2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — North Dakota
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
PDF2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — North Dakota
MS WORDView PDF
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600
www.ed.gov
The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by
fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION
O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES
June 23, 20 20
Honorable Christopher Jones
Executive Director
Department of Human Services
State Capitol, Judicial Wing, 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Department 325
Bismarck , North Dakota 58505
Dear Executive Director Jones :
I am writing to advise you of the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) 2020
determination under sections 616 and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA). The Department has determined that North Dakota meets the requirements and purposes
of Part C of the IDEA. This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data and
information, including the Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 State Performance Plan/Annual
Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State - reported data, and other publicly available
information.
Your State’s 2020 determination is based on the data reflected in the State’s “ 2020 Part C
Results - Driven Accountability Matrix” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for
each State and consists of:
(1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other
compliance factors;
(2) Results Components and Appendices that include scoring on Results Elements;
(3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score;
(4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Compliance Score and the Results Score; and
(5) the Stat e’s Determination.
The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made
Determinations under Sections 616(d) and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
in 2020 : Part C” (HTDMD).
The Office of Special Educati on Programs (OSEP) is continuing to use both results data and
compliance data in making the Department’s determinations in 2020 , as it did for Part C
determinations in 2015, 2016, 201 7 , 2018, and 201 9 . (The specifics of the determination
procedures and cri teria are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your
State.) For 2020 , the Department’s IDEA Part C determinations continue to include consideration
of each State’s Child Outcomes data, which measure how children who receive Part C ser vices
are improving functioning in three outcome areas that are critical to school readiness:
Page 2 — Lead Agency Director
• p ositive social - emotional skills;
• acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); and
• use of appropriate behaviors to mee t their needs .
Specifically, the Department considered the data quality and the child performance levels in each
State’s Child Outcomes FFY 2018 data .
You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your State’s SPP/APR and other relevant data
by accessin g the EMAPS SPP/APR reporting tool using your State - specific log - on information at
https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find, in
Indicators 1 through 10, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is
required to take. The actions that the State is required to take are in two places:
(1) actions related to the correction of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP
Response” section of the indicator; and
(2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Actions” section of
the indicator.
It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include
language in the “OSEP Response” and/or “Required Actions” sections.
You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments:
(1) the State’s RDA Matrix;
(2) the HTDMD document;
(3) a spreadsheet entitled “ 2020 Data Rubric Part C,” which shows how OSEP calculated the
State’s “Timely and Accurate State - Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and
(4) a document entitled “Dispute Resolution 201 8 - 20 1 9 ,” which includes the IDEA section
6 18 data that OSEP used to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and
“Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix.
As noted above, the State’s 20 20 determination is Meets Requirements. A State’s 20 20 RDA
Determi nation is Meets Requirements if the RDA Percentage is at least 80%, unless the
Department has imposed Special or Specific Conditions on the State’s last three IDEA Part C
grant awards (for FFYs 201 7 , 201 8 , and 201 9 ), and those Speci fic Conditions are in ef fect at the
time of the 20 20 determination.
States were required to submit Phase III Year Four of the SSIP by April 1 , 20 20 . OSEP
appreciates the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve results for infants and
toddlers with disabilities and their families. We have carefully reviewed and responded to your
submission and will provide additional feedback in the upcoming weeks. Additionally, OSEP
will continue to work with your State as it implements the fifth year of Phase III of the SSIP,
which is due on April 1, 20 21 .
As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State lead
agency’s website, on the performance of each early intervention service ( EIS ) program located in
the State on the targets in the SPP/ APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days after
the State’s submission of its FFY 2018 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must:
Page 3 — Lead Agency Director
(1) review EIS program performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR;
(2) determine if each EIS program “meets the requirements” of Part C, or “needs assistance,”
“needs intervention,” or “needs substantial intervention” in implementing Part C of the
IDEA ;
(3) take appropriate enforcement action; and
(4) inform each EIS program of its determination.
Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the State lead
agency’s website. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that:
(1) includes the State’s determination letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments , and all State
attachments that are accessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973 ; and
(2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website .
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities
and their families and looks forward to working with your State over the next year as we
continue our important work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and their
families. Please contact your OSEP State Lead if you have any questions, would like to discuss
this further, or want to request technical assistance.
Sincerely,
Laurie VanderPloeg
Director
Office of Special Education Programs
cc: State Part C Coordinator
View File
2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — North Dakota
State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabilInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StatIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in the Office of Special Education ProFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.52%97.70%98.92%97.43%96.70%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on theFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,19696.70%100%98.24%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributabData for Indicator 1 is taken from North Dakota's state electronic record system, Therap. North Dakota obtained a full ye37370FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the2 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200598.26%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%Data99.71%99.83%100.00%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.70%99.80%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for DateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or comm07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,521FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-base2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Intervend. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infanBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12008Target>=37.70%37.80%37.90%38.00%39.10%A133.30%Data38.05%44.33%72.46%72.04%72.14%A22008Target>=44.70%44.80%44.90%45.00%45.10%A260.30%Data45.07%42.77%41.71%43.42%37.50%B12008Target>=61.10%61.20%61.30%61.40%61.50%B147.50%Data59.06%59.08%69.03%66.67%67.09%B22008Target>=46.20%46.30%46.40%46.50%46.B252.00%Data44.18%38.48%36.51%36.96%33.23%C12008Target>=67.40%67.50%67.60%67.70%67.80%C164.80%Data63.41%64.95%78.18%78.30%77.95%C22008Target>=67.90%68.00%68.10%68.20%68.30%C280.90%Data64.78%59.18%57.80%57.78%55.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=39.20%60.50%Target A2>=60.40%60.50%Target B1>=62.50%62.60%Target B2>=52.10%52.20%Target C1>=68.80%68.90%Target C2>=81.00%81.10% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed278Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (ia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning62.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it3813.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers9835.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers8932.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who subs67.27%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicationa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning41.44%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it4516.19%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers11441.01%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3010.79%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B, tOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning51.80%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it2810.07%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7727.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers12745.68%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C, tNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months before eDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the crNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - RequC. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped t2006Target>=87.40%87.50%87.6%87.70%87.80%A88.12%Data99.00%99.51%97.67%98.77%98.08%B2006Target>=93.00%93.10%93.20%93.30%9B88.46%Data99.33%99.76%98.00%100.00%98.63%C2006Target>=91.60%91.70%91.80%91.90%92.00%C85.79%Data98.67%99.51%96.66%99.38%98.36%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=88.20%90.00%Target B>=94.00%94.10%Target C>=92.60%92.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previou1,623Number of respondent families participating in Part C 645A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rights64B1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively communiC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrenFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know thB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effectiC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help thWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families enrIf not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representative 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.10%Data1.86%1.76%1.93%2.29%2.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.20%2.24%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs2Population of infants and toddlers birth to 110,802FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage25410,8022.31%2.20%2.5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - Required FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%Data3.50%3.66%3.75%3.73%4.17%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.46%3.48%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPs1Population of infants and toddlers birth to 332,926FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,52132,9264.17%3.46%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 - RequiBaseline200539.39%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.63%98.04%98.76%98.00%97.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0861,22797.84%100%98.94%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infants and toddlers with IFSPs for the full reporting period. Data for24240FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, thedhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision PIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent didFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.22%99.33%100.00%100.0%95.92%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transitiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiesProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)4/27/20: For FFY 2018, North Dakota had 3 instances of nonc660FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe state assured correction of e8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the staDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data0.00%22.46%68.60%93.41%88.