2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Nebraska
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
PDF2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Nebraska
MS WORDView PDF
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600
www.ed.gov
The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by
fostering educational excellence and ensuring equ al access.
U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION
O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES
June 23, 2020
Honorable Dr. Matthew L. Blomstedt
Commissioner of Education
Nebraska Department of Education
301 Centennial Mall South,
P.O. Box 94987
Lincoln , Nebraska 68509
Dear Commissioner Blomstedt :
I am w riting to advise you of the U. S. Department of Education’s (Department) 2020
determination under section 616 and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA). The Department has determined that Nebraska needs intervention in implementing the
requirements of Part C of the IDEA. This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data
and information, including the Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 State Performance Plan/Annual
Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State - reported data, and other publicly available
information.
Your State’s 2020 determination is based on the data reflected in the State’s “2020 Part C
Results - Driven Accountability Matrix” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for
each State and consists of:
(1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other
compliance factors;
(2) a Results Matrix that includes scoring on Results Elements;
(3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score;
(4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Compliance Score and t he Results Score; and
(5) the State’s Determination.
The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made
Determinations under Section 616(d) and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
in 2020: Part C” (HTDMD).
The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is continuing to use both results data and
compliance data in making determinations in 2020, as it did for Part C determinations in 2014,
2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. (The specifics of the deter mination procedures and criteria
are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your State.) For 2020, the
Department’s IDEA Part C determinations continue to include consideration of each State’s
Page 2 — Lead Agency Director
Child Outcomes data, which measures how chi ldren who receive IDEA Part C services are
improving functioning in three outcome areas that are critical to school readiness:
• Positive social - emotional skills;
• acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication);
and
• us e of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs .
Specifically, the Department considered the data quality and the child performance levels in each
State’s Child Outcomes FFY 2018 data .
You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your State’s SPP/APR an d other relevant data
by accessing the EMAPS SPP/APR reporting tool using your State - specific log - on information at
https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find, in
Indicators 1 through 10, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is
required to take. The actions that the State is required to take are in two places:
(1) actions related to the correction of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP
Response” section of the indicator; and
(2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Actions” section of
the indicator.
It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include
language in the “OSEP Response” and/or “Required Action s” sections.
You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments:
(1) the State’s RDA Matrix;
(2) the HTDMD document;
(3) a spreadsheet entitled “2020 Data Rubric Part C,” which shows how OSEP calculated the
State’s “Timely and Accurat e State - Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and
(4) a document entitled “Dispute Resolution 2018 - 20 19,” which includes the IDEA section
618 data that OSEP used to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and
“Timely Due Process Hear ing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix; and
(5) a Data Display, which presents certain State - reported data in a transparent, user - friendly
manner and is helpful for the public in getting a broader picture of State performance in
key areas.
As noted ab ove, the Department has determined that Nebraska needs intervention in
implementing the requirements of Part C of IDEA. The Department identifies a State as needing
intervention under IDEA Part C if its RDA Percentage is less than 60%. Nebraska ’s RDA
Perce ntage is 48.21%. The major factors contributing to the Nebraska’s 2020 Needs Intervention
determination are: (1) the State’s low performance under Indicator 8A ( t imely transition plan ) ;
and (2) the State ’s RDA score of zero for the child performance data elements .
1. Low Performance under Indicator 8A
The data that the State provided in its FFY 2018 SPP/APR demonstrate noncompliance with the
transition requirements under s ections 636(a )(3) and ( d)( 8 ) and 637(a)(9) (c) of the IDEA and 34
Page 3 — Lead Agency Director
C.F.R. § § 303 .209(d) and 303.344(h) . Under Indicator 8A the State wa s required to provide data
on the percentage of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transition planning for
whom the Lead Agency has d eveloped an individualized family service plan ( IFSP ) with
transition steps and services at least 90 day s, and at the discretion of all parties, not more than
nine months, prior to the toddler's third birthday . In its FFY 2018 SPP/APR, the State’s reported
FFY 2018 data for Indicator 8A were 51.85 percent. These data reflect slippage from the FFY
2017 data of 93.06 percent the State reported for Indicator 8A in its FFY 201 7 SPP/APR.
