2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Iowa - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

OSEP Response to SPP/APR

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600 www.ed.gov The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES June 23, 20 20 Honorable Ann Lebo Director Iowa Department of Education Grimes State Office Building 400 East 14th Street Des Moines , Iowa 50319 Dear Director Lebo : I am writing to advise you of the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) 2020 determination under sections 616 and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Department has determined that Iowa needs assistance in meeting the r equirements of Part C of the IDEA . This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data and information, including the Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State - reported data, and other publicly available information. Your State’s 2020 determination is based on the data reflected in the State’s “ 2020 Part C Results - Driven Accountability Matri x” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for each State and consists of: (1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other compliance factors; (2) Results Components and Appendices that include scoring on Results Elements ; (3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score; (4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Compliance Score and the Results Score; and (5) the State’s Determination. The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made Determinations under Sections 616(d) and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 2020 : Part C” (HTDMD). The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is continuing to use both results data and compliance data in making the Department’s determinations in 202 0 , as it did for the Part C determinations in 2015, 201 6 , 201 7, 2018, and 2019 . (The specifics of the determination procedures and criteria are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your State.) For 2020 , the Department’s IDEA Part C d eterminations continue to include consideration Page 2 — Lead Agency Director of each State’s Child Outcomes data, which measure how children who receive Part C services are improving functioning in three outcome areas that are critical to school readiness: • p ositive social - emotional s kills; • acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); and • use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs . Specifically, the Department considered the data quality and the child performance levels in each State’s Child Outcomes FFY 2018 data . You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your State’s SPP/APR and other relevant data by accessing the EMAPS SPP/APR reporting tool using your State - specific log - on information at https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find, in Indicators 1 through 10, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is required to take. The acti ons that the State is required to take are in two places: (1) actions related to the correction of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP Response” section of the indicator; and (2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Ac tions” section of the indicator. It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include language in the “OSEP Response” and/or “Required Actions” sections. You will also find all of the following important documents save d as attachments to the Progress Page: (1) the State’s RDA Matrix; (2) the HTDMD document; (3) a spreadsheet entitled “ 2020 Data Rubric Part C,” which shows how OSEP calculated the State’s “Timely and Accurate State - Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; an d (4) a document entitled “Dispute Resolution 201 8 - 1 9 ,” which includes the IDEA section 618 data that OSEP used to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and “Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix. As noted ab ove, the State’s 2020 determination is Needs Assistance. A State’s 2020 RDA Determination is Needs Assistance if the RDA Percentage is at least 60% but less than 80%. A State would also be Needs Assistance if its RDA Determination percentage is 80% or above, but the Department has imposed Special or Specific Conditions on the State’s last three IDEA Part C grant awards (for FFYs 201 7 , 201 8 , and 2019 ), and those Specific Conditions are in effect at the time of the 20 20 determination. The State’s determination for 2019 was also Needs Assistance. In accordance with section 616(e)(1) of the IDEA and 34 C.F.R. § 303.704(a), if a State is determined to need assistance for two consecutive years, the Secretary must take one or more of the following actions: Page 3 — Lead Agency Director (1) advise the State of available sources of technical assistance that may help the State address the areas in which the State needs assistance and require the State to work with appropriate entities; and/or (2) identify the State as a high - risk grantee and impose Special Conditio ns on the State’s IDEA Part C grant award. Pursuant to these requirements, the Secretary is advising the State of available sources of technical assistance, including OSEP - funded technical assistance centers and resources at the following website: https://osep.grads360.org/#program/highlighted - resources , and requiring the State to work with appropriate entities. In additi on, the State should consider accessing technical assistance from other Department - funded centers such as the Comprehensive Centers with resources at the following link: https ://compcenternetwork.org/states . The Secretary directs the State to determine the results elements and/or compliance indicators, and improvement strategies, on which it will focus its use of available technical assistance, in order to improve its performan ce. We strongly encourage the State to access technical assistance related to those results elements and compliance indicators for which the State received a score of zero. Your State must report with its FFY 2019 SPP/APR submission, due February 1 , 2 021 , on: (1) the technical assistance sources from which the State received assistance; and (2) the actions the State took as a result of that technical assistance. As required by IDEA section 616(e)(7) and 34 C . F . R . § 303.706, your State must notify the public that the Secretary of Education has taken the above enforcement action, including, at a minimum, by posting a public notice on its website and distributing the notice to the media and to early intervention service ( EIS ) programs. States were required to su bmit Phase III Year Four of the SSIP by April 1 , 20 20 . OSEP appreciates the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. We have carefully reviewed and responded to your submission and will provide additional feedback in the upcoming weeks. Additionally, OSEP will continue to work with your State as it implements the fifth year of Phase III of the SSIP, which is due on April 1, 20 21 . As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State lead agency’s website, on the performance of each EIS program located in the State on the targets in the SPP/APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days after the State’s submission of its FFY 2018 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must: (1) review EIS program performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR; (2) determine if each EIS program “meets the requirements” of Part C, or “needs assistance,” “needs intervention,” or “needs substantial interventi on” in implementing Part C of the IDEA ; (3) take appropriate enforcement action; and (4) inform each EIS program of its determination. Page 4 — Lead Agency Director Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the State lead agency’s website. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that: (1) includes the State’s determination letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments , and all State attachments that a re a ccessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ; and (2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website. OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families and looks forward to working with your State over the next year as we conti nue our important work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and their families. Please contact your OSEP State Lead if you have any questions, would like to discuss this further, or want to request technical assistance. Sincerely, Laurie VanderPloeg Director Office of Special Education Programs cc: State Part C Coordinator