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priorDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is th4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceThe state issued letters of findings to three programs on 5.22.19. ee programs corrected their noncompliance and8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State's FFY 2018 reported data for this indicator is 85% based on the numbers entered into the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data95.80%96.38%97.32%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitionNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at theDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. A data set for Indicator 8C is taken from North Dakota's 000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the status Select yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable below. North DakotaStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of mediations is less than 10. In a reporting periSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; 11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previousFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Targemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC ficationInstructionsChoose the approproExch.Document.DC ument.DC MBED AcroExch.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabilInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StatIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in the Office of Special Education ProFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.52%97.70%98.92%97.43%96.70%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on theFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,19696.70%100%98.24%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributabData for Indicator 1 is taken from North Dakota's state electronic record system, Therap. North Dakota obtained a full ye37370FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the2 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200598.26%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%Data99.71%99.83%100.00%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.70%99.80%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for DateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or comm07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,521FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-base2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Intervend. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infanBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12008Target>=37.70%37.80%37.90%38.00%39.10%A133.30%Data38.05%44.33%72.46%72.04%72.14%A22008Target>=44.70%44.80%44.90%45.00%45.10%A260.30%Data45.07%42.77%41.71%43.42%37.50%B12008Target>=61.10%61.20%61.30%61.40%61.50%B147.50%Data59.06%59.08%69.03%66.67%67.09%B22008Target>=46.20%46.30%46.40%46.50%46.B252.00%Data44.18%38.48%36.51%36.96%33.23%C12008Target>=67.40%67.50%67.60%67.70%67.80%C164.80%Data63.41%64.95%78.18%78.30%77.95%C22008Target>=67.90%68.00%68.10%68.20%68.30%C280.90%Data64.78%59.18%57.80%57.78%55.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=39.20%60.50%Target A2>=60.40%60.50%Target B1>=62.50%62.60%Target B2>=52.10%52.20%Target C1>=68.80%68.90%Target C2>=81.00%81.10% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed278Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (ia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning62.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it3813.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers9835.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers8932.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who subs67.27%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicationa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning41.44%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it4516.19%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers11441.01%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3010.79%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B, tOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning51.80%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it2810.07%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7727.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers12745.68%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C, tNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months before eDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the crNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - RequC. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped t2006Target>=87.40%87.50%87.6%87.70%87.80%A88.12%Data99.00%99.51%97.67%98.77%98.08%B2006Target>=93.00%93.10%93.20%93.30%9B88.46%Data99.33%99.76%98.00%100.00%98.63%C2006Target>=91.60%91.70%91.80%91.90%92.00%C85.79%Data98.67%99.51%96.66%99.38%98.36%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=88.20%90.00%Target B>=94.00%94.10%Target C>=92.60%92.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previou1,623Number of respondent families participating in Part C 645A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rights64B1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively communiC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrenFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know thB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effectiC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help thWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families enrIf not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representative 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.10%Data1.86%1.76%1.93%2.29%2.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.20%2.24%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs2Population of infants and toddlers birth to 110,802FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage25410,8022.31%2.20%2.5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - Required FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%Data3.50%3.66%3.75%3.73%4.17%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.46%3.48%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPs1Population of infants and toddlers birth to 332,926FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,52132,9264.17%3.46%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 - RequiBaseline200539.39%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.63%98.04%98.76%98.00%97.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0861,22797.84%100%98.94%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infants and toddlers with IFSPs for the full reporting period. Data for24240FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, thedhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision PIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent didFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.22%99.33%100.00%100.0%95.92%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transitiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiesProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)4/27/20: For FFY 2018, North Dakota had 3 instances of nonc660FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe state assured correction of e8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the staDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data0.00%22.46%68.60%93.41%88.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priorDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is th4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceThe state issued letters of findings to three programs on 5.22.19. ee programs corrected their noncompliance and8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State's FFY 2018 reported data for this indicator is 85% based on the numbers entered into the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data95.80%96.38%97.32%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitionNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at theDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. A data set for Indicator 8C is taken from North Dakota's 000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the status Select yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable below. North DakotaStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of mediations is less than 10. In a reporting periSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; 11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previousFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Targemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC ficationInstructionsChoose the approproExch.Document.DC ument.DC MBED AcroExch.