2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Indiana - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

OSEP Response to SPP/APR

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600 www.ed.gov The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES June 23, 20 20 Honorable Jennifer Walthall, MD, MPH Secretary Indiana Family and Social Services Administration 402 West Washington Street Indianapolis , Indiana 46204 Dear Secretary Wal thall: I am writing to advise you of the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) 2020 determination under sect ions 616 and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Department has determined that Indiana needs assistance in meeting the requirements of Part C of the IDEA . This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data and information, including the Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State - reported data, and other publicly available information. Your State’s 2020 determination is based on the data reflected in the State’s “ 2020 Part C Results - Driven Accountability Matrix” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for each State and consists of: (1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other compliance factors; (2) Results Components and Appendices that include scoring on Results Elements; (3) a Compliance Sc ore and a Results Score; (4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Compliance Score and the Results Score; and (5) the State’s Determination. The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made Determinations under Sections 616(d) a nd 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 2020 : Part C” (HTDMD). The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is continuing to use both results data and compliance data in making the Department’s determinations in 2020 , as it did for the Part C determinations in 2015, 201 6 , 201 7, 2018, and 2019 . (The specifics of the determination procedures and criteria are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your State.) For 2020 , the Department’s IDEA Part C determinations con tinue to include consideration Page 2 — Lead Agency Director of each State’s Child Outcomes data, which measure how children who receive Part C services are improving functioning in three outcome areas that are critical to school readiness: • p ositive social - emotional skills; • acquisiti on and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication); and • use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs . Specifically, the Department considered the data quality and the child performance levels in each State’s Child Outcomes FF Y 2018 data . You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your State’s SPP/APR and other relevant data by accessing the EMAPS SPP/APR reporting tool using your State - specific log - on information at https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find, in Indicators 1 through 10, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is required to take. The actions that the Stat e is required to take are in two places: (1) actions related to the correction of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP Response” section of the indicator; and (2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Actions” section of the indicator. It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include language in the “OSEP Response” and/or “Required Actions” sections. You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments to the Progress Page: (1) the State’s RDA Matrix; (2) the HTDMD document; (3) a spreadsheet entitled “ 2020 Data Rubric Part C,” which shows how OSEP calculated the State’s “Timely and Accurate State - Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and (4) a document enti tled “Dispute Resolution 201 8 - 1 9 ,” which includes the IDEA section 618 data that OSEP used to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and “Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix. As noted above, the State’s 2020 determination is Needs Assistance. A State’s 2020 RDA Determination is Needs Assistance if the RDA Percentage is at least 60% but less than 80%. A State would also be Needs Assistance if its RDA Determination percentage is 80% or above, but the Depart ment has imposed Special or Specific Conditions on the State’s last three IDEA Part C grant awards (for FFYs 201 7 , 201 8 , and 2019 ), and those Specific Conditions are in effect at the time of the 20 20 determination. The State’s determination for 2019 was al so Needs Assistance. In accordance with section 616(e)(1) of the IDEA and 34 C.F.R. § 303.704(a), if a State is determined to need assistance for two consecutive years, the Secretary must take one or more of the following actions: Page 3 — Lead Agency Director (1) advise the State of available sources of technical assistance that may help the State address the areas in which the State needs assistance and require the State to work with appropriate entities; and/or (2) identify the State as a high - risk grantee and impose Special Conditions on the State’s IDEA Part C grant award. Pursuant to these requirements, the Secretary is advising the State of available sources of technical assistance, including OSEP - funded technical assistance centers and resources at the following website: https://osep.grads360.org/#program/highlighted - resources , and requiring the State to work with appropriate en tities. In addition, the State should consider accessing technical assistance from other Department - funded centers such as the Comprehensive Centers with resources at the following link: https://compcenternetwork.org/states . The Secretary directs the State to determine the results elements and/or compliance indicators, and improvement strategies, on which it will focus its use of available technical assistance, in order to impr ove its performance. We strongly encourage the State to access technical assistance related to those results elements and compliance indicators for which the State received a score of zero. Your State must report with its FFY 2019 SPP/APR submission, due F ebruary 1 , 2 021 , on: (1) the technical assistance sources from which the State received assistance; and (2) the actions the State took as a result of that technical assistance. As required by IDEA section 616(e)(7) and 34 C . F . R . § 303.706, your State must notify the public that the Secretary of Education has taken the above enforcement action, including, at a minimum, by posting a public notice on its website and distributing the notice to the media and to early intervention service ( EIS ) programs. States were required to submit Phase III Year Four of the SSIP by April 1 , 20 20 . OSEP appreciates the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. We hav e carefully reviewed and responded to your submission and will provide additional feedback in the upcoming weeks. Additionally, OSEP will continue to work with your State as it implements the fifth year of Phase III of the SSIP, which is due on April 1, 20 21 . As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State lead agency’s website, on the performance of each EIS program located in the State on the targets in the SPP/APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days a fter the State’s submission of its FFY 2018 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must: (1) review EIS program performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR; (2) determine if each EIS program “meets the requirements” of Part C, or “needs assistance,” “needs inte rvention,” or “needs substantial intervention” in implementing Part C of the IDEA ; (3) take appropriate enforcement action; and (4) inform each EIS program of its determination. Page 4 — Lead Agency Director Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the State lead agency’s website. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that: (1) includes the State’s determination letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments , and all State attachments that a re a ccessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ; and (2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website. OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families and looks forward to working with your State over the next year as we continue our important work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and their families. Please contact your OSEP State Lead if you have any questions, would like to discuss this further, or want to requ est technical assistance. Sincerely, Laurie VanderPloeg Director Office of Special Education Programs cc: State Part C Coordinator