View File

2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Iowa

State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to section 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.86%97.19%99.56%98.80%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage6369199.56%100%98.26%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicabProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,Baseline200596.10%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%Data98.51%98.92%98.69%99.07%98.39%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.60%96.60%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulatedSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=44.63%44.63%45.13%45.63%46.13%A140.13%Data46.53%45.22%49.74%45.53%46.36%A2208Target>=69.90%69.90%70.40%70.90%71.40%A265.40%Data71.40%68.00%69.81%65.24%60.46%B12008Target>=50.33%50.33%50.83%51.33%51.83%B145.83%Data50.26%49.70%53.03%50.48%53.86%B22008Target>=50.09%50.09%50.59%551.59%B245.59%Data54.38%52.06%54.19%48.39%44.20%C12008Target>=56.08%56.08%56.58%57.08%57.58%C151.58%Data58.99%56.56%59.42%58.54%55.02%C22008Target>=71.24%71.24%71.74%72.24%72.74%C266.74%Data72.77%69.83%71.78%68.24%63.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=46.63%46.63%Target A2>=71.90%71.90%Target B1>=52.33%52.33%Target B2>=52.09%52.09%Target C1>=58.08%58.08%Target C2>=73.24%73.24% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,140Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.37%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1687.85%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers43120.14%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers84639.53%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percen71.90%59.67%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early lana. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning140.65%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it33115.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers60328.18%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers31614.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableData indicate the percent of infants and toddlers who substantially inca. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning90.42%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1868.69%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers62829.35%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers72233.74%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%A89.90%Data84.02%79.84%83.80%81.45%86.75%B2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%B89.20%Data87.57%85.86%87.21%88.19%90.06%C2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%C90.50%Data84.91%83.25%86.35%85.54%87.95TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=93.00%93.00%Target B>=93.00%93.00%Target C>=93.00%93.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDFFY 2018 SPP/APR DataThe number of families to whom surveys were distributed1,376Number of respondent families particA1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Data indicate the percent of families reporting early intervention services helped them know their rights was below tNODescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. Samples were puIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions420051.22%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.30%1.35%1.35%1.40%1.40%Data1.68%1.61%1.56%1.13%1.08%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.45%1.45%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 138,291FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage45038,2911.08%1.45 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.5 - RequiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.50%2.50%2.60%2.60%2.70%Data3.03%2.94%2.91%2.50%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.70%2.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3117,367FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 wiPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,038117,3672.46%None6 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.6 - RBaseline200587.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.68%99.29%99.72%99.49%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0463,68699.56%100%99.13%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumberProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in F151500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,dhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.76%99.47%99.16%98.01%96.78%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely tranNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabiliProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The reasons for delays in 1.6% of services was due to a272700FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days pState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All nine regional grantees in the sta0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEPFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.71%99.30%98.70%98.19%98.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and atDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All regional grantees were selected for monitoring as9900FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 201Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable bDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish bSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surv11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputSee attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDThe state of Iowa has hadFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 emic Improvement Plan EMBED Word.Document.12 s CertificationInstructionsChoose the app04/23/20 6:09:47 PM34;Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5 CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to section 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.86%97.19%99.56%98.80%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage6369199.56%100%98.26%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicabProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,Baseline200596.10%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%Data98.51%98.92%98.69%99.07%98.39%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.60%96.60%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulatedSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=44.63%44.63%45.13%45.63%46.13%A140.13%Data46.53%45.22%49.74%45.53%46.36%A2208Target>=69.90%69.90%70.40%70.90%71.40%A265.40%Data71.40%68.00%69.81%65.24%60.46%B12008Target>=50.33%50.33%50.83%51.33%51.83%B145.83%Data50.26%49.70%53.03%50.48%53.86%B22008Target>=50.09%50.09%50.59%551.59%B245.59%Data54.38%52.06%54.19%48.39%44.20%C12008Target>=56.08%56.08%56.58%57.08%57.58%C151.58%Data58.99%56.56%59.42%58.54%55.02%C22008Target>=71.24%71.24%71.74%72.24%72.74%C266.74%Data72.77%69.83%71.78%68.24%63.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=46.63%46.63%Target A2>=71.90%71.90%Target B1>=52.33%52.33%Target B2>=52.09%52.09%Target C1>=58.08%58.08%Target C2>=73.24%73.24% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,140Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.37%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1687.85%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers43120.14%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers84639.53%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percen71.90%59.67%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early lana. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning140.65%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it33115.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers60328.18%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers31614.