2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Texas
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
PDF2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Texas
MS WORDView PDF
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600
www.ed.gov
The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by
fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION
O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES
June 23, 20 20
Honorable Phil Wilson
Acting Executive Commissioner
Texas Health and Human Services
4900 North Lamar Boulevard
Austin , Texas 78751
Dear Acting Executive Commissioner Wilson :
I am writing to advise you of the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) 2020
determination under section s 616 and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA). The Department has determined that Texas meets the requirements and purposes of
Part C of the IDEA. This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data and
information, in cluding the Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 State Performance Plan/Annual
Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State - reported data, and other publicly available
information.
Your State’s 2020 determination is based on the data reflected in the State’s “ 2020 Part C
Results - Driven Accountability Matrix” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for
each State and consists of:
(1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other
compliance factors;
(2) Results Components and Appendices that include scoring on Results Elements;
(3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score;
(4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Complia nce Score and the Results Score; and
(5) the State’s Determination.
The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made
Determinations under Sections 616(d) and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
in 2020 : P art C” (HTDMD).
The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is continuing to use both results data and
compliance data in making the Department’s determinations in 2020 , as it did for Part C
determinations in 2015, 2016, 201 7 , 2018, and 201 9 . (The spec ifics of the determination
procedures and criteria are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your
State.) For 2020 , the Department’s IDEA Part C determinations continue to include consideration
of each State’s Child Outcomes data, whic h measure how children who receive Part C services
are improving functioning in three outcome areas that are critical to school readiness:
Page 2 — Lead Agency Director
• p ositive social - emotional skills;
• acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicati on); and
• use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs .
Specifically, the Department considered the data quality and the child performance levels in each
State’s Child Outcomes FFY 2018 data .
You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your State’ s SPP/APR and other relevant data
by accessing the EMAPS SPP/APR reporting tool using your State - specific log - on information at
https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find, in
Indicators 1 through 10, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is
required to take. The actions that the State is required to take are in two places:
(1) actions related to the correction of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP
Response” section of the indicator; and
(2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Actions” section of
the indicator.
It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include
language in the “OSEP Response” and/or “Required Actions” sections.
You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments:
(1) the State’s RDA Matrix;
(2) the HTDMD document;
(3) a spreadsheet entitled “ 2020 Data Rubric Part C,” which shows how OSEP calculated the
State’s “Timely and Accurate State - Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and
(4) a document entitled “Dispute Resolution 201 8 - 20 1 9 ,” which includes the IDEA section
6 18 data that OSEP used to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and
“Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix.
As noted above, the State’s 20 20 determination is Meets Requirements. A State’s 20 20 RDA
Determi nation is Meets Requirements if the RDA Percentage is at least 80%, unless the
Department has imposed Special or Specific Conditions on the State’s last three IDEA Part C
grant awards (for FFYs 201 7 , 201 8 , and 201 9 ), and those Speci fic Conditions are in ef fect at the
time of the 20 20 determination.
States were required to submit Phase III Year Four of the SSIP by April 1 , 20 20 . OSEP
appreciates the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve results for infants and
toddlers with disabilities and their families. We have carefully reviewed and responded to your
submission and will provide additional feedback in the upcoming weeks. Additionally, OSEP
will continue to work with your State as it implements the fifth year of Phase III of the SSIP,
which is due on April 1, 20 21 .
As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State lead
agency’s website, on the performance of each early intervention service ( EIS ) program located in
the State on the targets in the SPP/ APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days after
the State’s submission of its FFY 2018 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must:
Page 3 — Lead Agency Director
(1) review EIS program performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR;
(2) determine if each EIS program “meets the requirements” of Part C, or “needs assistance,”
“needs intervention,” or “needs substantial intervention” in implementing Part C of the
IDEA ;
(3) take appropriate enforcement action; and
(4) inform each EIS program of its determination.
Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the State lead
agency’s website. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that:
(1) includes the State’s determination letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments , and all State
attachments that are accessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973 ; and
(2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website .