View File

2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Indiana

State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61States are not required to report in their calculation the number of children for whom the State has identified the caFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.30%98.15%97.87%95.68%93.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,4781,74793.56%100%88.84%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if appliInclude your State's criteria for timely receipt of early intervention services (i.e., the time period from parent c4004FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2017 AnalyYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AFFY 2016404FFY 2015101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2016 AnalysData SourceData collected under section 618 of the IDEA (IDEA Part C Child Count and Settings data collection in the EFFY20132014201520162017Target>=95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%Data98.77%97.31%99.16%99.25%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=95.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assistSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs11,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%A151.70%Data53.91%53.88%55.88%53.56%56.23%A2208Target>=57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%A249.90%Data56.42%61.08%62.67%61.09%59.29%B12008Target>=55.00%55.00%56.0%56.00%56.00%B156.30%Data51.64%51.37%58.10%55.11%56.77%B22008Target>=72.00%72.00%72.00%7272.00%B268.50%Data71.91%73.54%76.20%74.50%73.06%C12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%C153.80%Data50.25%49.56%49.94%50.11%52.47%C22008Target>=67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%C261.70%Data66.55%67.71%68.16%66.57%64.4TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=57.00%57.00%Target B1>=57.00%57.00%Target B2>=72.00%72.00%Target C1>=55.00%55.00%Target C2>=67.00%67.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,586Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1907.35%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers96037.12%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56421.81%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s58.93%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning240.93%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1616.23%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers57522.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,30950.62%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1676.46%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers70227.15%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers98338.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide theNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - ReA. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helpe2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.0%98.00%99.00%A99.90%Data96.44%96.54%96.62%96.84%98.67%B2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.00%98.0B99.90%Data96.22%96.29%95.96%96.73%98.60%C2004Target>=95.00%95.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%C95.50%Data94.22%94.75%94.57%94.80%98.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=100.00%100.00%Target B>=100.00%100.00%Target C>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting 8,648Number of respondent families participating in Part C 5,233A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable The target of 100%, while ideal, is unrealistic. Indiana had a drop in family response rate during FFY18. The responseYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families Include the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions4 -1.40%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.56%1.56%1.56%1.57%1.57%Data1.22%1.27%1.36%1.33%1.42%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.57%1.57%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 180,539FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018None5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.83%3.83%3.83%3.84%3.84%Data3.64%3.79%3.89%4.09%4.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.84%3.84%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3247,301FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,323247,3014.09%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 Baseline200599.62%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.60%97.01%96.64%99.07%98.67%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,26312,20698.67%100%94.36%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide In Indiana, every child proceeding to evaluation/assessment receives a comprehensive developmental assessment by an As3012FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe state takes specific actions to assist clusters when they do not reachFFY 2016202FFY 2015312FFY 2014211FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedCluster G and I remOSEP cannot determine the number of findings the State identified and corrected the noncompliance in FFY 2017. The StaIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Targets must be 100%.Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.38%99.92%99.22%99.06%99.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)# of IFSPs Reviewed % of IFSPs with Transition Steps and2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedCluster B and G were able to c8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider corrected the findings of noncompAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quartCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required ActionsIndicator 8C: Early Childhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionHistorical DataBaseline200596.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.62%99.08%99.00%99.09%98.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS pro6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClusters A, B, G, H, I, and J 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider coIf the data reported in this indicator are not the same as the State's 618 data, explain.States are not required to reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting tHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional in9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SuperviSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agr0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting targets for the SPP/APR. These stakeholderFFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC erall State APR AttachmentsSubmitted on: 04/28/20 5:46:12 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC BED AcroExch.Document.DC EPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61States are not required to report in their calculation the number of children for whom the State has identified the caFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.30%98.15%97.87%95.68%93.