2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Nevada - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

OSEP Response to SPP/APR

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600 www.ed.gov The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES June 23, 20 20 Honorable Richard Whitley Di rector Nevada Department of Health and Human Services 4126 Technology Way Carson City , Nevada 89706 Dear Director Whitley : I am writing to advise you of the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) 2020 determination under sections 616 and 642 of the In dividuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Department has determined that Nevada needs assistance in meeting the requirements of Part C of the IDEA. This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data and information, including the F ederal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State - reported data, and other publicly available information. Your State’s 2020 determination is based on the data reflected in the State’s “ 2020 Part C Results - Driven Accountability Matrix” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for each State and consists of: (1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other compliance factors; (2) Results Components and Appendices that include scoring on Results Elements; (3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score; (4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Compli ance Score and the Results Score; and (5) the State’s Determination. The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made Determinations under Sections 616(d) and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 2020 : Part C” (HTDMD). The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is continuing to use both results data and compliance data in making the Department’s determinations in 2020 , as it did for the Part C determinations in 2015, 2016 , 2017 , 2018, and 2019 . (The specifics of the determination procedures and criteria are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your State.) For 2020 , the Department’s IDEA Part C determinations continue to include consideration Page 2 — Lead Agency Director of each State’s Child Outcomes data, which measure how children who receive Part C services are improving functioning in three outcome areas that are critical to school readiness: • p ositive social - emotional skills; • acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/commun ication); and • use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs . Specifically, the Department considered the data quality and the child performance levels in each State’s Child Outcomes FFY 2018 data . You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your S tate’s SPP/APR and other relevant data by accessing the EMAPS SPP/APR reporting tool using your State - specific log - on information at https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find, in Indicators 1 through 10, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is required to take. The actions that the State is required to take are in two places: (1) actions related to the cor rection of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP Response” section of the indicator; and (2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Actions” section of the indicator. It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include language in the “OSEP Response” and/or “Required Actions” sections. You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments: (1) the State’s RDA Matrix; (2) the HTDMD document; (3) a spreadsheet entitle d “ 2020 Data Rubric Part C,” which shows how OSEP calculated the State’s “Timely and Accurate State - Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and (4) a document entitled “Dispute Resolution 201 8 - 20 1 9 ,” which includes the IDEA section 618 data that OSEP us ed to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and “Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix. As noted above, the State’s 2020 determination is Needs Assistance. A State’s 2020 RDA Determination is Needs Assistance if the RDA Percentage is at least 60% but less than 80%. A State would also be Needs Assistance if its RDA Determination percentage is 80% or above, but the Department has imposed Special or Specific Conditions on the State’s last three IDEA Part C grant awards (for FFYs 201 7 , 201 8 , and 201 9 ), and those Specific Conditions are in effect at the time of the 20 20 determination. States were required to submit Phase III Year Four of the SSIP by April 1 , 20 20 . OSEP appreciat es the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. We have carefully reviewed and responded to your submission and will provide additional feedback in the upcoming weeks . Additionally, OSEP will continue to work with your State as it implements the fifth year of Phase III of the SSIP, which is due on April 1, 20 21 . Page 3 — Lead Agency Director As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State lead agency’s website , on the performance of each early intervention service ( EIS ) program located in the State on the targets in the SPP/APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days after the State’s submission of its FFY 2018 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must: (1) review EIS program performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR; (2) determine if each EIS program “meets the requirements” of Part C, or “needs assistance,” “needs intervention,” or “needs substantial intervention” in implementing Part C of the IDEA ; (3) take appropriate enforcement action; and (4) inform each EIS program of its determination. Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the State lead agency’s website. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that: (1) includes the State’s determination letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments , and all State attachments that are accessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ; and (2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website. OSEP appreciates t he State’s efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families and looks forward to working with your State over the next year as we continue our important work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and t heir families. Please contact your OSEP State Lead if you have any questions, would like to discuss this further, or want to request technical assistance. Sincerely, Laurie VanderPloeg Director Office of Special Education Programs cc: State Part C Coor dinator

