2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Arizona - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

OSEP Response to SPP/APR

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 - 2600 www.ed.gov The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION O FFICE OF S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R EHABILITATIVE S ERVICES June 23, 20 20 Honorable Michael Wisehart D irector Arizona Department of Economic Security 1789 West Jefferson Street, Mail Drop 1111 Phoenix , Arizona 85007 Dear Director Wisehart : I am writing to advise you of the U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) 2020 determination under sections 616 an d 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Department has determined that Arizona meets the requirements and purposes of Part C of the IDEA. This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data and information, includin g the Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State - reported data, and other publicly available information. Your State’s 2020 determination is based on the data reflected in the State’s “ 2020 Part C Results - Driven Accountability Matri x” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for each State and consists of: (1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other compliance factors; (2) Results Components and Appendices that include scoring on Results Elements; (3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score; (4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Complia nce Score and the Results Score; and (5) the State’s Determination. The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made Determinations under Sections 616(d) and 642 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 2020 : P art C” (HTDMD). The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is continuing to use both results data and compliance data in making the Department’s determinations in 2020 , as it did for Part C determinations in 2015, 2016, 201 7 , 2018, and 201 9 . (The spec ifics of the determination procedures and criteria are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your State.) For 2020 , the Department’s IDEA Part C determinations continue to include consideration of each State’s Child Outcomes data, whic h measure how children who receive Part C services are improving functioning in three outcome areas that are critical to school readiness: Page 2 — Lead Agency Director • p ositive social - emotional skills; • acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicati on); and • use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs . Specifically, the Department considered the data quality and the child performance levels in each State’s Child Outcomes FFY 2018 data . You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your State’ s SPP/APR and other relevant data by accessing the EMAPS SPP/APR reporting tool using your State - specific log - on information at https://emaps.ed.gov/suite/ . When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find, in Indicators 1 through 10, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is required to take. The actions that the State is required to take are in two places: (1) actions related to the correction of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP Response” section of the indicator; and (2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Actions” section of the indicator. It is important for you to review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include language in the “OSEP Response” and/or “Required Actions” sections. You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments: (1) the State’s RDA Matrix; (2) the HTDMD document; (3) a spreadsheet entitled “ 2020 Data Rubric Part C,” which shows how OSEP calculated the State’s “Timely and Accurate State - Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and (4) a document entitled “Dispute Resolution 201 8 - 20 1 9 ,” which includes the IDEA section 6 18 data that OSEP used to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and “Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix. As noted above, the State’s 20 20 determination is Meets Requirements. A State’s 20 20 RDA Determi nation is Meets Requirements if the RDA Percentage is at least 80%, unless the Department has imposed Special or Specific Conditions on the State’s last three IDEA Part C grant awards (for FFYs 201 7 , 201 8 , and 201 9 ), and those Speci fic Conditions are in ef fect at the time of the 20 20 determination. States were required to submit Phase III Year Four of the SSIP by April 1 , 20 20 . OSEP appreciates the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. We have carefully reviewed and responded to your submission and will provide additional feedback in the upcoming weeks. Additionally, OSEP will continue to work with your State as it implements the fifth year of Phase III of the SSIP, which is due on April 1, 20 21 . As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State lead agency’s website, on the performance of each early intervention service ( EIS ) program located in the State on the targets in the SPP/ APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days after the State’s submission of its FFY 2018 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must: Page 3 — Lead Agency Director (1) review EIS program performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR; (2) determine if each EIS program “meets the requirements” of Part C, or “needs assistance,” “needs intervention,” or “needs substantial intervention” in implementing Part C of the IDEA ; (3) take appropriate enforcement action; and (4) inform each EIS program of its determination. Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the State lead agency’s website. Within the upcoming weeks , OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that: (1) includes the State’s determination letter and SPP/APR, OSEP attachments , and all State attachments that are accessible in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ; and (2) will be accessible to the public via the ed.gov website . OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to improve results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families and looks forward to working with your State over the n ext year as we continue our important work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and their families. Please contact your OSEP State Lead if you have any questions, would like to discuss this further, or want to request technical assistance. Sincerely, Laurie VanderPloeg Director Office of Special Education Programs cc: State Part C Coordinator