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,4781,74793.56%100%88.84%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if appliInclude your State's criteria for timely receipt of early intervention services (i.e., the time period from parent c4004FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2017 AnalyYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AFFY 2016404FFY 2015101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2016 AnalysData SourceData collected under section 618 of the IDEA (IDEA Part C Child Count and Settings data collection in the EFFY20132014201520162017Target>=95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%Data98.77%97.31%99.16%99.25%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=95.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assistSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs11,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%A151.70%Data53.91%53.88%55.88%53.56%56.23%A2208Target>=57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%A249.90%Data56.42%61.08%62.67%61.09%59.29%B12008Target>=55.00%55.00%56.0%56.00%56.00%B156.30%Data51.64%51.37%58.10%55.11%56.77%B22008Target>=72.00%72.00%72.00%7272.00%B268.50%Data71.91%73.54%76.20%74.50%73.06%C12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%C153.80%Data50.25%49.56%49.94%50.11%52.47%C22008Target>=67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%C261.70%Data66.55%67.71%68.16%66.57%64.4TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=57.00%57.00%Target B1>=57.00%57.00%Target B2>=72.00%72.00%Target C1>=55.00%55.00%Target C2>=67.00%67.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,586Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1907.35%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers96037.12%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56421.81%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s58.93%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning240.93%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1616.23%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers57522.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,30950.62%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1676.46%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers70227.15%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers98338.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide theNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - ReA. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helpe2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.0%98.00%99.00%A99.90%Data96.44%96.54%96.62%96.84%98.67%B2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.00%98.0B99.90%Data96.22%96.29%95.96%96.73%98.60%C2004Target>=95.00%95.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%C95.50%Data94.22%94.75%94.57%94.80%98.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=100.00%100.00%Target B>=100.00%100.00%Target C>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting 8,648Number of respondent families participating in Part C 5,233A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable The target of 100%, while ideal, is unrealistic. Indiana had a drop in family response rate during FFY18. The responseYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families Include the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions4 -1.40%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.56%1.56%1.56%1.57%1.57%Data1.22%1.27%1.36%1.33%1.42%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.57%1.57%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 180,539FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018None5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.83%3.83%3.83%3.84%3.84%Data3.64%3.79%3.89%4.09%4.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.84%3.84%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3247,301FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,323247,3014.09%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 Baseline200599.62%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.60%97.01%96.64%99.07%98.67%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,26312,20698.67%100%94.36%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide In Indiana, every child proceeding to evaluation/assessment receives a comprehensive developmental assessment by an As3012FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe state takes specific actions to assist clusters when they do not reachFFY 2016202FFY 2015312FFY 2014211FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedCluster G and I remOSEP cannot determine the number of findings the State identified and corrected the noncompliance in FFY 2017. The StaIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Targets must be 100%.Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.38%99.92%99.22%99.06%99.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)# of IFSPs Reviewed % of IFSPs with Transition Steps and2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedCluster B and G were able to c8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider corrected the findings of noncompAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quartCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required ActionsIndicator 8C: Early Childhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionHistorical DataBaseline200596.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.62%99.08%99.00%99.09%98.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS pro6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClusters A, B, G, H, I, and J 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider coIf the data reported in this indicator are not the same as the State's 618 data, explain.States are not required to reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting tHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional in9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SuperviSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agr0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting targets for the SPP/APR. These stakeholderFFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC erall State APR AttachmentsSubmitted on: 04/28/20 5:46:12 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC BED AcroExch.Document.DC EPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61States are not required to report in their calculation the number of children for whom the State has identified the caFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.30%98.15%97.87%95.68%93.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,4781,74793.56%100%88.84%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if appliInclude your State's criteria for timely receipt of early intervention services (i.e., the time period from parent c4004FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2017 AnalyYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AFFY 2016404FFY 2015101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2016 AnalysData SourceData collected under section 618 of the IDEA (IDEA Part C Child Count and Settings data collection in the EFFY20132014201520162017Target>=95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%Data98.77%97.31%99.16%99.25%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=95.