2018 SPP/APR and State Determination Letters PART B – Michigan
OSEP Response to SPP/APRPDF
OSEP Response to SPP/APR
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON DC 20202 -2600 www.ed.gov The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES June 28 , 2018 Honorable Sheila A. Alles Interim State Superintendent Michigan Department of Education 608 W. Allegan Street P.O. Box 30008 Lansing, M ichigan 48909 Dear Interim Superintendent Alles : I am writing to advise you of the U. S. Department of Education ’s (Department) 201 8 determination under section 616 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA ). The Department has determined that Michigan needs intervention in implementing the requirements of Part B of the IDEA . This determination is based on the totality of the State’s data and information, including th e Federal fiscal year (FFY) 201 6 State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR), other State -reported data, and other publicly available information. Your State’s 201 8 determination is based on the dat a reflected in the State’s “201 8 Part B Results -Driven Accountability Matrix” (RDA Matrix). The RDA Matrix is individualized for each State and consi sts of: (1) a Compliance Matrix that includes scoring on Compliance Indicators and other comp liance factors; (2) a Results Matrix that includes scoring on Results Elements ; (3) a Compliance Score and a Results Score ; (4) an RDA Percentage based on both the Compliance Sc ore and the Results Score ; and (5) the State’s Determination. The RDA Matrix is further explained in a document, entitled “How the Department Made Determinations under Section 616(d) of the Individuals with Di sabilities Education Act in 201 8: Part B ” (HTDMD). The Office of Special Education Programs ( OSEP ) is continuing to use both results data and compliance data in making determinations in 201 8, as it did for Part B determinations in 201 4, 201 5, 2016, and 201 7. (The specifics of the determination procedures and criteria are set forth in the HTDMD and reflected in the RDA Matrix for your State.) In maki ng Part B determinations in 201 8, OSEP continued to use results data related to: (1) the participation of children with disabilities (CWD) on regular Statewide ass essments; Page 2— Chief State School Officer (2) the participation and performance of CWD on the most recently administered (school year 201 6-201 7) National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP); (3) the percentage of CWD who graduated with a regular high school diploma; and (4) the percentage of CWD who drop ped out. You may access the results of OSEP’s review of your State’s SPP/APR and other relevant data by accessing the SPP/APR module using your State -specific log -on information at osep.grads360.org. When you access your State’s SPP/APR on the site, you will find , in Indicators 1 through 16, the OSEP Response to the indicator and any actions that the State is required to take. The actions that the State is required to take are in two places: (1) actions related to the correction of findings of noncompliance are in the “OSEP Response” section of the indicator; and (2) any other actions that the State is required to take are in the “Required Actions” section of the indicator. It is important for you t o review the Introduction to the SPP/APR, which may also include language in the “OSEP Response ” and/or “Required Actions ” sections . You will also find all of the following important documents saved as attachments to the Progress Page: (1) the State’s RDA Ma trix; (2) the HTDMD document; (3) a spreadsheet entitled “201 8 Data Rubric Part B,” which shows how OSEP calculated the State’s “Timely and Accurate State -Reported Data” score in the Compliance Matrix; and (4) a document e ntitled “Dispute Resolution 201 6-17,” which includes the IDEA section 618 data that OSEP used to calculate the State’s “Timely State Complaint Decisions” and “Timely Due Process Hearing Decisions” scores in the Compliance Matrix . As noted above, the Department has determined that Michigan needs intervention in implementing the requirements of Part B of IDEA. The Department identifies a State as needing intervention under IDEA Part B if its RDA Percentage is less than 60%. Michigan’s RDA Percentage is 59.17%. Pursuant to section 616(d)(2)(B) of th e IDEA and 34 CFR §300.603(b)(2), a State that is determined to be “need intervention” or “need substantial intervention” and does not agree with this determination, may request an opportunity to meet with the Assistant Secretary to demonstrate why the Dep artment should change the State’s determination. To request a hearing, submit a letter to Johnny W. Collett, Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20 202 within 15 days of the date of this letter. The letter must include the basis for your request for a change in your State’s determination. States were required to submit Phase II I Year Two of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP ) by April 2, 2018 . OSEP appreciates the State’s ongoing work on its SSIP and its efforts to improve results for students with disabilities. We have carefully reviewed your submission and Page 3— Chief State School Officer will provide feedback in the upcoming weeks. Additionally, OSEP will continue to work wi th your State as it implements the third year of Phase III of the SSIP, which is due on April 1, 2019 . As a reminder, your State must report annually to the public, by posting on the State educational agency’s (SEA’s) website , the performance of each loca l educational agency (LEA) located in the State on the targets in the SPP/APR as soon as practicable, but no later than 120 days after the State’s submission of its FFY 201 6 SPP/APR. In addition, your State must: (1) review LEA performance against targets in the State’s SPP/APR; (2) determine if each LEA “meets the requirements” of Part B, or “needs assistance,” “needs intervention,” or “needs substantial intervention” in implementing Part B of the IDEA ; (3) take appropriate enforcement action; and (4) inform each LEA of its determination. Further, your State must make its SPP/APR available to the public by posting it on the SEA’s web site. Within the next several days, OSEP will be finalizing a State Profile that: (1) will be accessible to the public; (2) includes the State’s determination letter and SPP/APR, and all related State and OSEP attachments; and (3) can be accessed via a URL unique to your State , which you can use to make your SPP/APR available to the public . We will provide you with the unique URL when it i s live. OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to improve results for children and youth with disabilities and looks forward to working with your State over the next year as we continue our important work of improving the lives of children with disabilities and their families. Please contact your OSEP State Lead i f you have any questions, would like to discuss this further, or want to request technical assistance. Sincerely, Ruth E. Ryder Acting Director Office of Special Education Programs cc: State Director of Special Education
(Grant Year 2016-2017—Issued June 28, 2018)
Some historical APRs can be found on the GRADS360 website Public Domain Clearinghouse for APRs. To find available APRs, filter by the state you want to find and then filter by the year. If you cannot find the APR you are looking for, contact the Partner Support Center at EDEN-Submission-System@ed.gov.
idea_file-template-default single single-idea_file postid-64310 wp-custom-logo wp-embed-responsive with-font-selector no-anchor-scroll footer-on-bottom animate-body-popup social-brand-colors hide-focus-outline link-style-standard has-sidebar content-title-style-normal content-width-normal content-style-boxed content-vertical-padding-show non-transparent-header mobile-non-transparent-header kadence-elementor-colors elementor-default elementor-kit-82278
Last modified on July 17, 2018