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities
and their families and looks forward to working with your State over the n ext year as we
continue our important work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and their
families. Please contact your OSEP State Lead if you have any questions, would like to discuss
this further, or want to request technical assistance.
Sincerely,
Laurie VanderPloeg
Director
Office of Special Education Programs
cc: State Part C Coordinator
View File
2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Texas
State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent coFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.81%95.01%96.34%95.61%95.88%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage9,10710,48195.88%100%95.76%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attriThe data reflects all infants and toddlers with new early intervention services from IFSPs between March 1, 2019 and 353500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repoBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=98.50%99.00%99.00%99.00%99.00%Data99.36%99.50%99.58%99.29%99.26%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.00%99.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC,SourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs28Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=71.30%71.00%71.20%71.40%71.60%A171.31%Data71.31%71.77%71.90%72.30%72.28%A22013Target>=53.70%53.80%53.90%54.10%54.30%A253.67%Data53.67%53.76%52.88%52.40%48.71%B12013Target>=77.00%77.10%77.2%77.30%77.40%B177.35%Data77.35%77.69%77.94%78.55%78.42%B22013Target>=45.00%45.10%45.15%445.30%B245.00%Data45.00%44.33%42.40%42.23%39.27%C12013Target>=77.70%77.40%77.50%77.60%77.70%C177.65%Data77.65%78.11%79.85%80.43%80.35%C22013Target>=51.40%51.50%51.60%51.65%51.70%C251.39%Data51.39%51.27%51.21%49.88%47.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=71.80%71.72%Target A2>=54.40%53.69%Target B1>=77.50%78.22%Target B2>=45.40%45.02%Target C1>=77.80%79.52%Target C2>=51.80%51.41% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed20,998Outcome A: Positive social-emotional ska. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning760.36%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it5,57326.54%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,28634.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3,07314.63%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who 49.33%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning560.27%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it8,60340.97%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,21734.37%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers7643.64%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable ECI continues to focus its efforts on improving the quality of the data. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning720.34%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it6,97333.21%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers8,82842.04%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,1295.38%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP ResponseThe State revised its targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - Required ActionSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 87.00%87.00%87.00%87.00%A86.57%Data86.57%87.48%86.40%88.84%87.91%B2013Target>=87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%B87.71%Data87.71%88.22%87.41%90.18%88.75%C2013Target>=87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%C87.79%Data87.79%88.70%87.41%88.59%89.98TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=88.00%88.00%Target C>=88.00%88.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI Adv5,557Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,914A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable There was a 0.4% decrease in FFY 2018 data when compared to the FFY 2018 target. ECI's policy requires contractors tDescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. A stratified randIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required ActionsIndiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.85%0.99%0.99%0.99%0.99%Data0.99%0.99%0.94%1.05%1.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.99%1.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1390,665FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2015 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and 20051.93%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.98%1.98%1.99%2.00%2.01%Data2.03%2.05%2.04%2.11%2.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.01%2.02%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 31,197,592FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 201Texas exceeded its target of 2.01% for the percent of the birth-to-three population with IFSPs, and improved its perfIf the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.29%97.50%98.93%98.44%98.72%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessmentSlippage8,0058,85898.72%100%98.79%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to exceptionWe reviewed a total of 8,858 records of children entered in the TKIDS database. All were referred to ECI from March 1202000FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repodhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.89%97.18%97.39%95.24%96.37%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transition planninFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,8083,90496.37%100%98.54%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attribProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Total number of records reviewed for children exiting P262600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.73%95.07%92.94%91.25%94.32%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exitingFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,1243,80494.32%100%96.12%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of parents wWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data w323200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliIn compliance with OSEP Memo 09-02, ECI examines data from TKIDS at least one time per year to determine noncomplianc8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.80%95.80%90.69%91.65%92.30%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transition conferencFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0123,80492.30%100%93.60%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of toddlers for whom the paThe actual target data included all children who exited ECI and turned three years of age between March 1, 2019 and M31310FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to reNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not useSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutioStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)9 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNon9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data100.00%0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provide512-206-4567Submitted on: 04/24/20 12:56:18 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC xch.DocumePreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent coFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.81%95.01%96.34%95.61%95.88%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage9,10710,48195.88%100%95.76%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attriThe data reflects all infants and toddlers with new early intervention services from IFSPs between March 1, 2019 and 353500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repoBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=98.50%99.00%99.00%99.00%99.00%Data99.36%99.50%99.58%99.29%99.26%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.00%99.