View File

2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Nevada

State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SS1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200561.90%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.04%97.57%91.80%97.93%98.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage13315098.31%100%96.00%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablNevada's Definition of Timely Services:Early intervention services identified on the initial and subsequent Individua2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State did not provide the reasons for delay, as required by theBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%Data99.72%98.86%99.62%98.64%99.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputClarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders DescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-bTotal number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,265FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in thData for this indicator are generated using the Tracking Resources and Children (TRAC) child data collection system. Thaviors to meet their needs.Progress categories for A, B and C:a. Percent of infants and toddNOTargets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders werA165.25%Data65.25%63.32%70.42%70.91%65.87%A22013Target>=39.94%39.94%40.04%40.04%40.14%A239.94%Data39.94%37.56%41.85%44.48%42.86%B12013Target>=70.76%70.76%70.86%70.86%71.96%B170.76%Data70.76%68.67%76.00%79.17%76.30%B22013Target>=38.24%38.24%38.34%38.34%38.44%B238.24%Data38.24%36.61%37.49%40.43%39.59%C12013Target>=66.08%66.08%66.18%66.18%66.28%C166.08%Data66.08%61.11%73.55%77.51%74.12%C22013Target>=41.70%41.70%41.80%41.80%41.90%C241.70%Data41.70%37.44%46.68%49.63%47.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=67.90%67.90%Target A2>=40.14%40.14%Target B1>=71.96%71.96%Target B2>=38.44%38.44%Target C1>=66.28%66.28%Target C2>=41.90%41.90% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,279Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. In130.57%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable toc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it71431.33%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers61326.90%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers26411.58%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s38.48%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did na. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning150.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it91240.02%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers71231.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers863.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for Outcome B2a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning110.48%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it74832.82%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers77133.83%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1737.59%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CSlippageProvide reasons for C2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for OuThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the ildren in services for six (6) months or longer was not able to be reported due to the followiB. Effectively communicate their children's needs; andC. Help their children develop and learn.(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A2014201520162017A2006Target>=95.00%95.50%96.00%96.50%97.00%A94.29%Data95.83%97.20%94.37%98.05%97.16%B2006Target>=94.00%94.50%95.0%95.50%96.00%B91.32%Data96.44%93.48%93.86%94.81%96.02%C2006Target>=92.00%92.50%93.00%93.5C91.00%Data98.82%96.90%94.64%97.09%95.74%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=97.50%97.50%Target B>=96.50%96.50%Target C>=94.50%94.50%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/202 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders were provided an opportunity to comment on targ253A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped tA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part C slippage, if applicableMultiple factors affected the return rate of surveys. Although the Part C Office regularly reminds programs to ensure If yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this in5 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline20050.47%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.95%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%Data0.80%1.12%1.24%1.11%1.13%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.00%1.08%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSAnnual State Resident Population Estimates for 6 Race Groups (5 Race Alone Groups and Two or More Races) by Age, Sex, FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The ICC Child Find Subcommittee has recently begun utili20051.36%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%Data2.38%2.78%2.99%2.98%2.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.00%2.46%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3110,055FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,265110,0552.95%2The percent of the overall birth through age three general population receiving early intervention services in Nevada,If the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.83%99.83%99.38%99.88%99.76%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,2222,48699.76%100%NVRDid Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of The Part C Office audits the TRAC data collection system quarterly for this data. The annual monitoring uses the first3210FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianA second verification of the agency's data are conducted through a TRAC desk audit of child records for all programs 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator are valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.92%99.49%94.85%95.10%97.98%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The timeframe covered for the FFY 2018 monitoring covere110FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator is valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quart0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.08%98.87%98.74%97.94%98.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClarification added 4/28/2020,FFY 2016110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of resolution sessions is less than 10. In a reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage000.00%N/AN/AProvide addition9 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten resolution sessions held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to NOPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 20050.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TNone10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provLori Ann Malina-Lovell, DrPHTitle: Clinical Program Planner I / Part C CoordinatorEmail: lamalinalovell@dhhs.nv.govPhoPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SS1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200561.90%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.04%97.57%91.80%97.93%98.