View File

2020 SPP/APR Submission PART C — Arizona

State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III Year Four of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200548.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data82.19%74.83%84.96%86.64%91.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage49357191.95%100%92.47%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributablData represent 571 IFSPs, all with either an initial Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) or a subsequent IFSP 9720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, Baseline200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=89.00%90.00%91.00%92.00%93.00%Data94.67%98.21%97.96%97.62%98.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=94.50%97.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputThe FFY 2018 SPP/APR was developed with extensive stakeholder engDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or c07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs5,980FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12014Target>=65.00%65.00%72.01%72.01%72.01%A172.01%Data71.73%72.01%72.48%72.31%70.86%A22014Target>=58.00%58.00%53.25%53.25%53.25%A253.25%Data55.36%53.25%53.71%53.84%56.17%B12014Target>=73.00%73.00%77.61%77.61%77.61%B177.61%Data74.70%77.61%76.65%77.29%76.44%B22014Target>=50.50%50.50%53.75%53.75%B253.75%Data54.71%53.75%53.78%55.74%56.56%C12014Target>=73.00%73.00%76.81%76.81%76.81%C176.81%Data75.90%76.81%78.71%77.15%77.11%C22014Target>=50.50%50.50%47.21%47.21%47.21%C247.21%Data53.58%47.21%47.64%48.51%48.89%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=72.74%72.74%Target A2>=53.98%53.98%Target B1>=78.26%78.26%Target B2>=54.48%54.48%Target C1>=77.45%77.45%Target C2>=47.94%47.94% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed4,33Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning410.99%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but notc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it86921.08%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,37733.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers92422.42%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s55.82%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning270.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it92222.37%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,65940.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65615.91%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThe Lead Agency has been implementing infrastructure improvements as a pa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning320.78%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1,23229.89%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,58638.48%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers44610.82%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequiSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%A94.0%Data97.50%95.37%90.74%94.39%94.42%B2006Target>=93.50%93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%B95.00%Data95.01%94.34%93.55%92.41%91.86%C2006Target>=93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%95.50%C96.00%Data98.40%95.72%93.41%95.40%95.15%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=94.50%94.50%Target B>=95.50%95.50%Target C>=96.25%96.25%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input The Lead Agency has relied heavily on the specific Stakeholder Input from th5,713Number of respondent families participating in Part C 908A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representat The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIn the20050.59%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.64%0.65%0.66%0.67%0.68%Data0.76%0.89%0.89%0.95%0.91%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.69%0.73%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November the Lead Agency's annual stakeholder meeting followsSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 183,553FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage76783,5530.91%0.69Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The State continues to see a significant number of child20051.61%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.87%1.87%1.88%1.88%1.89%Data1.94%2.09%2.09%2.10%2.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.89%1.95%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November, the regularly scheduled ICC meeting includes the LeSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3255,977FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage5,980255,9772.22%1Compare your results to the national dataArizona is the 14th most populous state in terms of children, birth to age thInstructionsIf data are from State monitoring, describe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. If dataFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data75.85%88.61%91.21%95.34%97.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,57697.58%100%98.41%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The data represent 1,576 individual children, all with i191720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repordhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data56.69%79.37%82.14%93.44%94.96%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitThe data reflect all children, potentially eligible for Part B and exiting between April 1, 2019 through June 30, 20198530FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data69.57%86.31%83.47%72.41%81.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prYESWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaBased on findings of noncompliance, EIPs were placed on a corrective action plan. EIP leaders were required to work ac8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data70.34%80.85%77.52%88.81%90.24%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at Provide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection 10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 T10 - Required ActionsIndicator 11: State Systemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Overall State APR Title: Part C CoordinatorEmail: jsisnroy@azdes.govPhone: 602-532-9960Submitted on: 04/28/20 11:50:09 PMED AttachmentsPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III Year Four of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200548.