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assistSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs11,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%A151.70%Data53.91%53.88%55.88%53.56%56.23%A2208Target>=57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%A249.90%Data56.42%61.08%62.67%61.09%59.29%B12008Target>=55.00%55.00%56.0%56.00%56.00%B156.30%Data51.64%51.37%58.10%55.11%56.77%B22008Target>=72.00%72.00%72.00%7272.00%B268.50%Data71.91%73.54%76.20%74.50%73.06%C12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%C153.80%Data50.25%49.56%49.94%50.11%52.47%C22008Target>=67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%C261.70%Data66.55%67.71%68.16%66.57%64.4TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=57.00%57.00%Target B1>=57.00%57.00%Target B2>=72.00%72.00%Target C1>=55.00%55.00%Target C2>=67.00%67.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,586Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1907.35%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers96037.12%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56421.81%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s58.93%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning240.93%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1616.23%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers57522.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,30950.62%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1676.46%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers70227.15%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers98338.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide theNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - ReA. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helpe2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.0%98.00%99.00%A99.90%Data96.44%96.54%96.62%96.84%98.67%B2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.00%98.0B99.90%Data96.22%96.29%95.96%96.73%98.60%C2004Target>=95.00%95.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%C95.50%Data94.22%94.75%94.57%94.80%98.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=100.00%100.00%Target B>=100.00%100.00%Target C>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting 8,648Number of respondent families participating in Part C 5,233A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable The target of 100%, while ideal, is unrealistic. Indiana had a drop in family response rate during FFY18. The responseYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families Include the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions4 -1.40%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.56%1.56%1.56%1.57%1.57%Data1.22%1.27%1.36%1.33%1.42%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.57%1.57%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 180,539FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018None5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.83%3.83%3.83%3.84%3.84%Data3.64%3.79%3.89%4.09%4.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.84%3.84%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3247,301FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,323247,3014.09%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 Baseline200599.62%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.60%97.01%96.64%99.07%98.67%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,26312,20698.67%100%94.36%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide In Indiana, every child proceeding to evaluation/assessment receives a comprehensive developmental assessment by an As3012FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe state takes specific actions to assist clusters when they do not reachFFY 2016202FFY 2015312FFY 2014211FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedCluster G and I remOSEP cannot determine the number of findings the State identified and corrected the noncompliance in FFY 2017. The StaIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Targets must be 100%.Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.38%99.92%99.22%99.06%99.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)# of IFSPs Reviewed % of IFSPs with Transition Steps and2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedCluster B and G were able to c8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider corrected the findings of noncompAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quartCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required ActionsIndicator 8C: Early Childhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionHistorical DataBaseline200596.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.62%99.08%99.00%99.09%98.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS pro6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClusters A, B, G, H, I, and J 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider coIf the data reported in this indicator are not the same as the State's 618 data, explain.States are not required to reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting tHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional in9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SuperviSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agr0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting targets for the SPP/APR. These stakeholderFFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC erall State APR AttachmentsSubmitted on: 04/28/20 5:46:12 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC BED AcroExch.Document.DC EPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61States are not required to report in their calculation the number of children for whom the State has identified the caFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.30%98.15%97.87%95.68%93.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,4781,74793.56%100%88.84%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if appliInclude your State's criteria for timely receipt of early intervention services (i.e., the time period from parent c4004FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2017 AnalyYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AFFY 2016404FFY 2015101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2016 AnalysData SourceData collected under section 618 of the IDEA (IDEA Part C Child Count and Settings data collection in the EFFY20132014201520162017Target>=95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%Data98.77%97.31%99.16%99.25%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=95.