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage13315098.31%100%96.00%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablNevada's Definition of Timely Services:Early intervention services identified on the initial and subsequent Individua2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State did not provide the reasons for delay, as required by theBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%Data99.72%98.86%99.62%98.64%99.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputClarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders DescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-bTotal number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,265FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in thData for this indicator are generated using the Tracking Resources and Children (TRAC) child data collection system. Thaviors to meet their needs.Progress categories for A, B and C:a. Percent of infants and toddNOTargets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders werA165.25%Data65.25%63.32%70.42%70.91%65.87%A22013Target>=39.94%39.94%40.04%40.04%40.14%A239.94%Data39.94%37.56%41.85%44.48%42.86%B12013Target>=70.76%70.76%70.86%70.86%71.96%B170.76%Data70.76%68.67%76.00%79.17%76.30%B22013Target>=38.24%38.24%38.34%38.34%38.44%B238.24%Data38.24%36.61%37.49%40.43%39.59%C12013Target>=66.08%66.08%66.18%66.18%66.28%C166.08%Data66.08%61.11%73.55%77.51%74.12%C22013Target>=41.70%41.70%41.80%41.80%41.90%C241.70%Data41.70%37.44%46.68%49.63%47.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=67.90%67.90%Target A2>=40.14%40.14%Target B1>=71.96%71.96%Target B2>=38.44%38.44%Target C1>=66.28%66.28%Target C2>=41.90%41.90% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,279Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. In130.57%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable toc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it71431.33%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers61326.90%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers26411.58%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s38.48%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did na. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning150.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it91240.02%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers71231.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers863.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for Outcome B2a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning110.48%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it74832.82%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers77133.83%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1737.59%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CSlippageProvide reasons for C2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for OuThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the ildren in services for six (6) months or longer was not able to be reported due to the followiB. Effectively communicate their children's needs; andC. Help their children develop and learn.(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A2014201520162017A2006Target>=95.00%95.50%96.00%96.50%97.00%A94.29%Data95.83%97.20%94.37%98.05%97.16%B2006Target>=94.00%94.50%95.0%95.50%96.00%B91.32%Data96.44%93.48%93.86%94.81%96.02%C2006Target>=92.00%92.50%93.00%93.5C91.00%Data98.82%96.90%94.64%97.09%95.74%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=97.50%97.50%Target B>=96.50%96.50%Target C>=94.50%94.50%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/202 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders were provided an opportunity to comment on targ253A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped tA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part C slippage, if applicableMultiple factors affected the return rate of surveys. Although the Part C Office regularly reminds programs to ensure If yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this in5 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline20050.47%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.95%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%Data0.80%1.12%1.24%1.11%1.13%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.00%1.08%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSAnnual State Resident Population Estimates for 6 Race Groups (5 Race Alone Groups and Two or More Races) by Age, Sex, FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The ICC Child Find Subcommittee has recently begun utili20051.36%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%Data2.38%2.78%2.99%2.98%2.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.00%2.46%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3110,055FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,265110,0552.95%2The percent of the overall birth through age three general population receiving early intervention services in Nevada,If the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.83%99.83%99.38%99.88%99.76%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,2222,48699.76%100%NVRDid Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of The Part C Office audits the TRAC data collection system quarterly for this data. The annual monitoring uses the first3210FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianA second verification of the agency's data are conducted through a TRAC desk audit of child records for all programs 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator are valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.92%99.49%94.85%95.10%97.98%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The timeframe covered for the FFY 2018 monitoring covere110FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator is valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quart0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.08%98.87%98.74%97.94%98.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClarification added 4/28/2020,FFY 2016110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of resolution sessions is less than 10. In a reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage000.00%N/AN/AProvide addition9 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten resolution sessions held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to NOPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 20050.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TNone10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provLori Ann Malina-Lovell, DrPHTitle: Clinical Program Planner I / Part C CoordinatorEmail: lamalinalovell@dhhs.nv.govPhoPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SS1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200561.90%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.04%97.57%91.80%97.93%98.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage13315098.31%100%96.00%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablNevada's Definition of Timely Services:Early intervention services identified on the initial and subsequent Individua2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State did not provide the reasons for delay, as required by theBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%Data99.72%98.86%99.62%98.64%99.