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC,SourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs28Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=71.30%71.00%71.20%71.40%71.60%A171.31%Data71.31%71.77%71.90%72.30%72.28%A22013Target>=53.70%53.80%53.90%54.10%54.30%A253.67%Data53.67%53.76%52.88%52.40%48.71%B12013Target>=77.00%77.10%77.2%77.30%77.40%B177.35%Data77.35%77.69%77.94%78.55%78.42%B22013Target>=45.00%45.10%45.15%445.30%B245.00%Data45.00%44.33%42.40%42.23%39.27%C12013Target>=77.70%77.40%77.50%77.60%77.70%C177.65%Data77.65%78.11%79.85%80.43%80.35%C22013Target>=51.40%51.50%51.60%51.65%51.70%C251.39%Data51.39%51.27%51.21%49.88%47.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=71.80%71.72%Target A2>=54.40%53.69%Target B1>=77.50%78.22%Target B2>=45.40%45.02%Target C1>=77.80%79.52%Target C2>=51.80%51.41% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed20,998Outcome A: Positive social-emotional ska. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning760.36%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it5,57326.54%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,28634.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3,07314.63%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who 49.33%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning560.27%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it8,60340.97%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,21734.37%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers7643.64%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable ECI continues to focus its efforts on improving the quality of the data. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning720.34%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it6,97333.21%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers8,82842.04%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,1295.38%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP ResponseThe State revised its targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - Required ActionSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 87.00%87.00%87.00%87.00%A86.57%Data86.57%87.48%86.40%88.84%87.91%B2013Target>=87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%B87.71%Data87.71%88.22%87.41%90.18%88.75%C2013Target>=87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%C87.79%Data87.79%88.70%87.41%88.59%89.98TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=88.00%88.00%Target C>=88.00%88.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI Adv5,557Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,914A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable There was a 0.4% decrease in FFY 2018 data when compared to the FFY 2018 target. ECI's policy requires contractors tDescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. A stratified randIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required ActionsIndiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.85%0.99%0.99%0.99%0.99%Data0.99%0.99%0.94%1.05%1.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.99%1.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1390,665FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2015 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and 20051.93%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.98%1.98%1.99%2.00%2.01%Data2.03%2.05%2.04%2.11%2.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.01%2.02%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 31,197,592FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 201Texas exceeded its target of 2.01% for the percent of the birth-to-three population with IFSPs, and improved its perfIf the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.29%97.50%98.93%98.44%98.72%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessmentSlippage8,0058,85898.72%100%98.79%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to exceptionWe reviewed a total of 8,858 records of children entered in the TKIDS database. All were referred to ECI from March 1202000FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repodhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.89%97.18%97.39%95.24%96.37%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transition planninFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,8083,90496.37%100%98.54%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attribProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Total number of records reviewed for children exiting P262600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.73%95.07%92.94%91.25%94.32%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exitingFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,1243,80494.32%100%96.12%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of parents wWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data w323200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliIn compliance with OSEP Memo 09-02, ECI examines data from TKIDS at least one time per year to determine noncomplianc8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.80%95.80%90.69%91.65%92.30%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transition conferencFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0123,80492.30%100%93.60%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of toddlers for whom the paThe actual target data included all children who exited ECI and turned three years of age between March 1, 2019 and M31310FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to reNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not useSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutioStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)9 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNon9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data100.00%0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provide512-206-4567Submitted on: 04/24/20 12:56:18 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC xch.DocumePreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent coFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.81%95.01%96.34%95.61%95.88%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage9,10710,48195.88%100%95.76%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attriThe data reflects all infants and toddlers with new early intervention services from IFSPs between March 1, 2019 and 353500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repoBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=98.50%99.00%99.00%99.00%99.00%Data99.36%99.50%99.58%99.29%99.26%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.00%99.