2. RDA Score of Zero for Certain Results Elements
In the 2020 Part C Results Matrix, the State received a score of zero on both child performance
data elements (i.e., comparin g the State’s FFY 2018 outcomes data to other State’s FFY 2018
outcome data and comparing the State’s FFY 2018 data to the State’s FFY 2017 data). This
means that the State’s FFY 2018 child outcome results data w ere low relative to the data
provided by oth er grantees for FFY 2018 and low compared to the State’s own FFY 2017 child
outcomes data.
Pursuant to section 616(d)(2)(B) and 642 of the IDEA and 34 C.F.R. § 303.703(b)(2), a State that
is determined to be “needs intervention” or “needs substantial inter vention” and does not agree
with this determination, may request an opportunity to meet with the Assistant Secretary to
demonstrate why the Department should change the State’s determination. To request a hearing,
submit a letter to Mark Schultz , Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of
the Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202 within 15 days of the date of
this letter. The letter must include the basis for your request for a change in your State’s
determination.
States were required to submit Phase III Year Four of the SSIP by April 1, 2020. OSEP
appreciates the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve res ults for students
with disabilities. We have carefully reviewed and responded to your submission and will provide
additional feedback in the upcoming weeks. Additionally, OSEP will continue to work with your
State as it implements the fifth year of Phase I II of the SSIP, which is due on April 1, 2021.
As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State lead
agency’s website, on the performance of each early intervention service (EIS) program located in
the State on the tar gets in the SPP/APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days after
the State’s submission of its FFY 2018 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must:
(1) review EIS program performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR;
(2) determine if each EIS progra m “meets the requirements” of Part C, or “needs assistance,”
“needs intervention,” or “needs substantial intervention” in implementing Part C of the
IDEA ;
(3) take appropriate enforcement action; and
(4) inform each EIS program of its determination.
Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the SEA’s
website. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that:
Page 4 — Lead Agency Director
(1) includes the State’s determinatio n letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments , and all State
attachments that a re a ccessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973 ; and
(2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to im prove results for infants and toddlers with disabilities
and looks forward to working with your State over the next year as we continue our important
work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and their families. Please contact your
OSEP Sta te Lead if you have any questions, would like to discuss this further, or want to request
technical assistance.
Sincerely,
Laurie VanderPloeg
Director
Office of Special Education Programs
cc: State Part C Coordinator
View File
2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Nebraska
State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent consFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%98.55%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on tFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage119119100.00%100%100.00%Met TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to excCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in FFY 2017Findings of Noncompliance IdentifiedFindings of Noncompli00Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindiFindings Not Yet Verified as Corrected1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP Response1 - Required ActionsIndicator 2: Services in Natural EnvironmentsInstructions and MeasurementMonitorin200591.03%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.75%96.75%97.00%97.50%98.00%Data98.40%98.32%98.27%98.98%99.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=98.20%98.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primaSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs2,11FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in theProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)2 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone2 - OSEP ResponseThe Stf knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); andC. Use of appropriate behDoes your State's Part C eligibility criteria include infants and toddlers who are at risk of having substantial develo40.00%40.50%41.00%A139.46%Data39.46%58.01%53.77%55.68%44.28%A22013Target>=43.60%43.70%44.50%45.50%46.00%A243.69%Data43.69%29.20%27.91%29.45%29.51%B12013Target>=40.10%40.20%40.50%41.00%41.50%B140.23%Data40.23%50.39%46.09%45.22%39.41%B22013Target>=33.40%33.50%34.00%34.50%35.00%B233.53%Data33.53%26.69%22.77%23.10%29.31%C12013Target>=55.70%55.80%56.5%57.00%58.50%C155.79%Data55.79%71.47%58.87%64.71%87.32%C22013Target>=71.10%71.20%72.00%73.74.00%C271.18%Data71.18%53.76%50.31%63.37%90.20%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=41.50%41.50%Target A2>=47.00%47.00%Target B1>=42.50%42.50%Target B2>=36.00%36.00%Target C1>=60.00%60.00%Target C2>=75.00%75.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,014Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Inf121.18%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it21020.71%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers14614.40%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10910.75%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who su25.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A1 slippage, if applicable This year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data da. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.79%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it16916.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers13613.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10510.36%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B,Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThis year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data demonstrated a decline in Summary Sa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it141.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers28027.61%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65164.20%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C,No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months bThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforeDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the None3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.C. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped2006Target>=83.00%83.00%84.0%85.00%86.00%A73.80%Data85.26%86.35%86.33%85.92%87.37%B2006Target>=80.50%81.00%81.50%82.00B70.50%Data80.94%83.75%84.80%84.62%86.39%C2006Target>=91.30%91.30%91.40%91.50%91.60%C84.00%Data91.36%92.60%95.84%88.74%89.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=82.60%82.60%Target C>=91.70%91.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whe2,222Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,658A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightsB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commuC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know B. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effecC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help Was sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families eInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of tThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIndicator 5:FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.57%0.57%0.60%0.63%0.66%Data0.61%0.75%0.80%1.01%1.