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputClarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders DescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-bTotal number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,265FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in thData for this indicator are generated using the Tracking Resources and Children (TRAC) child data collection system. Thaviors to meet their needs.Progress categories for A, B and C:a. Percent of infants and toddNOTargets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders werA165.25%Data65.25%63.32%70.42%70.91%65.87%A22013Target>=39.94%39.94%40.04%40.04%40.14%A239.94%Data39.94%37.56%41.85%44.48%42.86%B12013Target>=70.76%70.76%70.86%70.86%71.96%B170.76%Data70.76%68.67%76.00%79.17%76.30%B22013Target>=38.24%38.24%38.34%38.34%38.44%B238.24%Data38.24%36.61%37.49%40.43%39.59%C12013Target>=66.08%66.08%66.18%66.18%66.28%C166.08%Data66.08%61.11%73.55%77.51%74.12%C22013Target>=41.70%41.70%41.80%41.80%41.90%C241.70%Data41.70%37.44%46.68%49.63%47.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=67.90%67.90%Target A2>=40.14%40.14%Target B1>=71.96%71.96%Target B2>=38.44%38.44%Target C1>=66.28%66.28%Target C2>=41.90%41.90% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,279Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. In130.57%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable toc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it71431.33%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers61326.90%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers26411.58%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s38.48%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did na. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning150.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it91240.02%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers71231.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers863.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for Outcome B2a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning110.48%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it74832.82%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers77133.83%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1737.59%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CSlippageProvide reasons for C2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for OuThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the ildren in services for six (6) months or longer was not able to be reported due to the followiB. Effectively communicate their children's needs; andC. Help their children develop and learn.(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A2014201520162017A2006Target>=95.00%95.50%96.00%96.50%97.00%A94.29%Data95.83%97.20%94.37%98.05%97.16%B2006Target>=94.00%94.50%95.0%95.50%96.00%B91.32%Data96.44%93.48%93.86%94.81%96.02%C2006Target>=92.00%92.50%93.00%93.5C91.00%Data98.82%96.90%94.64%97.09%95.74%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=97.50%97.50%Target B>=96.50%96.50%Target C>=94.50%94.50%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/202 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders were provided an opportunity to comment on targ253A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped tA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part C slippage, if applicableMultiple factors affected the return rate of surveys. Although the Part C Office regularly reminds programs to ensure If yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this in5 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline20050.47%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.95%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%Data0.80%1.12%1.24%1.11%1.13%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.00%1.08%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSAnnual State Resident Population Estimates for 6 Race Groups (5 Race Alone Groups and Two or More Races) by Age, Sex, FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The ICC Child Find Subcommittee has recently begun utili20051.36%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%Data2.38%2.78%2.99%2.98%2.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.00%2.46%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3110,055FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,265110,0552.95%2The percent of the overall birth through age three general population receiving early intervention services in Nevada,If the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.83%99.83%99.38%99.88%99.76%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,2222,48699.76%100%NVRDid Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of The Part C Office audits the TRAC data collection system quarterly for this data. The annual monitoring uses the first3210FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianA second verification of the agency's data are conducted through a TRAC desk audit of child records for all programs 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator are valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.92%99.49%94.85%95.10%97.98%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The timeframe covered for the FFY 2018 monitoring covere110FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator is valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quart0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.08%98.87%98.74%97.94%98.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClarification added 4/28/2020,FFY 2016110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of resolution sessions is less than 10. In a reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage000.00%N/AN/AProvide addition9 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten resolution sessions held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to NOPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 20050.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TNone10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provLori Ann Malina-Lovell, DrPHTitle: Clinical Program Planner I / Part C CoordinatorEmail: lamalinalovell@dhhs.nv.govPhoPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SS1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200561.90%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.04%97.57%91.80%97.93%98.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage13315098.31%100%96.00%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablNevada's Definition of Timely Services:Early intervention services identified on the initial and subsequent Individua2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State did not provide the reasons for delay, as required by theBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%Data99.72%98.86%99.62%98.64%99.