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableData indicate the percent of infants and toddlers who substantially inca. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning90.42%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1868.69%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers62829.35%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers72233.74%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%A89.90%Data84.02%79.84%83.80%81.45%86.75%B2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%B89.20%Data87.57%85.86%87.21%88.19%90.06%C2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%C90.50%Data84.91%83.25%86.35%85.54%87.95TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=93.00%93.00%Target B>=93.00%93.00%Target C>=93.00%93.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDFFY 2018 SPP/APR DataThe number of families to whom surveys were distributed1,376Number of respondent families particA1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Data indicate the percent of families reporting early intervention services helped them know their rights was below tNODescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. Samples were puIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions420051.22%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.30%1.35%1.35%1.40%1.40%Data1.68%1.61%1.56%1.13%1.08%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.45%1.45%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 138,291FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage45038,2911.08%1.45 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.5 - RequiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.50%2.50%2.60%2.60%2.70%Data3.03%2.94%2.91%2.50%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.70%2.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3117,367FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 wiPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,038117,3672.46%None6 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.6 - RBaseline200587.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.68%99.29%99.72%99.49%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0463,68699.56%100%99.13%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumberProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in F151500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,dhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.76%99.47%99.16%98.01%96.78%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely tranNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabiliProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The reasons for delays in 1.6% of services was due to a272700FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days pState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All nine regional grantees in the sta0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEPFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.71%99.30%98.70%98.19%98.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and atDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All regional grantees were selected for monitoring as9900FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 201Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable bDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish bSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surv11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputSee attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDThe state of Iowa has hadFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 emic Improvement Plan EMBED Word.Document.12 s CertificationInstructionsChoose the app04/23/20 6:09:47 PM34;Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5 CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to section 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.86%97.19%99.56%98.80%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage6369199.56%100%98.26%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicabProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,Baseline200596.10%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%Data98.51%98.92%98.69%99.07%98.39%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.60%96.60%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulatedSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=44.63%44.63%45.13%45.63%46.13%A140.13%Data46.53%45.22%49.74%45.53%46.36%A2208Target>=69.90%69.90%70.40%70.90%71.40%A265.40%Data71.40%68.00%69.81%65.24%60.46%B12008Target>=50.33%50.33%50.83%51.33%51.83%B145.83%Data50.26%49.70%53.03%50.48%53.86%B22008Target>=50.09%50.09%50.59%551.59%B245.59%Data54.38%52.06%54.19%48.39%44.20%C12008Target>=56.08%56.08%56.58%57.08%57.58%C151.58%Data58.99%56.56%59.42%58.54%55.02%C22008Target>=71.24%71.24%71.74%72.24%72.74%C266.74%Data72.77%69.83%71.78%68.24%63.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=46.63%46.63%Target A2>=71.90%71.90%Target B1>=52.33%52.33%Target B2>=52.09%52.09%Target C1>=58.08%58.08%Target C2>=73.24%73.24% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,140Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.37%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1687.85%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers43120.14%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers84639.53%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percen71.90%59.67%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early lana. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning140.65%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it33115.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers60328.18%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers31614.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableData indicate the percent of infants and toddlers who substantially inca. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning90.42%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1868.69%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers62829.35%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers72233.74%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%A89.90%Data84.02%79.84%83.80%81.45%86.75%B2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%B89.20%Data87.57%85.86%87.21%88.19%90.06%C2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%C90.50%Data84.91%83.25%86.35%85.54%87.95TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=93.00%93.00%Target B>=93.00%93.00%Target C>=93.00%93.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDFFY 2018 SPP/APR DataThe number of families to whom surveys were distributed1,376Number of respondent families particA1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Data indicate the percent of families reporting early intervention services helped them know their rights was below tNODescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. Samples were puIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions420051.22%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.30%1.35%1.35%1.40%1.40%Data1.68%1.61%1.56%1.13%1.08%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.45%1.45%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 138,291FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage45038,2911.08%1.45 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.5 - RequiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.50%2.50%2.60%2.60%2.70%Data3.03%2.94%2.91%2.50%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.70%2.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3117,367FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 wiPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,038117,3672.46%None6 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.6 - RBaseline200587.