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.70%0.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 125,809FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage28125,8091.03%0.70%5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - RequireFFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.81%1.84%1.86%1.88%1.90%Data1.85%1.91%2.06%2.32%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.92%1.92%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 378,751FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,11878,7512.46%1.9Compare your results to the national dataNebraska has seen an increase in the birth to 3 population served in the stateProvide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP's response table for the preFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.15%99.11%85.51%93.66%97.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asseFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage10111997.22%100%84.87%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasonsThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliancYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, tdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent dFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data84.00%91.67%75.76%69.23%93.06%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the sDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. The Nebraska Department of Education (N0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'sFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data92.00%100.00%96.97%76.92%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at tWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS prog3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseAlthough the State's FFY 2018 data represent slippage from the FFYNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not usedSSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoluSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoluTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whenFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional inf9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agre0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders when establishing policy, regulation or impleFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Taemic Improvement PlanThe State did not submit 508 compliant attachments. Non-compliant attachmamy.rhone@nebraska.govPhone: 4024714323Submitted on: 04/27/20 1:47:50 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent consFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%98.55%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on tFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage119119100.00%100%100.00%Met TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to excCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in FFY 2017Findings of Noncompliance IdentifiedFindings of Noncompli00Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindiFindings Not Yet Verified as Corrected1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP Response1 - Required ActionsIndicator 2: Services in Natural EnvironmentsInstructions and MeasurementMonitorin200591.03%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.75%96.75%97.00%97.50%98.00%Data98.40%98.32%98.27%98.98%99.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=98.20%98.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primaSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs2,11FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in theProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)2 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone2 - OSEP ResponseThe Stf knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); andC. Use of appropriate behDoes your State's Part C eligibility criteria include infants and toddlers who are at risk of having substantial develo40.00%40.50%41.00%A139.46%Data39.46%58.01%53.77%55.68%44.28%A22013Target>=43.60%43.70%44.50%45.50%46.00%A243.69%Data43.69%29.20%27.91%29.45%29.51%B12013Target>=40.10%40.20%40.50%41.00%41.50%B140.23%Data40.23%50.39%46.09%45.22%39.41%B22013Target>=33.40%33.50%34.00%34.50%35.00%B233.53%Data33.53%26.69%22.77%23.10%29.31%C12013Target>=55.70%55.80%56.5%57.00%58.50%C155.79%Data55.79%71.47%58.87%64.71%87.32%C22013Target>=71.10%71.20%72.00%73.74.00%C271.18%Data71.18%53.76%50.31%63.37%90.20%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=41.50%41.50%Target A2>=47.00%47.00%Target B1>=42.50%42.50%Target B2>=36.00%36.00%Target C1>=60.00%60.00%Target C2>=75.00%75.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,014Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Inf121.18%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it21020.71%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers14614.40%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10910.75%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who su25.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A1 slippage, if applicable This year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data da. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.79%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it16916.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers13613.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10510.36%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B,Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThis year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data demonstrated a decline in Summary Sa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it141.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers28027.61%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65164.20%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C,No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months bThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforeDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the None3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.C. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped2006Target>=83.00%83.00%84.0%85.00%86.00%A73.80%Data85.26%86.35%86.33%85.92%87.37%B2006Target>=80.50%81.00%81.50%82.00B70.50%Data80.94%83.75%84.80%84.62%86.39%C2006Target>=91.30%91.30%91.40%91.50%91.60%C84.00%Data91.36%92.60%95.84%88.74%89.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=82.60%82.60%Target C>=91.70%91.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whe2,222Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,658A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightsB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commuC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know B. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effecC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help Was sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families eInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of tThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIndicator 5:FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.57%0.57%0.60%0.63%0.66%Data0.61%0.75%0.80%1.01%1.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.70%0.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 125,809FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage28125,8091.03%0.70%5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - RequireFFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.81%1.84%1.86%1.88%1.90%Data1.85%1.91%2.06%2.32%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.92%1.92%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 378,751FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,11878,7512.46%1.9Compare your results to the national dataNebraska has seen an increase in the birth to 3 population served in the stateProvide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP's response table for the preFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.15%99.11%85.51%93.66%97.