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputClarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders DescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-bTotal number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,265FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in thData for this indicator are generated using the Tracking Resources and Children (TRAC) child data collection system. Thaviors to meet their needs.Progress categories for A, B and C:a. Percent of infants and toddNOTargets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders werA165.25%Data65.25%63.32%70.42%70.91%65.87%A22013Target>=39.94%39.94%40.04%40.04%40.14%A239.94%Data39.94%37.56%41.85%44.48%42.86%B12013Target>=70.76%70.76%70.86%70.86%71.96%B170.76%Data70.76%68.67%76.00%79.17%76.30%B22013Target>=38.24%38.24%38.34%38.34%38.44%B238.24%Data38.24%36.61%37.49%40.43%39.59%C12013Target>=66.08%66.08%66.18%66.18%66.28%C166.08%Data66.08%61.11%73.55%77.51%74.12%C22013Target>=41.70%41.70%41.80%41.80%41.90%C241.70%Data41.70%37.44%46.68%49.63%47.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=67.90%67.90%Target A2>=40.14%40.14%Target B1>=71.96%71.96%Target B2>=38.44%38.44%Target C1>=66.28%66.28%Target C2>=41.90%41.90% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,279Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. In130.57%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable toc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it71431.33%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers61326.90%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers26411.58%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s38.48%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did na. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning150.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it91240.02%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers71231.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers863.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for Outcome B2a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning110.48%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it74832.82%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers77133.83%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1737.59%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CSlippageProvide reasons for C2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for OuThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the ildren in services for six (6) months or longer was not able to be reported due to the followiB. Effectively communicate their children's needs; andC. Help their children develop and learn.(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A2014201520162017A2006Target>=95.00%95.50%96.00%96.50%97.00%A94.29%Data95.83%97.20%94.37%98.05%97.16%B2006Target>=94.00%94.50%95.0%95.50%96.00%B91.32%Data96.44%93.48%93.86%94.81%96.02%C2006Target>=92.00%92.50%93.00%93.5C91.00%Data98.82%96.90%94.64%97.09%95.74%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=97.50%97.50%Target B>=96.50%96.50%Target C>=94.50%94.50%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/202 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders were provided an opportunity to comment on targ253A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped tA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part C slippage, if applicableMultiple factors affected the return rate of surveys. Although the Part C Office regularly reminds programs to ensure If yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this in5 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline20050.47%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.95%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%Data0.80%1.12%1.24%1.11%1.13%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.00%1.08%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSAnnual State Resident Population Estimates for 6 Race Groups (5 Race Alone Groups and Two or More Races) by Age, Sex, FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The ICC Child Find Subcommittee has recently begun utili20051.36%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%Data2.38%2.78%2.99%2.98%2.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.00%2.46%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3110,055FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,265110,0552.95%2The percent of the overall birth through age three general population receiving early intervention services in Nevada,If the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.83%99.83%99.38%99.88%99.76%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,2222,48699.76%100%NVRDid Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of The Part C Office audits the TRAC data collection system quarterly for this data. The annual monitoring uses the first3210FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianA second verification of the agency's data are conducted through a TRAC desk audit of child records for all programs 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator are valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.92%99.49%94.85%95.10%97.98%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The timeframe covered for the FFY 2018 monitoring covere110FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator is valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quart0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.08%98.87%98.74%97.94%98.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClarification added 4/28/2020,FFY 2016110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of resolution sessions is less than 10. In a reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage000.00%N/AN/AProvide addition9 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten resolution sessions held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to NOPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 20050.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TNone10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provLori Ann Malina-Lovell, DrPHTitle: Clinical Program Planner I / Part C CoordinatorEmail: lamalinalovell@dhhs.nv.govPhoPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SS1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200561.90%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.04%97.57%91.80%97.93%98.31%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage13315098.31%100%96.00%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicablNevada's Definition of Timely Services:Early intervention services identified on the initial and subsequent Individua2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseThe State did not provide the reasons for delay, as required by theBaseline200598.50%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%Data99.72%98.86%99.62%98.64%99.