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC,SourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs28Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=71.30%71.00%71.20%71.40%71.60%A171.31%Data71.31%71.77%71.90%72.30%72.28%A22013Target>=53.70%53.80%53.90%54.10%54.30%A253.67%Data53.67%53.76%52.88%52.40%48.71%B12013Target>=77.00%77.10%77.2%77.30%77.40%B177.35%Data77.35%77.69%77.94%78.55%78.42%B22013Target>=45.00%45.10%45.15%445.30%B245.00%Data45.00%44.33%42.40%42.23%39.27%C12013Target>=77.70%77.40%77.50%77.60%77.70%C177.65%Data77.65%78.11%79.85%80.43%80.35%C22013Target>=51.40%51.50%51.60%51.65%51.70%C251.39%Data51.39%51.27%51.21%49.88%47.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=71.80%71.72%Target A2>=54.40%53.69%Target B1>=77.50%78.22%Target B2>=45.40%45.02%Target C1>=77.80%79.52%Target C2>=51.80%51.41% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed20,998Outcome A: Positive social-emotional ska. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning760.36%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it5,57326.54%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,28634.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3,07314.63%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who 49.33%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning560.27%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it8,60340.97%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,21734.37%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers7643.64%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable ECI continues to focus its efforts on improving the quality of the data. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning720.34%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it6,97333.21%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers8,82842.04%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,1295.38%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP ResponseThe State revised its targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - Required ActionSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 87.00%87.00%87.00%87.00%A86.57%Data86.57%87.48%86.40%88.84%87.91%B2013Target>=87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%B87.71%Data87.71%88.22%87.41%90.18%88.75%C2013Target>=87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%C87.79%Data87.79%88.70%87.41%88.59%89.98TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=88.00%88.00%Target C>=88.00%88.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI Adv5,557Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,914A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable There was a 0.4% decrease in FFY 2018 data when compared to the FFY 2018 target. ECI's policy requires contractors tDescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. A stratified randIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required ActionsIndiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.85%0.99%0.99%0.99%0.99%Data0.99%0.99%0.94%1.05%1.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.99%1.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1390,665FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2015 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and 20051.93%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.98%1.98%1.99%2.00%2.01%Data2.03%2.05%2.04%2.11%2.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.01%2.02%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 31,197,592FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 201Texas exceeded its target of 2.01% for the percent of the birth-to-three population with IFSPs, and improved its perfIf the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.29%97.50%98.93%98.44%98.72%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessmentSlippage8,0058,85898.72%100%98.79%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to exceptionWe reviewed a total of 8,858 records of children entered in the TKIDS database. All were referred to ECI from March 1202000FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repodhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.89%97.18%97.39%95.24%96.37%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transition planninFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,8083,90496.37%100%98.54%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attribProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Total number of records reviewed for children exiting P262600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.73%95.07%92.94%91.25%94.32%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exitingFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,1243,80494.32%100%96.12%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of parents wWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data w323200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliIn compliance with OSEP Memo 09-02, ECI examines data from TKIDS at least one time per year to determine noncomplianc8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.80%95.80%90.69%91.65%92.30%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transition conferencFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0123,80492.30%100%93.60%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of toddlers for whom the paThe actual target data included all children who exited ECI and turned three years of age between March 1, 2019 and M31310FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to reNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not useSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutioStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)9 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNon9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data100.00%0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provide512-206-4567Submitted on: 04/24/20 12:56:18 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC xch.DocumePreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent coFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.81%95.01%96.34%95.61%95.88%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage9,10710,48195.88%100%95.76%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attriThe data reflects all infants and toddlers with new early intervention services from IFSPs between March 1, 2019 and 353500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repoBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=98.50%99.00%99.00%99.00%99.00%Data99.36%99.50%99.58%99.29%99.26%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.00%99.