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data82.19%74.83%84.96%86.64%91.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage49357191.95%100%92.47%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributablData represent 571 IFSPs, all with either an initial Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) or a subsequent IFSP 9720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, Baseline200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=89.00%90.00%91.00%92.00%93.00%Data94.67%98.21%97.96%97.62%98.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=94.50%97.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputThe FFY 2018 SPP/APR was developed with extensive stakeholder engDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or c07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs5,980FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12014Target>=65.00%65.00%72.01%72.01%72.01%A172.01%Data71.73%72.01%72.48%72.31%70.86%A22014Target>=58.00%58.00%53.25%53.25%53.25%A253.25%Data55.36%53.25%53.71%53.84%56.17%B12014Target>=73.00%73.00%77.61%77.61%77.61%B177.61%Data74.70%77.61%76.65%77.29%76.44%B22014Target>=50.50%50.50%53.75%53.75%B253.75%Data54.71%53.75%53.78%55.74%56.56%C12014Target>=73.00%73.00%76.81%76.81%76.81%C176.81%Data75.90%76.81%78.71%77.15%77.11%C22014Target>=50.50%50.50%47.21%47.21%47.21%C247.21%Data53.58%47.21%47.64%48.51%48.89%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=72.74%72.74%Target A2>=53.98%53.98%Target B1>=78.26%78.26%Target B2>=54.48%54.48%Target C1>=77.45%77.45%Target C2>=47.94%47.94% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed4,33Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning410.99%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but notc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it86921.08%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,37733.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers92422.42%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s55.82%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning270.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it92222.37%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,65940.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65615.91%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThe Lead Agency has been implementing infrastructure improvements as a pa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning320.78%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1,23229.89%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,58638.48%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers44610.82%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequiSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%A94.0%Data97.50%95.37%90.74%94.39%94.42%B2006Target>=93.50%93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%B95.00%Data95.01%94.34%93.55%92.41%91.86%C2006Target>=93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%95.50%C96.00%Data98.40%95.72%93.41%95.40%95.15%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=94.50%94.50%Target B>=95.50%95.50%Target C>=96.25%96.25%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input The Lead Agency has relied heavily on the specific Stakeholder Input from th5,713Number of respondent families participating in Part C 908A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representat The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIn the20050.59%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.64%0.65%0.66%0.67%0.68%Data0.76%0.89%0.89%0.95%0.91%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.69%0.73%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November the Lead Agency's annual stakeholder meeting followsSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 183,553FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage76783,5530.91%0.69Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The State continues to see a significant number of child20051.61%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.87%1.87%1.88%1.88%1.89%Data1.94%2.09%2.09%2.10%2.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.89%1.95%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November, the regularly scheduled ICC meeting includes the LeSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3255,977FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage5,980255,9772.22%1Compare your results to the national dataArizona is the 14th most populous state in terms of children, birth to age thInstructionsIf data are from State monitoring, describe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. If dataFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data75.85%88.61%91.21%95.34%97.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,57697.58%100%98.41%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The data represent 1,576 individual children, all with i191720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repordhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data56.69%79.37%82.14%93.44%94.96%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitThe data reflect all children, potentially eligible for Part B and exiting between April 1, 2019 through June 30, 20198530FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data69.57%86.31%83.47%72.41%81.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prYESWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaBased on findings of noncompliance, EIPs were placed on a corrective action plan. EIP leaders were required to work ac8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data70.34%80.85%77.52%88.81%90.24%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at Provide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection 10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 T10 - Required ActionsIndicator 11: State Systemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Overall State APR Title: Part C CoordinatorEmail: jsisnroy@azdes.govPhone: 602-532-9960Submitted on: 04/28/20 11:50:09 PMED AttachmentsPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III Year Four of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200548.