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asseFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage10111997.22%100%84.87%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasonsThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliancYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, tdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent dFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data84.00%91.67%75.76%69.23%93.06%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the sDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. The Nebraska Department of Education (N0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'sFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data92.00%100.00%96.97%76.92%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at tWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS prog3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseAlthough the State's FFY 2018 data represent slippage from the FFYNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not usedSSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoluSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoluTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whenFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional inf9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agre0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders when establishing policy, regulation or impleFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Taemic Improvement PlanThe State did not submit 508 compliant attachments. Non-compliant attachmamy.rhone@nebraska.govPhone: 4024714323Submitted on: 04/27/20 1:47:50 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent consFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%98.55%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on tFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage119119100.00%100%100.00%Met TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to excCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in FFY 2017Findings of Noncompliance IdentifiedFindings of Noncompli00Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindiFindings Not Yet Verified as Corrected1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP Response1 - Required ActionsIndicator 2: Services in Natural EnvironmentsInstructions and MeasurementMonitorin200591.03%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.75%96.75%97.00%97.50%98.00%Data98.40%98.32%98.27%98.98%99.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=98.20%98.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primaSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs2,11FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in theProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)2 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone2 - OSEP ResponseThe Stf knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); andC. Use of appropriate behDoes your State's Part C eligibility criteria include infants and toddlers who are at risk of having substantial develo40.00%40.50%41.00%A139.46%Data39.46%58.01%53.77%55.68%44.28%A22013Target>=43.60%43.70%44.50%45.50%46.00%A243.69%Data43.69%29.20%27.91%29.45%29.51%B12013Target>=40.10%40.20%40.50%41.00%41.50%B140.23%Data40.23%50.39%46.09%45.22%39.41%B22013Target>=33.40%33.50%34.00%34.50%35.00%B233.53%Data33.53%26.69%22.77%23.10%29.31%C12013Target>=55.70%55.80%56.5%57.00%58.50%C155.79%Data55.79%71.47%58.87%64.71%87.32%C22013Target>=71.10%71.20%72.00%73.74.00%C271.18%Data71.18%53.76%50.31%63.37%90.20%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=41.50%41.50%Target A2>=47.00%47.00%Target B1>=42.50%42.50%Target B2>=36.00%36.00%Target C1>=60.00%60.00%Target C2>=75.00%75.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,014Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Inf121.18%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it21020.71%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers14614.40%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10910.75%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who su25.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A1 slippage, if applicable This year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data da. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.79%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it16916.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers13613.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10510.36%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B,Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThis year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data demonstrated a decline in Summary Sa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it141.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers28027.61%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65164.20%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C,No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months bThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforeDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the None3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.C. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped2006Target>=83.00%83.00%84.0%85.00%86.00%A73.80%Data85.26%86.35%86.33%85.92%87.37%B2006Target>=80.50%81.00%81.50%82.00B70.50%Data80.94%83.75%84.80%84.62%86.39%C2006Target>=91.30%91.30%91.40%91.50%91.60%C84.00%Data91.36%92.60%95.84%88.74%89.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=82.60%82.60%Target C>=91.70%91.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whe2,222Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,658A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightsB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commuC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know B. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effecC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help Was sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families eInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of tThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIndicator 5:FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.57%0.57%0.60%0.63%0.66%Data0.61%0.75%0.80%1.01%1.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.70%0.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 125,809FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage28125,8091.03%0.70%5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - RequireFFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.81%1.84%1.86%1.88%1.90%Data1.85%1.91%2.06%2.32%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.92%1.92%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 378,751FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,11878,7512.46%1.9Compare your results to the national dataNebraska has seen an increase in the birth to 3 population served in the stateProvide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP's response table for the preFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.15%99.11%85.51%93.66%97.