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputClarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders DescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-bTotal number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,265FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in thData for this indicator are generated using the Tracking Resources and Children (TRAC) child data collection system. Thaviors to meet their needs.Progress categories for A, B and C:a. Percent of infants and toddNOTargets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders werA165.25%Data65.25%63.32%70.42%70.91%65.87%A22013Target>=39.94%39.94%40.04%40.04%40.14%A239.94%Data39.94%37.56%41.85%44.48%42.86%B12013Target>=70.76%70.76%70.86%70.86%71.96%B170.76%Data70.76%68.67%76.00%79.17%76.30%B22013Target>=38.24%38.24%38.34%38.34%38.44%B238.24%Data38.24%36.61%37.49%40.43%39.59%C12013Target>=66.08%66.08%66.18%66.18%66.28%C166.08%Data66.08%61.11%73.55%77.51%74.12%C22013Target>=41.70%41.70%41.80%41.80%41.90%C241.70%Data41.70%37.44%46.68%49.63%47.71%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=67.90%67.90%Target A2>=40.14%40.14%Target B1>=71.96%71.96%Target B2>=38.44%38.44%Target C1>=66.28%66.28%Target C2>=41.90%41.90% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,279Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. In130.57%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable toc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it71431.33%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers61326.90%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers26411.58%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s38.48%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did na. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning150.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it91240.02%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers71231.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers863.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for Outcome B2a. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning110.48%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it74832.82%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers77133.83%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1737.59%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CSlippageProvide reasons for C2 slippage, if applicable Nevada demonstrated slippage and did not meet the target for OuThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the ildren in services for six (6) months or longer was not able to be reported due to the followiB. Effectively communicate their children's needs; andC. Help their children develop and learn.(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A2014201520162017A2006Target>=95.00%95.50%96.00%96.50%97.00%A94.29%Data95.83%97.20%94.37%98.05%97.16%B2006Target>=94.00%94.50%95.0%95.50%96.00%B91.32%Data96.44%93.48%93.86%94.81%96.02%C2006Target>=92.00%92.50%93.00%93.5C91.00%Data98.82%96.90%94.64%97.09%95.74%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=97.50%97.50%Target B>=96.50%96.50%Target C>=94.50%94.50%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/202 for Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholders were provided an opportunity to comment on targ253A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped tA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part C slippage, if applicableMultiple factors affected the return rate of surveys. Although the Part C Office regularly reminds programs to ensure If yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representatResponse to actions required in FFY 2017 SPP/APR 4 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this in5 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline20050.47%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.95%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%Data0.80%1.12%1.24%1.11%1.13%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.00%1.08%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSAnnual State Resident Population Estimates for 6 Race Groups (5 Race Alone Groups and Two or More Races) by Age, Sex, FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The ICC Child Find Subcommittee has recently begun utili20051.36%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%Data2.38%2.78%2.99%2.98%2.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.00%2.46%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Clarification added 4/28/2020 for Stakeholder engagement: StakeholSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3110,055FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,265110,0552.95%2The percent of the overall birth through age three general population receiving early intervention services in Nevada,If the State reported less than 100% compliance for the previous reporting period (e.g., for the FFY 2018 SPP/APR, theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.83%99.83%99.38%99.88%99.76%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,2222,48699.76%100%NVRDid Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of The Part C Office audits the TRAC data collection system quarterly for this data. The annual monitoring uses the first3210FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianA second verification of the agency's data are conducted through a TRAC desk audit of child records for all programs 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator are valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.92%99.49%94.85%95.10%97.98%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The timeframe covered for the FFY 2018 monitoring covere110FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplian8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseOSEP cannot determine if the FFY 2018 data for this indicator is valid and reliable based on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quart0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.08%98.87%98.74%97.94%98.51%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data we5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClarification added 4/28/2020,FFY 2016110FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliance is correctly implementing the regulatory requirementsStates are not required to establish baseline or targets if the number of resolution sessions is less than 10. In a reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage000.00%N/AN/AProvide addition9 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten resolution sessions held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to NOPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 20050.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=0.00%0.00%FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TNone10 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported fewer than ten mediations held in FFY 2018. The State is not required to provLori Ann Malina-Lovell, DrPHTitle: Clinical Program Planner I / Part C CoordinatorEmail: lamalinalovell@dhhs.nv.govPhoPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part C

(Grant Year 2018–2019 — Issued June 23, 2020)
How the department made determinations

Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Last modified on September 15, 2020

2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Nevada

About IDEA

Subscribe for Updates

About IDEA

Subscribe for Updates

Connect with Us