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC,SourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs28Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=71.30%71.00%71.20%71.40%71.60%A171.31%Data71.31%71.77%71.90%72.30%72.28%A22013Target>=53.70%53.80%53.90%54.10%54.30%A253.67%Data53.67%53.76%52.88%52.40%48.71%B12013Target>=77.00%77.10%77.2%77.30%77.40%B177.35%Data77.35%77.69%77.94%78.55%78.42%B22013Target>=45.00%45.10%45.15%445.30%B245.00%Data45.00%44.33%42.40%42.23%39.27%C12013Target>=77.70%77.40%77.50%77.60%77.70%C177.65%Data77.65%78.11%79.85%80.43%80.35%C22013Target>=51.40%51.50%51.60%51.65%51.70%C251.39%Data51.39%51.27%51.21%49.88%47.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=71.80%71.72%Target A2>=54.40%53.69%Target B1>=77.50%78.22%Target B2>=45.40%45.02%Target C1>=77.80%79.52%Target C2>=51.80%51.41% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed20,998Outcome A: Positive social-emotional ska. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning760.36%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it5,57326.54%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,28634.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3,07314.63%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who 49.33%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning560.27%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it8,60340.97%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,21734.37%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers7643.64%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable ECI continues to focus its efforts on improving the quality of the data. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning720.34%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it6,97333.21%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers8,82842.04%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,1295.38%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP ResponseThe State revised its targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - Required ActionSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 87.00%87.00%87.00%87.00%A86.57%Data86.57%87.48%86.40%88.84%87.91%B2013Target>=87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%B87.71%Data87.71%88.22%87.41%90.18%88.75%C2013Target>=87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%C87.79%Data87.79%88.70%87.41%88.59%89.98TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=88.00%88.00%Target C>=88.00%88.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI Adv5,557Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,914A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable There was a 0.4% decrease in FFY 2018 data when compared to the FFY 2018 target. ECI's policy requires contractors tDescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. A stratified randIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required ActionsIndiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.85%0.99%0.99%0.99%0.99%Data0.99%0.99%0.94%1.05%1.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.99%1.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1390,665FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2015 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and 20051.93%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.98%1.98%1.99%2.00%2.01%Data2.03%2.05%2.04%2.11%2.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.01%2.02%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 31,197,592FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 201Texas exceeded its target of 2.01% for the percent of the birth-to-three population with IFSPs, and improved its perfIf the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.29%97.50%98.93%98.44%98.72%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessmentSlippage8,0058,85898.72%100%98.79%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to exceptionWe reviewed a total of 8,858 records of children entered in the TKIDS database. All were referred to ECI from March 1202000FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repodhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.89%97.18%97.39%95.24%96.37%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transition planninFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,8083,90496.37%100%98.54%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attribProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Total number of records reviewed for children exiting P262600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.73%95.07%92.94%91.25%94.32%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exitingFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,1243,80494.32%100%96.12%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of parents wWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data w323200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliIn compliance with OSEP Memo 09-02, ECI examines data from TKIDS at least one time per year to determine noncomplianc8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.80%95.80%90.69%91.65%92.30%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transition conferencFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0123,80492.30%100%93.60%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of toddlers for whom the paThe actual target data included all children who exited ECI and turned three years of age between March 1, 2019 and M31310FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to reNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not useSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutioStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)9 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNon9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data100.00%0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provide512-206-4567Submitted on: 04/24/20 12:56:18 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC xch.DocumePreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent coFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.81%95.01%96.34%95.61%95.88%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage9,10710,48195.88%100%95.76%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attriThe data reflects all infants and toddlers with new early intervention services from IFSPs between March 1, 2019 and 353500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repoBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=98.50%99.00%99.00%99.00%99.00%Data99.36%99.50%99.58%99.29%99.26%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.00%99.