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asseFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage10111997.22%100%84.87%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasonsThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliancYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, tdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent dFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data84.00%91.67%75.76%69.23%93.06%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the sDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. The Nebraska Department of Education (N0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'sFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data92.00%100.00%96.97%76.92%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at tWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS prog3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseAlthough the State's FFY 2018 data represent slippage from the FFYNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not usedSSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoluSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoluTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whenFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional inf9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agre0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders when establishing policy, regulation or impleFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Taemic Improvement PlanThe State did not submit 508 compliant attachments. Non-compliant attachmamy.rhone@nebraska.govPhone: 4024714323Submitted on: 04/27/20 1:47:50 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent consFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%98.55%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on tFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage119119100.00%100%100.00%Met TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to excCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in FFY 2017Findings of Noncompliance IdentifiedFindings of Noncompli00Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindiFindings Not Yet Verified as Corrected1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP Response1 - Required ActionsIndicator 2: Services in Natural EnvironmentsInstructions and MeasurementMonitorin200591.03%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.75%96.75%97.00%97.50%98.00%Data98.40%98.32%98.27%98.98%99.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=98.20%98.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primaSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs2,11FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in theProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)2 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone2 - OSEP ResponseThe Stf knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); andC. Use of appropriate behDoes your State's Part C eligibility criteria include infants and toddlers who are at risk of having substantial develo40.00%40.50%41.00%A139.46%Data39.46%58.01%53.77%55.68%44.28%A22013Target>=43.60%43.70%44.50%45.50%46.00%A243.69%Data43.69%29.20%27.91%29.45%29.51%B12013Target>=40.10%40.20%40.50%41.00%41.50%B140.23%Data40.23%50.39%46.09%45.22%39.41%B22013Target>=33.40%33.50%34.00%34.50%35.00%B233.53%Data33.53%26.69%22.77%23.10%29.31%C12013Target>=55.70%55.80%56.5%57.00%58.50%C155.79%Data55.79%71.47%58.87%64.71%87.32%C22013Target>=71.10%71.20%72.00%73.74.00%C271.18%Data71.18%53.76%50.31%63.37%90.20%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=41.50%41.50%Target A2>=47.00%47.00%Target B1>=42.50%42.50%Target B2>=36.00%36.00%Target C1>=60.00%60.00%Target C2>=75.00%75.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,014Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Inf121.18%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it21020.71%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers14614.40%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10910.75%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who su25.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A1 slippage, if applicable This year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data da. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.79%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it16916.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers13613.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10510.36%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B,Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThis year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data demonstrated a decline in Summary Sa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it141.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers28027.61%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65164.20%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C,No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months bThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforeDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the None3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.C. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped2006Target>=83.00%83.00%84.0%85.00%86.00%A73.80%Data85.26%86.35%86.33%85.92%87.37%B2006Target>=80.50%81.00%81.50%82.00B70.50%Data80.94%83.75%84.80%84.62%86.39%C2006Target>=91.30%91.30%91.40%91.50%91.60%C84.00%Data91.36%92.60%95.84%88.74%89.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=82.60%82.60%Target C>=91.70%91.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whe2,222Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,658A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightsB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commuC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know B. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effecC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help Was sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families eInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of tThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIndicator 5:FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.57%0.57%0.60%0.63%0.66%Data0.61%0.75%0.80%1.01%1.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.70%0.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 125,809FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage28125,8091.03%0.70%5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - RequireFFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.81%1.84%1.86%1.88%1.90%Data1.85%1.91%2.06%2.32%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.92%1.92%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 378,751FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,11878,7512.46%1.9Compare your results to the national dataNebraska has seen an increase in the birth to 3 population served in the stateProvide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP's response table for the preFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.15%99.11%85.51%93.66%97.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asseFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage10111997.22%100%84.87%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasonsThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliancYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, tdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent dFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data84.00%91.67%75.76%69.23%93.06%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the sDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. The Nebraska Department of Education (N0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'sFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data92.00%100.00%96.97%76.92%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at tWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS prog3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseAlthough the State's FFY 2018 data represent slippage from the FFYNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not usedSSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoluSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoluTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whenFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional inf9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agre0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders when establishing policy, regulation or impleFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Taemic Improvement PlanThe State did not submit 508 compliant attachments. Non-compliant attachmamy.rhone@nebraska.govPhone: 4024714323Submitted on: 04/27/20 1:47:50 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent consFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%98.55%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on tFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage119119100.00%100%100.00%Met TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to excCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in FFY 2017Findings of Noncompliance IdentifiedFindings of Noncompli00Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindiFindings Not Yet Verified as Corrected1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP Response1 - Required ActionsIndicator 2: Services in Natural EnvironmentsInstructions and MeasurementMonitorin200591.03%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.75%96.75%97.00%97.50%98.00%Data98.40%98.32%98.27%98.98%99.