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assistSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs11,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%A151.70%Data53.91%53.88%55.88%53.56%56.23%A2208Target>=57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%A249.90%Data56.42%61.08%62.67%61.09%59.29%B12008Target>=55.00%55.00%56.0%56.00%56.00%B156.30%Data51.64%51.37%58.10%55.11%56.77%B22008Target>=72.00%72.00%72.00%7272.00%B268.50%Data71.91%73.54%76.20%74.50%73.06%C12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%C153.80%Data50.25%49.56%49.94%50.11%52.47%C22008Target>=67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%C261.70%Data66.55%67.71%68.16%66.57%64.4TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=57.00%57.00%Target B1>=57.00%57.00%Target B2>=72.00%72.00%Target C1>=55.00%55.00%Target C2>=67.00%67.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,586Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1907.35%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers96037.12%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56421.81%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s58.93%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning240.93%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1616.23%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers57522.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,30950.62%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1676.46%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers70227.15%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers98338.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide theNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - ReA. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helpe2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.0%98.00%99.00%A99.90%Data96.44%96.54%96.62%96.84%98.67%B2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.00%98.0B99.90%Data96.22%96.29%95.96%96.73%98.60%C2004Target>=95.00%95.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%C95.50%Data94.22%94.75%94.57%94.80%98.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=100.00%100.00%Target B>=100.00%100.00%Target C>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting 8,648Number of respondent families participating in Part C 5,233A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable The target of 100%, while ideal, is unrealistic. Indiana had a drop in family response rate during FFY18. The responseYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families Include the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions4 -1.40%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.56%1.56%1.56%1.57%1.57%Data1.22%1.27%1.36%1.33%1.42%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.57%1.57%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 180,539FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018None5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.83%3.83%3.83%3.84%3.84%Data3.64%3.79%3.89%4.09%4.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.84%3.84%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3247,301FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,323247,3014.09%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 Baseline200599.62%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.60%97.01%96.64%99.07%98.67%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,26312,20698.67%100%94.36%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide In Indiana, every child proceeding to evaluation/assessment receives a comprehensive developmental assessment by an As3012FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe state takes specific actions to assist clusters when they do not reachFFY 2016202FFY 2015312FFY 2014211FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedCluster G and I remOSEP cannot determine the number of findings the State identified and corrected the noncompliance in FFY 2017. The StaIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Targets must be 100%.Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.38%99.92%99.22%99.06%99.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)# of IFSPs Reviewed % of IFSPs with Transition Steps and2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedCluster B and G were able to c8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider corrected the findings of noncompAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quartCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required ActionsIndicator 8C: Early Childhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionHistorical DataBaseline200596.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.62%99.08%99.00%99.09%98.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS pro6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClusters A, B, G, H, I, and J 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider coIf the data reported in this indicator are not the same as the State's 618 data, explain.States are not required to reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting tHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional in9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SuperviSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agr0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting targets for the SPP/APR. These stakeholderFFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC erall State APR AttachmentsSubmitted on: 04/28/20 5:46:12 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC BED AcroExch.Document.DC EPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61States are not required to report in their calculation the number of children for whom the State has identified the caFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.30%98.15%97.87%95.68%93.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,4781,74793.56%100%88.84%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if appliInclude your State's criteria for timely receipt of early intervention services (i.e., the time period from parent c4004FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2017 AnalyYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AFFY 2016404FFY 2015101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2016 AnalysData SourceData collected under section 618 of the IDEA (IDEA Part C Child Count and Settings data collection in the EFFY20132014201520162017Target>=95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%Data98.77%97.31%99.16%99.25%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=95.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assistSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs11,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%A151.70%Data53.91%53.88%55.88%53.56%56.23%A2208Target>=57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%A249.90%Data56.42%61.08%62.67%61.09%59.29%B12008Target>=55.00%55.00%56.0%56.00%56.00%B156.30%Data51.64%51.37%58.10%55.11%56.77%B22008Target>=72.00%72.00%72.00%7272.00%B268.50%Data71.91%73.54%76.20%74.50%73.06%C12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%C153.80%Data50.25%49.56%49.94%50.11%52.47%C22008Target>=67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%C261.70%Data66.55%67.71%68.16%66.57%64.4TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=57.00%57.00%Target B1>=57.00%57.00%Target B2>=72.00%72.00%Target C1>=55.00%55.00%Target C2>=67.00%67.