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.68%99.29%99.72%99.49%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0463,68699.56%100%99.13%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumberProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in F151500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,dhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.76%99.47%99.16%98.01%96.78%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely tranNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabiliProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The reasons for delays in 1.6% of services was due to a272700FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days pState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All nine regional grantees in the sta0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEPFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.71%99.30%98.70%98.19%98.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and atDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All regional grantees were selected for monitoring as9900FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 201Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable bDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish bSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surv11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputSee attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDThe state of Iowa has hadFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 emic Improvement Plan EMBED Word.Document.12 s CertificationInstructionsChoose the app04/23/20 6:09:47 PM34;Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5 CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to section 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.86%97.19%99.56%98.80%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage6369199.56%100%98.26%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicabProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,Baseline200596.10%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%Data98.51%98.92%98.69%99.07%98.39%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.60%96.60%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulatedSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=44.63%44.63%45.13%45.63%46.13%A140.13%Data46.53%45.22%49.74%45.53%46.36%A2208Target>=69.90%69.90%70.40%70.90%71.40%A265.40%Data71.40%68.00%69.81%65.24%60.46%B12008Target>=50.33%50.33%50.83%51.33%51.83%B145.83%Data50.26%49.70%53.03%50.48%53.86%B22008Target>=50.09%50.09%50.59%551.59%B245.59%Data54.38%52.06%54.19%48.39%44.20%C12008Target>=56.08%56.08%56.58%57.08%57.58%C151.58%Data58.99%56.56%59.42%58.54%55.02%C22008Target>=71.24%71.24%71.74%72.24%72.74%C266.74%Data72.77%69.83%71.78%68.24%63.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=46.63%46.63%Target A2>=71.90%71.90%Target B1>=52.33%52.33%Target B2>=52.09%52.09%Target C1>=58.08%58.08%Target C2>=73.24%73.24% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,140Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.37%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1687.85%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers43120.14%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers84639.53%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percen71.90%59.67%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early lana. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning140.65%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it33115.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers60328.18%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers31614.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableData indicate the percent of infants and toddlers who substantially inca. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning90.42%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1868.69%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers62829.35%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers72233.74%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%A89.90%Data84.02%79.84%83.80%81.45%86.75%B2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%B89.20%Data87.57%85.86%87.21%88.19%90.06%C2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%C90.50%Data84.91%83.25%86.35%85.54%87.95TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=93.00%93.00%Target B>=93.00%93.00%Target C>=93.00%93.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDFFY 2018 SPP/APR DataThe number of families to whom surveys were distributed1,376Number of respondent families particA1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Data indicate the percent of families reporting early intervention services helped them know their rights was below tNODescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. Samples were puIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions420051.22%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.30%1.35%1.35%1.40%1.40%Data1.68%1.61%1.56%1.13%1.08%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.45%1.45%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 138,291FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage45038,2911.08%1.45 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.5 - RequiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.50%2.50%2.60%2.60%2.70%Data3.03%2.94%2.91%2.50%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.70%2.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3117,367FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 wiPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,038117,3672.46%None6 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.6 - RBaseline200587.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.68%99.29%99.72%99.49%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0463,68699.56%100%99.13%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumberProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in F151500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,dhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.76%99.47%99.16%98.01%96.78%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely tranNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabiliProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The reasons for delays in 1.6% of services was due to a272700FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days pState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All nine regional grantees in the sta0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEPFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.71%99.30%98.70%98.19%98.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and atDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All regional grantees were selected for monitoring as9900FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 201Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable bDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish bSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surv11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputSee attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDThe state of Iowa has hadFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 emic Improvement Plan EMBED Word.Document.12 s CertificationInstructionsChoose the app04/23/20 6:09:47 PM34;Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5 CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the Intro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to section 61Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.86%97.19%99.56%98.80%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services onFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage6369199.56%100%98.26%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if applicabProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection3300FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,Baseline200596.10%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%96.60%Data98.51%98.92%98.69%99.07%98.39%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=96.60%96.60%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulatedSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who priSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs3,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Inted. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of iHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=44.63%44.63%45.13%45.63%46.13%A140.13%Data46.53%45.22%49.74%45.53%46.36%A2208Target>=69.90%69.90%70.40%70.90%71.40%A265.40%Data71.40%68.00%69.81%65.24%60.46%B12008Target>=50.33%50.33%50.83%51.33%51.83%B145.83%Data50.26%49.70%53.03%50.48%53.86%B22008Target>=50.09%50.09%50.59%551.59%B245.59%Data54.38%52.06%54.19%48.39%44.20%C12008Target>=56.08%56.08%56.58%57.08%57.58%C151.58%Data58.99%56.56%59.42%58.54%55.02%C22008Target>=71.24%71.24%71.74%72.24%72.74%C266.74%Data72.77%69.83%71.78%68.24%63.TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=46.63%46.63%Target A2>=71.90%71.90%Target B1>=52.33%52.33%Target B2>=52.09%52.09%Target C1>=58.08%58.08%Target C2>=73.24%73.24% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,140Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skia. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning80.37%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1687.85%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers43120.14%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers84639.53%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percen71.90%59.67%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early lana. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning140.65%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it33115.47%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers60328.18%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers31614.77%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome Provide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableData indicate the percent of infants and toddlers who substantially inca. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning90.42%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-c. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1868.69%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers62829.35%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers72233.74%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome No SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six monthsThe number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months befoWas sampling used? NODid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the 3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling 93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%A89.90%Data84.02%79.84%83.80%81.45%86.75%B2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%B89.20%Data87.57%85.86%87.21%88.19%90.06%C2005Target>=93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%93.00%C90.50%Data84.91%83.25%86.35%85.54%87.95TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=93.00%93.00%Target B>=93.00%93.00%Target C>=93.00%93.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDFFY 2018 SPP/APR DataThe number of families to whom surveys were distributed1,376Number of respondent families particA1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theA2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their righB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theB2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively comC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped theC2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their chilFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knoB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable Data indicate the percent of families reporting early intervention services helped them know their rights was below tNODescribe the sampling methodology outlining how the design will yield valid and reliable estimates. Samples were puIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and familiesInclude the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions420051.22%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.30%1.35%1.35%1.40%1.40%Data1.68%1.61%1.56%1.13%1.08%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.45%1.45%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 138,291FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage45038,2911.08%1.45 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.5 - RequiFFY20132014201520162017Target >=2.50%2.50%2.60%2.60%2.70%Data3.03%2.94%2.91%2.50%2.46%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=2.70%2.70%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input See attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3117,367FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 wiPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,038117,3672.46%None6 - OSEP Response The State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target.6 - RBaseline200587.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.68%99.29%99.72%99.49%99.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and asFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage3,0463,68699.56%100%99.13%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumberProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified in F151500FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018,dhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parentFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.76%99.47%99.16%98.01%96.78%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely tranNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabiliProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)The reasons for delays in 1.6% of services was due to a272700FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, the State must report on theDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect tFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days pState monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All nine regional grantees in the sta0000Correction of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required Actionsdhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisiIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Provide detailed information about the timely correction of noncompliance as noted in OSEPFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.71%99.30%98.70%98.19%98.14%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transiNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and atDescribe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. All regional grantees were selected for monitoring as9900FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedThe lead agency verified the 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 201Not ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable bDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish bSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surv11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputSee attachment: Introduction Iowa APR FFY18 REVISEDThe state of Iowa has hadFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 emic Improvement Plan EMBED Word.Document.12 s CertificationInstructionsChoose the app04/23/20 6:09:47 PM34;Preloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5 C

(Grant Year 2018–2019 — Issued June 23, 2020)
How the department made determinations

Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Last modified on September 15, 2020

2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Iowa

About IDEA

Subscribe for Updates

About IDEA

Subscribe for Updates

Connect with Us