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabilInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StatIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in the Office of Special Education ProFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.52%97.70%98.92%97.43%96.70%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on theFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,19696.70%100%98.24%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributabData for Indicator 1 is taken from North Dakota's state electronic record system, Therap. North Dakota obtained a full ye37370FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the2 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200598.26%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%Data99.71%99.83%100.00%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.70%99.80%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for DateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or comm07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,521FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-base2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Intervend. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infanBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12008Target>=37.70%37.80%37.90%38.00%39.10%A133.30%Data38.05%44.33%72.46%72.04%72.14%A22008Target>=44.70%44.80%44.90%45.00%45.10%A260.30%Data45.07%42.77%41.71%43.42%37.50%B12008Target>=61.10%61.20%61.30%61.40%61.50%B147.50%Data59.06%59.08%69.03%66.67%67.09%B22008Target>=46.20%46.30%46.40%46.50%46.B252.00%Data44.18%38.48%36.51%36.96%33.23%C12008Target>=67.40%67.50%67.60%67.70%67.80%C164.80%Data63.41%64.95%78.18%78.30%77.95%C22008Target>=67.90%68.00%68.10%68.20%68.30%C280.90%Data64.78%59.18%57.80%57.78%55.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=39.20%60.50%Target A2>=60.40%60.50%Target B1>=62.50%62.60%Target B2>=52.10%52.20%Target C1>=68.80%68.90%Target C2>=81.00%81.10% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed278Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (ia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning62.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it3813.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers9835.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers8932.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who subs67.27%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicationa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning41.44%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it4516.19%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers11441.01%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3010.79%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B, tOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning51.80%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it2810.07%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7727.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers12745.68%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C, tNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months before eDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the crNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - RequC. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped t2006Target>=87.40%87.50%87.6%87.70%87.80%A88.12%Data99.00%99.51%97.67%98.77%98.08%B2006Target>=93.00%93.10%93.20%93.30%9B88.46%Data99.33%99.76%98.00%100.00%98.63%C2006Target>=91.60%91.70%91.80%91.90%92.00%C85.79%Data98.67%99.51%96.66%99.38%98.36%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=88.20%90.00%Target B>=94.00%94.10%Target C>=92.60%92.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previou1,623Number of respondent families participating in Part C 645A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rights64B1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively communiC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrenFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know thB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effectiC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help thWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families enrIf not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representative 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.10%Data1.86%1.76%1.93%2.29%2.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.20%2.24%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs2Population of infants and toddlers birth to 110,802FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage25410,8022.31%2.20%2.5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - Required FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%Data3.50%3.66%3.75%3.73%4.17%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.46%3.48%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPs1Population of infants and toddlers birth to 332,926FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,52132,9264.17%3.46%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 - RequiBaseline200539.39%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.63%98.04%98.76%98.00%97.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0861,22797.84%100%98.94%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infants and toddlers with IFSPs for the full reporting period. Data for24240FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, thedhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision PIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent didFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.22%99.33%100.00%100.0%95.92%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transitiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiesProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)4/27/20: For FFY 2018, North Dakota had 3 instances of nonc660FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe state assured correction of e8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the staDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data0.00%22.46%68.60%93.41%88.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priorDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is th4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceThe state issued letters of findings to three programs on 5.22.19. ee programs corrected their noncompliance and8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State's FFY 2018 reported data for this indicator is 85% based on the numbers entered into the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data95.80%96.38%97.32%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitionNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at theDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. A data set for Indicator 8C is taken from North Dakota's 000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the status Select yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable below. North DakotaStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of mediations is less than 10. In a reporting periSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; 11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previousFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Targemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC ficationInstructionsChoose the approproExch.Document.DC ument.DC MBED AcroExch.