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data82.19%74.83%84.96%86.64%91.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage49357191.95%100%92.47%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributablData represent 571 IFSPs, all with either an initial Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) or a subsequent IFSP 9720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, Baseline200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=89.00%90.00%91.00%92.00%93.00%Data94.67%98.21%97.96%97.62%98.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=94.50%97.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputThe FFY 2018 SPP/APR was developed with extensive stakeholder engDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or c07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs5,980FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12014Target>=65.00%65.00%72.01%72.01%72.01%A172.01%Data71.73%72.01%72.48%72.31%70.86%A22014Target>=58.00%58.00%53.25%53.25%53.25%A253.25%Data55.36%53.25%53.71%53.84%56.17%B12014Target>=73.00%73.00%77.61%77.61%77.61%B177.61%Data74.70%77.61%76.65%77.29%76.44%B22014Target>=50.50%50.50%53.75%53.75%B253.75%Data54.71%53.75%53.78%55.74%56.56%C12014Target>=73.00%73.00%76.81%76.81%76.81%C176.81%Data75.90%76.81%78.71%77.15%77.11%C22014Target>=50.50%50.50%47.21%47.21%47.21%C247.21%Data53.58%47.21%47.64%48.51%48.89%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=72.74%72.74%Target A2>=53.98%53.98%Target B1>=78.26%78.26%Target B2>=54.48%54.48%Target C1>=77.45%77.45%Target C2>=47.94%47.94% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed4,33Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning410.99%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but notc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it86921.08%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,37733.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers92422.42%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s55.82%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning270.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it92222.37%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,65940.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65615.91%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThe Lead Agency has been implementing infrastructure improvements as a pa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning320.78%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1,23229.89%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,58638.48%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers44610.82%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequiSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%A94.0%Data97.50%95.37%90.74%94.39%94.42%B2006Target>=93.50%93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%B95.00%Data95.01%94.34%93.55%92.41%91.86%C2006Target>=93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%95.50%C96.00%Data98.40%95.72%93.41%95.40%95.15%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=94.50%94.50%Target B>=95.50%95.50%Target C>=96.25%96.25%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input The Lead Agency has relied heavily on the specific Stakeholder Input from th5,713Number of respondent families participating in Part C 908A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representat The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIn the20050.59%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.64%0.65%0.66%0.67%0.68%Data0.76%0.89%0.89%0.95%0.91%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.69%0.73%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November the Lead Agency's annual stakeholder meeting followsSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 183,553FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage76783,5530.91%0.69Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The State continues to see a significant number of child20051.61%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.87%1.87%1.88%1.88%1.89%Data1.94%2.09%2.09%2.10%2.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.89%1.95%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November, the regularly scheduled ICC meeting includes the LeSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3255,977FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage5,980255,9772.22%1Compare your results to the national dataArizona is the 14th most populous state in terms of children, birth to age thInstructionsIf data are from State monitoring, describe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. If dataFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data75.85%88.61%91.21%95.34%97.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,57697.58%100%98.41%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The data represent 1,576 individual children, all with i191720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repordhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data56.69%79.37%82.14%93.44%94.96%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitThe data reflect all children, potentially eligible for Part B and exiting between April 1, 2019 through June 30, 20198530FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data69.57%86.31%83.47%72.41%81.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prYESWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaBased on findings of noncompliance, EIPs were placed on a corrective action plan. EIP leaders were required to work ac8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data70.34%80.85%77.52%88.81%90.24%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at Provide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection 10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 T10 - Required ActionsIndicator 11: State Systemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Overall State APR Title: Part C CoordinatorEmail: jsisnroy@azdes.govPhone: 602-532-9960Submitted on: 04/28/20 11:50:09 PMED AttachmentsPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III Year Four of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200548.