of NMPED's Guidance Memorandum of November 22, 2004, that IEP teams determine how kindergarten children with disabilities will participate in the screening program. According to the Memorandum, The IEP team has three options: (1) participation in the DIBELS without allowable accommodations; (2) participation in the DIBELS with allowable accommodations; or (3) participation in another form of assessment identified by the IEP team as a more appropriate means of measuring the student's literacy development. However, as noted above, since OSEP considers the DIBELS to be a statewide assessment under section 612(a)(16)(A) of the amended IDEA, NMPED must develop and implement guidelines for the participation of children with disabilities in alternate assessments, and it is these State guidelines that will enable IEP teams to make decisions in this regard for kindergarten children in New Mexico who are unable to take the DIBELS with individual appropriate accommodations.Performance and Reporting IssuesThe DIBELS provides, through five subtests given three times during the kindergarten year, information that determines a child to be either at risk or not at risk in the development of literacy skills. NMPED staff reported to OSEP that all kindergarten children who participate in an alternate to the DIBELS are determined to be in the at risk category. Currently, the State is reporting to the public on the performance of children in kindergarten programs aSincerely,/s/Troy R. JustesenActing DirectorOffice of Special Education ProgramsPage PAGE 4 Ms. Denise Koscielniak
TOPIC ADDRESSED: Participation of Children With Disabilities in State and District-Wide Assessments |
SECTION OF IDEA: Part B—Assistance for Education of All Children With Disabilities; Section 612—State Eligibility
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-46709 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on May 9, 2017