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC,SourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs28Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=71.30%71.00%71.20%71.40%71.60%A171.31%Data71.31%71.77%71.90%72.30%72.28%A22013Target>=53.70%53.80%53.90%54.10%54.30%A253.67%Data53.67%53.76%52.88%52.40%48.71%B12013Target>=77.00%77.10%77.2%77.30%77.40%B177.35%Data77.35%77.69%77.94%78.55%78.42%B22013Target>=45.00%45.10%45.15%445.30%B245.00%Data45.00%44.33%42.40%42.23%39.27%C12013Target>=77.70%77.40%77.50%77.60%77.70%C177.65%Data77.65%78.11%79.85%80.43%80.35%C22013Target>=51.40%51.50%51.60%51.65%51.70%C251.39%Data51.39%51.27%51.21%49.88%47.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=71.80%71.72%Target A2>=54.40%53.69%Target B1>=77.50%78.22%Target B2>=45.40%45.02%Target C1>=77.80%79.52%Target C2>=51.80%51.41% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed20,998Outcome A: Positive social-emotional ska. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning760.36%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it5,57326.54%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,28634.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3,07314.63%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who 49.33%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning560.27%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it8,60340.97%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,21734.37%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers7643.64%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable ECI continues to focus its efforts on improving the quality of the data. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning720.34%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it6,97333.21%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers8,82842.04%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,1295.38%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP ResponseThe State revised its targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - Required ActionSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 87.00%87.00%87.00%87.00%A86.57%Data86.57%87.48%86.40%88.84%87.91%B2013Target>=87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%B87.71%Data87.71%88.22%87.41%90.18%88.75%C2013Target>=87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%C87.79%Data87.79%88.70%87.41%88.59%89.98TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=88.00%88.00%Target C>=88.00%88.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI Adv5,557Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,914A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable There was a 0.4% decrease in FFY 2018 data when compared to the FFY 2018 target. ECI's policy requires contractors tDescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. A stratified randIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required ActionsIndiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.85%0.99%0.99%0.99%0.99%Data0.99%0.99%0.94%1.05%1.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.99%1.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1390,665FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2015 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and 20051.93%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.98%1.98%1.99%2.00%2.01%Data2.03%2.05%2.04%2.11%2.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.01%2.02%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 31,197,592FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 201Texas exceeded its target of 2.01% for the percent of the birth-to-three population with IFSPs, and improved its perfIf the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.29%97.50%98.93%98.44%98.72%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessmentSlippage8,0058,85898.72%100%98.79%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to exceptionWe reviewed a total of 8,858 records of children entered in the TKIDS database. All were referred to ECI from March 1202000FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repodhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.89%97.18%97.39%95.24%96.37%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transition planninFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,8083,90496.37%100%98.54%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attribProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Total number of records reviewed for children exiting P262600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.73%95.07%92.94%91.25%94.32%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exitingFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,1243,80494.32%100%96.12%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of parents wWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data w323200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliIn compliance with OSEP Memo 09-02, ECI examines data from TKIDS at least one time per year to determine noncomplianc8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.80%95.80%90.69%91.65%92.30%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transition conferencFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0123,80492.30%100%93.60%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of toddlers for whom the paThe actual target data included all children who exited ECI and turned three years of age between March 1, 2019 and M31310FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to reNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not useSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutioStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)9 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNon9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data100.00%0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provide512-206-4567Submitted on: 04/24/20 12:56:18 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC xch.DocumePreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent coFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.81%95.01%96.34%95.61%95.88%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage9,10710,48195.88%100%95.76%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attriThe data reflects all infants and toddlers with new early intervention services from IFSPs between March 1, 2019 and 353500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repoBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=98.50%99.00%99.00%99.00%99.00%Data99.36%99.50%99.58%99.29%99.26%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.00%99.