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabilInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StatIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in the Office of Special Education ProFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.52%97.70%98.92%97.43%96.70%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on theFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,19696.70%100%98.24%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributabData for Indicator 1 is taken from North Dakota's state electronic record system, Therap. North Dakota obtained a full ye37370FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the2 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200598.26%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%Data99.71%99.83%100.00%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.70%99.80%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for DateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or comm07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,521FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-base2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Intervend. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infanBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12008Target>=37.70%37.80%37.90%38.00%39.10%A133.30%Data38.05%44.33%72.46%72.04%72.14%A22008Target>=44.70%44.80%44.90%45.00%45.10%A260.30%Data45.07%42.77%41.71%43.42%37.50%B12008Target>=61.10%61.20%61.30%61.40%61.50%B147.50%Data59.06%59.08%69.03%66.67%67.09%B22008Target>=46.20%46.30%46.40%46.50%46.B252.00%Data44.18%38.48%36.51%36.96%33.23%C12008Target>=67.40%67.50%67.60%67.70%67.80%C164.80%Data63.41%64.95%78.18%78.30%77.95%C22008Target>=67.90%68.00%68.10%68.20%68.30%C280.90%Data64.78%59.18%57.80%57.78%55.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=39.20%60.50%Target A2>=60.40%60.50%Target B1>=62.50%62.60%Target B2>=52.10%52.20%Target C1>=68.80%68.90%Target C2>=81.00%81.10% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed278Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (ia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning62.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it3813.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers9835.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers8932.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who subs67.27%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicationa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning41.44%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it4516.19%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers11441.01%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3010.79%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B, tOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning51.80%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it2810.07%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7727.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers12745.68%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C, tNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months before eDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the crNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - RequC. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped t2006Target>=87.40%87.50%87.6%87.70%87.80%A88.12%Data99.00%99.51%97.67%98.77%98.08%B2006Target>=93.00%93.10%93.20%93.30%9B88.46%Data99.33%99.76%98.00%100.00%98.63%C2006Target>=91.60%91.70%91.80%91.90%92.00%C85.79%Data98.67%99.51%96.66%99.38%98.36%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=88.20%90.00%Target B>=94.00%94.10%Target C>=92.60%92.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previou1,623Number of respondent families participating in Part C 645A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rights64B1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively communiC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrenFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know thB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effectiC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help thWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families enrIf not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representative 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.10%Data1.86%1.76%1.93%2.29%2.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.20%2.24%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs2Population of infants and toddlers birth to 110,802FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage25410,8022.31%2.20%2.5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - Required FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%Data3.50%3.66%3.75%3.73%4.17%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.46%3.48%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPs1Population of infants and toddlers birth to 332,926FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,52132,9264.17%3.46%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 - RequiBaseline200539.39%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.63%98.04%98.76%98.00%97.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0861,22797.84%100%98.94%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infants and toddlers with IFSPs for the full reporting period. Data for24240FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, thedhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision PIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent didFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.22%99.33%100.00%100.0%95.92%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transitiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiesProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)4/27/20: For FFY 2018, North Dakota had 3 instances of nonc660FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe state assured correction of e8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the staDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data0.00%22.46%68.60%93.41%88.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priorDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is th4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceThe state issued letters of findings to three programs on 5.22.19. ee programs corrected their noncompliance and8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State's FFY 2018 reported data for this indicator is 85% based on the numbers entered into the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data95.80%96.38%97.32%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitionNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at theDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. A data set for Indicator 8C is taken from North Dakota's 000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the status Select yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable below. North DakotaStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of mediations is less than 10. In a reporting periSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; 11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previousFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Targemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC ficationInstructionsChoose the approproExch.Document.DC ument.DC MBED AcroExch.