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,586Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1907.35%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers96037.12%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56421.81%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s58.93%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning240.93%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1616.23%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers57522.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,30950.62%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1676.46%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers70227.15%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers98338.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide theNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - ReA. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helpe2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.0%98.00%99.00%A99.90%Data96.44%96.54%96.62%96.84%98.67%B2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.00%98.0B99.90%Data96.22%96.29%95.96%96.73%98.60%C2004Target>=95.00%95.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%C95.50%Data94.22%94.75%94.57%94.80%98.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=100.00%100.00%Target B>=100.00%100.00%Target C>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting 8,648Number of respondent families participating in Part C 5,233A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable The target of 100%, while ideal, is unrealistic. Indiana had a drop in family response rate during FFY18. The responseYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families Include the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions4 -1.40%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.56%1.56%1.56%1.57%1.57%Data1.22%1.27%1.36%1.33%1.42%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.57%1.57%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 180,539FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018None5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.83%3.83%3.83%3.84%3.84%Data3.64%3.79%3.89%4.09%4.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.84%3.84%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3247,301FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,323247,3014.09%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 Baseline200599.62%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.60%97.01%96.64%99.07%98.67%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,26312,20698.67%100%94.36%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide In Indiana, every child proceeding to evaluation/assessment receives a comprehensive developmental assessment by an As3012FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe state takes specific actions to assist clusters when they do not reachFFY 2016202FFY 2015312FFY 2014211FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedCluster G and I remOSEP cannot determine the number of findings the State identified and corrected the noncompliance in FFY 2017. The StaIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Targets must be 100%.Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.38%99.92%99.22%99.06%99.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)# of IFSPs Reviewed % of IFSPs with Transition Steps and2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedCluster B and G were able to c8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider corrected the findings of noncompAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quartCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required ActionsIndicator 8C: Early Childhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionHistorical DataBaseline200596.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.62%99.08%99.00%99.09%98.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS pro6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClusters A, B, G, H, I, and J 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider coIf the data reported in this indicator are not the same as the State's 618 data, explain.States are not required to reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting tHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional in9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SuperviSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agr0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting targets for the SPP/APR. These stakeholderFFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC erall State APR AttachmentsSubmitted on: 04/28/20 5:46:12 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC BED AcroExch.Document.DC EPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseThe State's determinations for both 2018 and 2019 were Needs Assistance. Pursuant to sections 61States are not required to report in their calculation the number of children for whom the State has identified the caFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.30%98.15%97.87%95.68%93.56%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,4781,74793.56%100%88.84%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide reasons for slippage, if appliInclude your State's criteria for timely receipt of early intervention services (i.e., the time period from parent c4004FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2017 AnalyYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 AFFY 2016404FFY 2015101FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not corrected2016 AnalysData SourceData collected under section 618 of the IDEA (IDEA Part C Child Count and Settings data collection in the EFFY20132014201520162017Target>=95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%95.00%Data98.77%97.31%99.16%99.25%95.83%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=95.00%95.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assistSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs11,Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017A12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%A151.70%Data53.91%53.88%55.88%53.56%56.23%A2208Target>=57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%57.00%A249.90%Data56.42%61.08%62.67%61.09%59.29%B12008Target>=55.00%55.00%56.0%56.00%56.00%B156.30%Data51.64%51.37%58.10%55.11%56.77%B22008Target>=72.00%72.00%72.00%7272.00%B268.50%Data71.91%73.54%76.20%74.50%73.06%C12008Target>=55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%55.00%C153.80%Data50.25%49.56%49.94%50.11%52.47%C22008Target>=67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%67.00%C261.70%Data66.55%67.71%68.16%66.57%64.4TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=55.00%55.00%Target A2>=57.00%57.00%Target B1>=57.00%57.00%Target B2>=72.00%72.00%Target C1>=55.00%55.00%Target C2>=67.00%67.00% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed2,586Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skila. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1907.35%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers96037.12%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers56421.81%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s58.93%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning240.93%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1616.23%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers57522.24%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers1,30950.62%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BOutcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsNumber of ChildrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning301.16%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1676.46%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers70227.15%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers98338.01%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)NOProvide theNone3 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - ReA. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helpe2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.0%98.00%99.00%A99.90%Data96.44%96.54%96.62%96.84%98.67%B2004Target>=97.00%97.00%97.00%98.0B99.90%Data96.22%96.29%95.96%96.73%98.60%C2004Target>=95.00%95.00%96.00%96.00%96.00%C95.50%Data94.22%94.75%94.57%94.80%98.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=100.00%100.00%Target B>=100.00%100.00%Target C>=96.00%96.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting 8,648Number of respondent families participating in Part C 5,233A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpProvide reasons for part A slippage, if applicable The target of 100%, while ideal, is unrealistic. Indiana had a drop in family response rate during FFY18. The responseYESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families Include the State's analysis of the extent to which the demographics of the families responding are representative of The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets. 4 - Required Actions4 -1.40%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.56%1.56%1.56%1.57%1.57%Data1.22%1.27%1.36%1.33%1.42%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.57%1.57%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 180,539FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPsPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018None5 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 5 FFY20132014201520162017Target >=3.83%3.83%3.83%3.84%3.84%Data3.64%3.79%3.89%4.09%4.09%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=3.84%3.84%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Indiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist iPrepopulated DataSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3247,301FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,323247,3014.09%None6 - OSEP ResponseThe State provided a target for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts that target. 6 Baseline200599.62%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data97.60%97.01%96.64%99.07%98.67%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage11,26312,20698.67%100%94.36%Did Not Meet TargetSlippageProvide In Indiana, every child proceeding to evaluation/assessment receives a comprehensive developmental assessment by an As3012FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianActions taken if noncompliance not correctedThe state takes specific actions to assist clusters when they do not reachFFY 2016202FFY 2015312FFY 2014211FFY 2016Findings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as CorrectedActions taken if noncompliance not correctedCluster G and I remOSEP cannot determine the number of findings the State identified and corrected the noncompliance in FFY 2017. The StaIndicators 8A, 8B, and 8C: Targets must be 100%.Describe the results of the calculations and compare the results to thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data99.38%99.92%99.22%99.06%99.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitProvide additional information about this indicator (optional)# of IFSPs Reviewed % of IFSPs with Transition Steps and2200FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedCluster B and G were able to c8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider corrected the findings of noncompAccount for untimely transition planning under 8A, 8B, and 8C, including the reasons for delays.InstructionsIndicatorsFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prState databaseProvide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quartCorrection of Findings of Noncompliance Identified Prior to FFY 2017Year Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP Response8B - Required ActionsIndicator 8C: Early Childhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisionHistorical DataBaseline200596.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data98.62%99.08%99.00%99.09%98.01%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at What is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State monitoringDescribe the method used to select EIS pro6600FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedClusters A, B, G, H, I, and J 8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State did not demonstrate that the EIS program or provider coIf the data reported in this indicator are not the same as the State's 618 data, explain.States are not required to reSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1 Number of resolSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section C: Due Process Complaints11/11/20193.1(a) Number resolTargets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting tHistorical DataBaselineFFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data3.1(a) Number resolutions sessions resolved through settlement agreements3.1 Number of resolutions sessionsFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage00N/AN/AProvide additional in9 - Required ActionsIndicator 10: MediationInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SuperviSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agr0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputIndiana First Steps used a broad group of stakeholders to assist in setting targets for the SPP/APR. These stakeholderFFY20132014201520162017Target>=Data0.00%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 Temic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC erall State APR AttachmentsSubmitted on: 04/28/20 5:46:12 PMED Attachments EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC BED AcroExch.Document.DC EPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part C

(Grant Year 2018–2019 — Issued June 23, 2020)
How the department made determinations

Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Last modified on September 15, 2020

2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Indiana

About IDEA

Subscribe for Updates

About IDEA

Subscribe for Updates

Connect with Us