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=98.20%98.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primaSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs2,11FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in theProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)2 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone2 - OSEP ResponseThe Stf knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); andC. Use of appropriate behDoes your State's Part C eligibility criteria include infants and toddlers who are at risk of having substantial develo40.00%40.50%41.00%A139.46%Data39.46%58.01%53.77%55.68%44.28%A22013Target>=43.60%43.70%44.50%45.50%46.00%A243.69%Data43.69%29.20%27.91%29.45%29.51%B12013Target>=40.10%40.20%40.50%41.00%41.50%B140.23%Data40.23%50.39%46.09%45.22%39.41%B22013Target>=33.40%33.50%34.00%34.50%35.00%B233.53%Data33.53%26.69%22.77%23.10%29.31%C12013Target>=55.70%55.80%56.5%57.00%58.50%C155.79%Data55.79%71.47%58.87%64.71%87.32%C22013Target>=71.10%71.20%72.00%73.74.00%C271.18%Data71.18%53.76%50.31%63.37%90.20%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=41.50%41.50%Target A2>=47.00%47.00%Target B1>=42.50%42.50%Target B2>=36.00%36.00%Target C1>=60.00%60.00%Target C2>=75.00%75.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,014Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Inf121.18%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it21020.71%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers14614.40%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10910.75%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who su25.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A1 slippage, if applicable This year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data da. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.79%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it16916.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers13613.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10510.36%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B,Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThis year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data demonstrated a decline in Summary Sa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it141.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers28027.61%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65164.20%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C,No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months bThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforeDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the None3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.C. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped2006Target>=83.00%83.00%84.0%85.00%86.00%A73.80%Data85.26%86.35%86.33%85.92%87.37%B2006Target>=80.50%81.00%81.50%82.00B70.50%Data80.94%83.75%84.80%84.62%86.39%C2006Target>=91.30%91.30%91.40%91.50%91.60%C84.00%Data91.36%92.60%95.84%88.74%89.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=82.60%82.60%Target C>=91.70%91.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whe2,222Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,658A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightsB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commuC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know B. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effecC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help Was sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families eInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of tThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIndicator 5:FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.57%0.57%0.60%0.63%0.66%Data0.61%0.75%0.80%1.01%1.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.70%0.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 125,809FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage28125,8091.03%0.70%5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - RequireFFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.81%1.84%1.86%1.88%1.90%Data1.85%1.91%2.06%2.32%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.92%1.92%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 378,751FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,11878,7512.46%1.9Compare your results to the national dataNebraska has seen an increase in the birth to 3 population served in the stateProvide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP's response table for the preFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.15%99.11%85.51%93.66%97.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asseFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage10111997.22%100%84.87%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasonsThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliancYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, tdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent dFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data84.00%91.67%75.76%69.23%93.06%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the sDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. The Nebraska Department of Education (N0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'sFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data92.00%100.00%96.97%76.92%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at tWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS prog3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseAlthough the State's FFY 2018 data represent slippage from the FFYNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not usedSSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoluSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoluTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whenFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional inf9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agre0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders when establishing policy, regulation or impleFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Taemic Improvement PlanThe State did not submit 508 compliant attachments. Non-compliant attachmamy.rhone@nebraska.govPhone: 4024714323Submitted on: 04/27/20 1:47:50 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisabInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the StIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III, Year Four, of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIThe State's timeliness measure for this indicator must be either: (1) a time period that runs from when the parent consFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%98.55%100.0%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on tFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage119119100.00%100%100.00%Met TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributable to excCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in FFY 2017Findings of Noncompliance IdentifiedFindings of Noncompli00Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindiFindings Not Yet Verified as