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data82.19%74.83%84.96%86.64%91.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage49357191.95%100%92.47%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributablData represent 571 IFSPs, all with either an initial Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) or a subsequent IFSP 9720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, Baseline200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=89.00%90.00%91.00%92.00%93.00%Data94.67%98.21%97.96%97.62%98.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=94.50%97.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputThe FFY 2018 SPP/APR was developed with extensive stakeholder engDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or c07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs5,980FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12014Target>=65.00%65.00%72.01%72.01%72.01%A172.01%Data71.73%72.01%72.48%72.31%70.86%A22014Target>=58.00%58.00%53.25%53.25%53.25%A253.25%Data55.36%53.25%53.71%53.84%56.17%B12014Target>=73.00%73.00%77.61%77.61%77.61%B177.61%Data74.70%77.61%76.65%77.29%76.44%B22014Target>=50.50%50.50%53.75%53.75%B253.75%Data54.71%53.75%53.78%55.74%56.56%C12014Target>=73.00%73.00%76.81%76.81%76.81%C176.81%Data75.90%76.81%78.71%77.15%77.11%C22014Target>=50.50%50.50%47.21%47.21%47.21%C247.21%Data53.58%47.21%47.64%48.51%48.89%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=72.74%72.74%Target A2>=53.98%53.98%Target B1>=78.26%78.26%Target B2>=54.48%54.48%Target C1>=77.45%77.45%Target C2>=47.94%47.94% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed4,33Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning410.99%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but notc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it86921.08%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,37733.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers92422.42%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s55.82%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning270.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it92222.37%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,65940.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65615.91%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThe Lead Agency has been implementing infrastructure improvements as a pa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning320.78%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1,23229.89%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,58638.48%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers44610.82%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequiSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%A94.0%Data97.50%95.37%90.74%94.39%94.42%B2006Target>=93.50%93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%B95.00%Data95.01%94.34%93.55%92.41%91.86%C2006Target>=93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%95.50%C96.00%Data98.40%95.72%93.41%95.40%95.15%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=94.50%94.50%Target B>=95.50%95.50%Target C>=96.25%96.25%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input The Lead Agency has relied heavily on the specific Stakeholder Input from th5,713Number of respondent families participating in Part C 908A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representat The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIn the20050.59%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.64%0.65%0.66%0.67%0.68%Data0.76%0.89%0.89%0.95%0.91%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.69%0.73%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November the Lead Agency's annual stakeholder meeting followsSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 183,553FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage76783,5530.91%0.69Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The State continues to see a significant number of child20051.61%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.87%1.87%1.88%1.88%1.89%Data1.94%2.09%2.09%2.10%2.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.89%1.95%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November, the regularly scheduled ICC meeting includes the LeSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3255,977FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage5,980255,9772.22%1Compare your results to the national dataArizona is the 14th most populous state in terms of children, birth to age thInstructionsIf data are from State monitoring, describe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. If dataFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data75.85%88.61%91.21%95.34%97.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,57697.58%100%98.41%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The data represent 1,576 individual children, all with i191720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repordhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data56.69%79.37%82.14%93.44%94.96%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitThe data reflect all children, potentially eligible for Part B and exiting between April 1, 2019 through June 30, 20198530FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data69.57%86.31%83.47%72.41%81.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prYESWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaBased on findings of noncompliance, EIPs were placed on a corrective action plan. EIP leaders were required to work ac8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data70.34%80.85%77.52%88.81%90.24%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at Provide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection 10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 T10 - Required ActionsIndicator 11: State Systemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Overall State APR Title: Part C CoordinatorEmail: jsisnroy@azdes.govPhone: 602-532-9960Submitted on: 04/28/20 11:50:09 PMED AttachmentsPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III Year Four of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200548.