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabilInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StatIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in the Office of Special Education ProFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.52%97.70%98.92%97.43%96.70%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on theFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,19696.70%100%98.24%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributabData for Indicator 1 is taken from North Dakota's state electronic record system, Therap. North Dakota obtained a full ye37370FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the2 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200598.26%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%Data99.71%99.83%100.00%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.70%99.80%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for DateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or comm07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,521FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-base2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Intervend. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infanBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12008Target>=37.70%37.80%37.90%38.00%39.10%A133.30%Data38.05%44.33%72.46%72.04%72.14%A22008Target>=44.70%44.80%44.90%45.00%45.10%A260.30%Data45.07%42.77%41.71%43.42%37.50%B12008Target>=61.10%61.20%61.30%61.40%61.50%B147.50%Data59.06%59.08%69.03%66.67%67.09%B22008Target>=46.20%46.30%46.40%46.50%46.B252.00%Data44.18%38.48%36.51%36.96%33.23%C12008Target>=67.40%67.50%67.60%67.70%67.80%C164.80%Data63.41%64.95%78.18%78.30%77.95%C22008Target>=67.90%68.00%68.10%68.20%68.30%C280.90%Data64.78%59.18%57.80%57.78%55.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=39.20%60.50%Target A2>=60.40%60.50%Target B1>=62.50%62.60%Target B2>=52.10%52.20%Target C1>=68.80%68.90%Target C2>=81.00%81.10% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed278Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (ia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning62.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it3813.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers9835.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers8932.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who subs67.27%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicationa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning41.44%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it4516.19%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers11441.01%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3010.79%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B, tOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning51.80%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it2810.07%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7727.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers12745.68%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C, tNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months before eDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the crNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - RequC. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped t2006Target>=87.40%87.50%87.6%87.70%87.80%A88.12%Data99.00%99.51%97.67%98.77%98.08%B2006Target>=93.00%93.10%93.20%93.30%9B88.46%Data99.33%99.76%98.00%100.00%98.63%C2006Target>=91.60%91.70%91.80%91.90%92.00%C85.79%Data98.67%99.51%96.66%99.38%98.36%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=88.20%90.00%Target B>=94.00%94.10%Target C>=92.60%92.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previou1,623Number of respondent families participating in Part C 645A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rights64B1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively communiC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrenFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know thB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effectiC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help thWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families enrIf not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representative 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.10%Data1.86%1.76%1.93%2.29%2.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.20%2.24%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs2Population of infants and toddlers birth to 110,802FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage25410,8022.31%2.20%2.5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - Required FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%Data3.50%3.66%3.75%3.73%4.17%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.46%3.48%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPs1Population of infants and toddlers birth to 332,926FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,52132,9264.17%3.46%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 - RequiBaseline200539.39%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.63%98.04%98.76%98.00%97.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0861,22797.84%100%98.94%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infants and toddlers with IFSPs for the full reporting period. Data for24240FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, thedhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision PIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent didFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.22%99.33%100.00%100.0%95.92%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transitiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiesProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)4/27/20: For FFY 2018, North Dakota had 3 instances of nonc660FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe state assured correction of e8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the staDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data0.00%22.46%68.60%93.41%88.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priorDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is th4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceThe state issued letters of findings to three programs on 5.22.19. ee programs corrected their noncompliance and8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State's FFY 2018 reported data for this indicator is 85% based on the numbers entered into the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data95.80%96.38%97.32%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitionNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at theDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. A data set for Indicator 8C is taken from North Dakota's 000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the status Select yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable below. North DakotaStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of mediations is less than 10. In a reporting periSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; 11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previousFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Targemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC ficationInstructionsChoose the approproExch.Document.DC ument.DC MBED AcroExch.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabilInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StatIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in the Office of Special Education ProFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.52%97.70%98.92%97.43%96.70%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on theFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,19696.70%100%98.24%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributabData for Indicator 1 is taken from North Dakota's state electronic record system, Therap. North Dakota obtained a full ye37370FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the2 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200598.26%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%99.30%Data99.71%99.83%100.00%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=99.70%99.80%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for DateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or comm07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs1,521FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-base2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Intervend. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infanBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12008Target>=37.70%37.80%37.90%38.00%39.10%A133.30%Data38.05%44.33%72.46%72.04%72.14%A22008Target>=44.70%44.80%44.90%45.00%45.10%A260.30%Data45.07%42.77%41.71%43.42%37.50%B12008Target>=61.10%61.20%61.30%61.40%61.50%B147.50%Data59.06%59.08%69.03%66.67%67.09%B22008Target>=46.20%46.30%46.40%46.50%46.B252.00%Data44.18%38.48%36.51%36.96%33.23%C12008Target>=67.40%67.50%67.60%67.70%67.80%C164.80%Data63.41%64.95%78.18%78.30%77.95%C22008Target>=67.90%68.00%68.10%68.20%68.30%C280.90%Data64.78%59.18%57.80%57.78%55.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=39.20%60.50%Target A2>=60.40%60.50%Target B1>=62.50%62.60%Target B2>=52.10%52.20%Target C1>=68.80%68.90%Target C2>=81.00%81.10% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed278Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (ia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning62.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it3813.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers9835.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers8932.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who subs67.27%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicationa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning41.44%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agedc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it4516.19%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers11441.01%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers3010.79%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B, tOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning51.80%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it2810.07%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers7727.70%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers12745.68%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C, tNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months before eDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the crNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 3 - RequC. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped t2006Target>=87.40%87.50%87.6%87.70%87.80%A88.12%Data99.00%99.51%97.67%98.77%98.08%B2006Target>=93.00%93.10%93.20%93.30%9B88.46%Data99.33%99.76%98.00%100.00%98.63%C2006Target>=91.60%91.70%91.80%91.90%92.00%C85.79%Data98.67%99.51%96.66%99.38%98.36%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=88.20%90.00%Target B>=94.00%94.10%Target C>=92.60%92.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previou1,623Number of respondent families participating in Part C 645A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rights64B1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively communiC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the famC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrenFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know thB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effectiC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help thWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families enrIf not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representative 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.10%Data1.86%1.76%1.93%2.29%2.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.20%2.24%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs2Population of infants and toddlers birth to 110,802FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage25410,8022.31%2.20%2.5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - Required FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%3.43%Data3.50%3.66%3.75%3.73%4.17%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.46%3.48%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input On January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for tSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPs1Population of infants and toddlers birth to 332,926FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,52132,9264.17%3.46%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 - RequiBaseline200539.39%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data94.63%98.04%98.76%98.00%97.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assessFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0861,22797.84%100%98.94%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of Describe how the data accurately reflect data for infants and toddlers with IFSPs for the full reporting period. Data for24240FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, thedhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision PIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent didFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.22%99.33%100.00%100.0%95.92%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transitiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiesProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)4/27/20: For FFY 2018, North Dakota had 3 instances of nonc660FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe state assured correction of e8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the staDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data0.00%22.46%68.60%93.41%88.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priorDo you have a written opt-out policy? (yes/no)YESIf yes, is the policy on file with the Department? (yes/no)YESWhat is th4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianceThe state issued letters of findings to three programs on 5.22.19. ee programs corrected their noncompliance and8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State's FFY 2018 reported data for this indicator is 85% based on the numbers entered into the Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theseFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data95.80%96.38%97.32%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitionNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at theDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. A data set for Indicator 8C is taken from North Dakota's 000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 APRF8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the status Select yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable below. North DakotaStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of mediations is less than 10. In a reporting periSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; 11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputOn January 23, 2020 the ICC reviewed trend and performance data for the previousFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Targemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC ficationInstructionsChoose the approproExch.Document.DC ument.DC MBED AcroExch.Document.DC Explanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part C
(Grant Year 2018–2019 — Issued June 23, 2020)
How the department made determinations
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-80832 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on September 15, 2020