Corrected1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP Response1 - Required ActionsIndicator 2: Services in Natural EnvironmentsInstructions and MeasurementMonitorin200591.03%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.75%96.75%97.00%97.50%98.00%Data98.40%98.32%98.27%98.98%99.49%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=98.20%98.20%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primaSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs2,11FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in theProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)2 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone2 - OSEP ResponseThe Stf knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); andC. Use of appropriate behDoes your State's Part C eligibility criteria include infants and toddlers who are at risk of having substantial develo40.00%40.50%41.00%A139.46%Data39.46%58.01%53.77%55.68%44.28%A22013Target>=43.60%43.70%44.50%45.50%46.00%A243.69%Data43.69%29.20%27.91%29.45%29.51%B12013Target>=40.10%40.20%40.50%41.00%41.50%B140.23%Data40.23%50.39%46.09%45.22%39.41%B22013Target>=33.40%33.50%34.00%34.50%35.00%B233.53%Data33.53%26.69%22.77%23.10%29.31%C12013Target>=55.70%55.80%56.5%57.00%58.50%C155.79%Data55.79%71.47%58.87%64.71%87.32%C22013Target>=71.10%71.20%72.00%73.74.00%C271.18%Data71.18%53.76%50.31%63.37%90.20%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=41.50%41.50%Target A2>=47.00%47.00%Target B1>=42.50%42.50%Target B2>=36.00%36.00%Target C1>=60.00%60.00%Target C2>=75.00%75.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed1,014Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Inf121.18%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it21020.71%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers14614.40%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10910.75%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who su25.15%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for A1 slippage, if applicable This year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data da. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.79%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it16916.67%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers13613.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers10510.36%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B,Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThis year Nebraska's Part C OSEP data demonstrated a decline in Summary Sa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning00.00%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-agc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it141.38%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers28027.61%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65164.20%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C,No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months bThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforeDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide the None3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.C. Percent= [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped2006Target>=83.00%83.00%84.0%85.00%86.00%A73.80%Data85.26%86.35%86.33%85.92%87.37%B2006Target>=80.50%81.00%81.50%82.00B70.50%Data80.94%83.75%84.80%84.62%86.39%C2006Target>=91.30%91.30%91.40%91.50%91.60%C84.00%Data91.36%92.60%95.84%88.74%89.84%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=87.00%87.00%Target B>=82.60%82.60%Target C>=91.70%91.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whe2,222Number of respondent families participating in Part C 1,658A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightsB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commuC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the fC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childrFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know B. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effecC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help Was sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families eInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of tThe State provided FFY 2019 targets for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIndicator 5:FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.57%0.57%0.60%0.63%0.66%Data0.61%0.75%0.80%1.01%1.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.70%0.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 125,809FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage28125,8091.03%0.70%5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 - RequireFFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.81%1.84%1.86%1.88%1.90%Data1.85%1.91%2.06%2.32%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.92%1.92%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakehPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 378,751FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with Population of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage2,11878,7512.46%1.9Compare your results to the national dataNebraska has seen an increase in the birth to 3 population served in the stateProvide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP's response table for the preFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data96.15%99.11%85.51%93.66%97.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asseFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage10111997.22%100%84.87%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasonsThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l4400FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliancYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, tdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent dFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data84.00%91.67%75.76%69.23%93.06%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transiNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitiThe Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), acting as co-l5500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on the sDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect theFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days priState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. The Nebraska Department of Education (N0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AP8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEP'sFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data92.00%100.00%96.97%76.92%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at tWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS prog3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEach EIS program was required t8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseAlthough the State's FFY 2018 data represent slippage from the FFYNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. NOSelect yes to use target ranges. Target Range not usedSSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resoluSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resoluTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders whenFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional inf9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agre0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputStakeholder Involvement: Nebraska regularly seeks input from stakeholders when establishing policy, regulation or impleFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Taemic Improvement PlanThe State did not submit 508 compliant attachments. Non-compliant attachmamy.rhone@nebraska.govPhone: 4024714323Submitted on: 04/27/20 1:47:50 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part C
(Grant Year 2018–2019 — Issued June 23, 2020)
How the department made determinations
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-80809 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on September 15, 2020