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data82.19%74.83%84.96%86.64%91.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage49357191.95%100%92.47%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributablData represent 571 IFSPs, all with either an initial Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) or a subsequent IFSP 9720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, Baseline200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=89.00%90.00%91.00%92.00%93.00%Data94.67%98.21%97.96%97.62%98.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=94.50%97.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputThe FFY 2018 SPP/APR was developed with extensive stakeholder engDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or c07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs5,980FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12014Target>=65.00%65.00%72.01%72.01%72.01%A172.01%Data71.73%72.01%72.48%72.31%70.86%A22014Target>=58.00%58.00%53.25%53.25%53.25%A253.25%Data55.36%53.25%53.71%53.84%56.17%B12014Target>=73.00%73.00%77.61%77.61%77.61%B177.61%Data74.70%77.61%76.65%77.29%76.44%B22014Target>=50.50%50.50%53.75%53.75%B253.75%Data54.71%53.75%53.78%55.74%56.56%C12014Target>=73.00%73.00%76.81%76.81%76.81%C176.81%Data75.90%76.81%78.71%77.15%77.11%C22014Target>=50.50%50.50%47.21%47.21%47.21%C247.21%Data53.58%47.21%47.64%48.51%48.89%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=72.74%72.74%Target A2>=53.98%53.98%Target B1>=78.26%78.26%Target B2>=54.48%54.48%Target C1>=77.45%77.45%Target C2>=47.94%47.94% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed4,33Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning410.99%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but notc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it86921.08%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,37733.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers92422.42%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s55.82%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning270.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it92222.37%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,65940.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65615.91%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThe Lead Agency has been implementing infrastructure improvements as a pa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning320.78%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1,23229.89%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,58638.48%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers44610.82%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequiSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%A94.0%Data97.50%95.37%90.74%94.39%94.42%B2006Target>=93.50%93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%B95.00%Data95.01%94.34%93.55%92.41%91.86%C2006Target>=93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%95.50%C96.00%Data98.40%95.72%93.41%95.40%95.15%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=94.50%94.50%Target B>=95.50%95.50%Target C>=96.25%96.25%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input The Lead Agency has relied heavily on the specific Stakeholder Input from th5,713Number of respondent families participating in Part C 908A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representat The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIn the20050.59%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.64%0.65%0.66%0.67%0.68%Data0.76%0.89%0.89%0.95%0.91%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.69%0.73%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November the Lead Agency's annual stakeholder meeting followsSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 183,553FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage76783,5530.91%0.69Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The State continues to see a significant number of child20051.61%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.87%1.87%1.88%1.88%1.89%Data1.94%2.09%2.09%2.10%2.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.89%1.95%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November, the regularly scheduled ICC meeting includes the LeSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3255,977FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage5,980255,9772.22%1Compare your results to the national dataArizona is the 14th most populous state in terms of children, birth to age thInstructionsIf data are from State monitoring, describe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. If dataFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data75.85%88.61%91.21%95.34%97.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,57697.58%100%98.41%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The data represent 1,576 individual children, all with i191720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repordhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data56.69%79.37%82.14%93.44%94.96%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitThe data reflect all children, potentially eligible for Part B and exiting between April 1, 2019 through June 30, 20198530FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data69.57%86.31%83.47%72.41%81.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prYESWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaBased on findings of noncompliance, EIPs were placed on a corrective action plan. EIP leaders were required to work ac8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data70.34%80.85%77.52%88.81%90.24%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at Provide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection 10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 T10 - Required ActionsIndicator 11: State Systemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Overall State APR Title: Part C CoordinatorEmail: jsisnroy@azdes.govPhone: 602-532-9960Submitted on: 04/28/20 11:50:09 PMED AttachmentsPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part CState Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report:Part CforSTATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMSunder theIndividuals with DisaInstructionsProvide sufficient detail to ensure that the Secretary and the public are informed of and understand the SIntro - OSEP ResponseStates were instructed to submit Phase III Year Four of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP1 - Indicator DataHistorical DataBaseline200548.