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC,SourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs28Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12013Target>=71.30%71.00%71.20%71.40%71.60%A171.31%Data71.31%71.77%71.90%72.30%72.28%A22013Target>=53.70%53.80%53.90%54.10%54.30%A253.67%Data53.67%53.76%52.88%52.40%48.71%B12013Target>=77.00%77.10%77.2%77.30%77.40%B177.35%Data77.35%77.69%77.94%78.55%78.42%B22013Target>=45.00%45.10%45.15%445.30%B245.00%Data45.00%44.33%42.40%42.23%39.27%C12013Target>=77.70%77.40%77.50%77.60%77.70%C177.65%Data77.65%78.11%79.85%80.43%80.35%C22013Target>=51.40%51.50%51.60%51.65%51.70%C251.39%Data51.39%51.27%51.21%49.88%47.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=71.80%71.72%Target A2>=54.40%53.69%Target B1>=77.50%78.22%Target B2>=45.40%45.02%Target C1>=77.80%79.52%Target C2>=51.80%51.41% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed20,998Outcome A: Positive social-emotional ska. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning760.36%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it5,57326.54%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,28634.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3,07314.63%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who 49.33%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning560.27%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it8,60340.97%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7,21734.37%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers7643.64%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable ECI continues to focus its efforts on improving the quality of the data. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning720.34%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it6,97333.21%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers8,82842.04%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,1295.38%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP ResponseThe State revised its targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - Required ActionSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 87.00%87.00%87.00%87.00%A86.57%Data86.57%87.48%86.40%88.84%87.91%B2013Target>=87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%87.70%B87.71%Data87.71%88.22%87.41%90.18%88.75%C2013Target>=87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%87.80%C87.79%Data87.79%88.70%87.41%88.59%89.98TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=88.00%88.00%Target C>=88.00%88.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI Adv5,557Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,914A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable There was a 0.4% decrease in FFY 2018 data when compared to the FFY 2018 target. ECI's policy requires contractors tDescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. A stratified randIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required ActionsIndiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.85%0.99%0.99%0.99%0.99%Data0.99%0.99%0.94%1.05%1.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.99%1.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1390,665FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2015 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone5 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and 20051.93%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.98%1.98%1.99%2.00%2.01%Data2.03%2.05%2.04%2.11%2.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.01%2.02%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input ECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdvDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IF06/20/2019Population of infants and toddlers birth to 31,197,592FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 201Texas exceeded its target of 2.01% for the percent of the birth-to-three population with IFSPs, and improved its perfIf the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.29%97.50%98.93%98.44%98.72%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessmentSlippage8,0058,85898.72%100%98.79%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to exceptionWe reviewed a total of 8,858 records of children entered in the TKIDS database. All were referred to ECI from March 1202000FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repodhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.89%97.18%97.39%95.24%96.37%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transition planninFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,8083,90496.37%100%98.54%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attribProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Total number of records reviewed for children exiting P262600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.73%95.07%92.94%91.25%94.32%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exitingFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,1243,80494.32%100%96.12%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of parents wWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data w323200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliIn compliance with OSEP Memo 09-02, ECI examines data from TKIDS at least one time per year to determine noncomplianc8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StaDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.80%95.80%90.69%91.65%92.30%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transition conferencFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0123,80492.30%100%93.60%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of toddlers for whom the paThe actual target data included all children who exited ECI and turned three years of age between March 1, 2019 and M31310FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedIn accordance with OSEP Memo 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to reNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not useSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutioStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)9 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNon9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputECI develops the Texas Part C APR with direction from the SICC, the ECI AdviBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data100.00%0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provide512-206-4567Submitted on: 04/24/20 12:56:18 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC xch.DocumePreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 13
(Grant Year 2018–2019 — Issued June 23, 2020)
How the department made determinations
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-80857 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on September 15, 2020