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data82.19%74.83%84.96%86.64%91.95%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the early intervention services on FFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage49357191.95%100%92.47%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber of documented delays attributablData represent 571 IFSPs, all with either an initial Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) or a subsequent IFSP 9720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A1 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone1 - OSEP ResponseBecause the State reported less than 100% compliance for FFY 2018, Baseline200586.00%FFY20132014201520162017Target>=89.00%90.00%91.00%92.00%93.00%Data94.67%98.21%97.96%97.62%98.03%TargetsFFY20182019Target>=94.50%97.00%Targets: Description of Stakeholder InputThe FFY 2018 SPP/APR was developed with extensive stakeholder engDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or c07/10/2019Total number of infants and toddlers with IFSPs5,980FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily receive early intervention services in the home or community-b2 - Required ActionsIndicator 3: Early Childhood OutcomesInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Early Interd. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of inBaselineFFY2013201420152016217A12014Target>=65.00%65.00%72.01%72.01%72.01%A172.01%Data71.73%72.01%72.48%72.31%70.86%A22014Target>=58.00%58.00%53.25%53.25%53.25%A253.25%Data55.36%53.25%53.71%53.84%56.17%B12014Target>=73.00%73.00%77.61%77.61%77.61%B177.61%Data74.70%77.61%76.65%77.29%76.44%B22014Target>=50.50%50.50%53.75%53.75%B253.75%Data54.71%53.75%53.78%55.74%56.56%C12014Target>=73.00%73.00%76.81%76.81%76.81%C176.81%Data75.90%76.81%78.71%77.15%77.11%C22014Target>=50.50%50.50%47.21%47.21%47.21%C247.21%Data53.58%47.21%47.64%48.51%48.89%TargetsFFY20182019Target A1>=72.74%72.74%Target A2>=53.98%53.98%Target B1>=78.26%78.26%Target B2>=54.48%54.48%Target C1>=77.45%77.45%Target C2>=47.94%47.94% FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers with IFSPs assessed4,33Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)Number of childrenPercentage of Totala. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning410.99%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but notc. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it86921.08%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,37733.41%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers92422.42%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who s55.82%Met TargetNo SlippageOutcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communicata. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning270.66%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it92222.37%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,65940.25%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers65615.91%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageB1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome BProvide reasons for B1 slippage, if applicableThe Lead Agency has been implementing infrastructure improvements as a pa. Infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning320.78%b. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-ac. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it1,23229.89%d. Infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers1,58638.48%e. Infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers44610.82%NumeratorDenominatorFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageC1. Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome CNo SlippageThe number of infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months The number of those infants and toddlers who did not receive early intervention services for at least six months beforDid you use the Early Childhood Outcomes Center (ECO) Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) process? (yes/no)YESList the i3 - OSEP Response The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.3 - RequiSampling offamilies participating in Part Cis allowed. When sampling is used, submit a description of the sampling m94.00%94.00%94.00%94.00%A94.0%Data97.50%95.37%90.74%94.39%94.42%B2006Target>=93.50%93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%B95.00%Data95.01%94.34%93.55%92.41%91.86%C2006Target>=93.50%94.00%94.50%95.00%95.50%C96.00%Data98.40%95.72%93.41%95.40%95.15%TargetsFFY20182019Target A>=94.50%94.50%Target B>=95.50%95.50%Target C>=96.25%96.25%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input The Lead Agency has relied heavily on the specific Stakeholder Input from th5,713Number of respondent families participating in Part C 908A1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the A2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family know their rightB1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the B2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family effectively commC1. Number of respondent families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the C2. Number of responses to the question of whether early intervention services have helped the family help their childFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippageA. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family knowB. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effeC. Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family helpWas sampling used? NOWas a collection tool used?YESIf yes, is it a new or revised collection tool? NOThe demographics of the families responding are representative of the demographics of infants, toddlers, and families If not, describe the strategies that the State will use to ensure that in the future the response data are representat The State provided targets for FFY 2019 for this indicator, and OSEP accepts those targets.4 - Required ActionsIn the20050.59%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=0.64%0.65%0.66%0.67%0.68%Data0.76%0.89%0.89%0.95%0.91%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=0.69%0.73%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November the Lead Agency's annual stakeholder meeting followsSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 183,553FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 1 withPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 1FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage76783,5530.91%0.69Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The State continues to see a significant number of child20051.61%FFY20132014201520162017Target >=1.87%1.87%1.88%1.88%1.89%Data1.94%2.09%2.09%2.10%2.22%TargetsFFY20182019Target >=1.89%1.95%Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Each November, the regularly scheduled ICC meeting includes the LeSourceDateDescriptionDataSY 2018-19 Child Count/Educational Environment Data Groups07/10/2019Number of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3255,977FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of infants and toddlers birth to 3 witPopulation of infants and toddlers birth to 3FFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage5,980255,9772.22%1Compare your results to the national dataArizona is the 14th most populous state in terms of children, birth to age thInstructionsIf data are from State monitoring, describe the method used to select EIS programs for monitoring. If dataFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data75.85%88.61%91.21%95.34%97.58%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataNumber of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom an initial evaluation and assFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 TargetFFY 2018 DataStatusSlippage1,0501,57697.58%100%98.41%Did Not Meet TargetNo SlippageNumber Provide additional information about this indicator (optional)The data represent 1,576 individual children, all with i191720FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncomplianYear Findings of Noncompliance Were IdentifiedFindings of Noncompliance Not Yet Verified as Corrected as of FFY 2017 A7 - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone7 - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repordhood TransitionInstructions and MeasurementMonitoring Priority: Effective General SupervisioIndicator 8C: Do not include in the calculation, but provide a separate number for those toddlers for whom the parent FFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data56.69%79.37%82.14%93.44%94.96%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include only those toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C with timely transNumber of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and servicesNumber of toddlers with disabilitThe data reflect all children, potentially eligible for Part B and exiting between April 1, 2019 through June 30, 20198530FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8A - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8A - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data69.57%86.31%83.47%72.41%81.65%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData include notification to both the SEA and LEAYESNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where notification to the SEA and LEA occurred at least 90 days prYESWhat is the source of the data provided for this indicator? State databaseProvide the time period in which the data10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaBased on findings of noncompliance, EIPs were placed on a corrective action plan. EIP leaders were required to work ac8B - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8B - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to report on this indicator. The StatDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target. Describe the method used to collect thFFY20132014201520162017Target 100%100%100%100%100%Data70.34%80.85%77.52%88.81%90.24%TargetsFFY20182019Target100%100%FFY 2018 SPP/APR DataData reflect only those toddlers for whom the Lead Agency has conducted the transitNumber of toddlers with disabilities exiting Part C where the transition conference occurred at least 90 days, and at Provide the time period in which the data were collected (e.g., September through December, fourth quarter, selection 10730FFY 2017 Findings of Noncompliance Verified as CorrectedDescribe how the State verified that the source of noncompliaDescribe how the State verified that each individual case of noncompliance was correctedEIPs were required to submit d8C - Prior FFY Required ActionsNone8C - OSEP ResponseThe State reported that it used data from a State database to repNot ApplicableSelect yes if this indicator is not applicable. YESProvide an explanation of why it is not applicable beDescribe the results of the calculations and compare the results to the target.States are not required to establish baSY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1 Mediations held0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Survey; Section B: Mediation Requests11/11/20192.1.a.i Mediations agreements related to due process complaints0SY 2018-19 EMAPS IDEA Part C Dispute Resolution Surve11/11/20192.1.b.i Mediations agreements not related to due process complaints0Targets: Description of Stakeholder Input Historical DataBaseline 2005FFY20132014201520162017Target>=DataTargetsFFY20182019Target>=FFY 2018 SPP/APR Data2.1.a.i Mediation agreements related to due process complaints2.1.b.i Mediation agreements not related to due process complaints2.1 Number of mediations heldFFY 2017 DataFFY 2018 T10 - Required ActionsIndicator 11: State Systemic Improvement Plan EMBED AcroExch.Document.DC Overall State APR Title: Part C CoordinatorEmail: jsisnroy@azdes.govPhone: 602-532-9960Submitted on: 04/28/20 11:50:09 PMED AttachmentsPreloaded historical dataPrepopulated data from other sourcesCalculatedExplanatory textOctober 2018 PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 1Instructions PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 5Part C

(Grant Year 2018–2019 — Issued June 23, 2020)
How the department made determinations

Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Last modified on September 15, 2020

2020 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART C — Arizona

About IDEA

Subscribe for Updates

About IDEA

Subscribe for Updates

Connect with Us